bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mallet, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Mallet, F..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

RNA-seq transcriptome analysis reveals LTR-retrotransposons modulation in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) after in vivo Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) injection

Human Endogenous Retroviruses (HERVs) and Mammalian apparent LTR-retrotransposons (MaLRs) are retroviral sequences that integrated into the germline cells millions year ago. Transcripts of these LTR-retrotransposons are present in several tissues, and their expression is modulated in pathological conditions, although their function remains often far from being understood. In this work, we focused on the HERVs/MaLRs expression and modulation in a scenario of immune system activation. We used a public dataset of Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) RNA-seq from 15 healthy participants to a clinical trial before and after the exposure to Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), for which we established an RNA-seq workflow for the identification of expressed and modulated cellular genes and LTR-retrotransposon elements. ImportanceWe described the HERV and MaLR transcriptome in PBMCs, finding that about 8.4 % of the LTR-retrotransposons loci were expressed, and identifying the betaretrovirus-like HERVs as those with the highest percentage of expressed loci. We found 4,607 HERVs and MaLRs loci that were modulated as a result of in vivo stimulation with LPS. The HERV-H group showed the highest number of differentially expressed most intact proviruses. We characterized the HERV and MaLR loci differentially expressed checking their genomic context of insertion and, interestingly, we found a general co-localization with genes that are involved and modulated in the immune response, as consequence of LPS stimulation. The analyses of HERVs and MaLRs expression and modulation show that this LTR-retrotransposons are expressed in PBMCs and regulated in inflammatory settings. The similar regulation of HERVs/MaLRs and genes after LPS stimulation suggests possible interactions of LTR-retrotransposons and the immune host response.

microbiology↗

Towards standardization of immune functional assays

Recent advances in the immunotherapy field require evaluation of the immune function to adapt therapeutic decisions. Immune functional assays (IFA) are able to reveal the immune status and would be useful to further adapt/improve patients care. However, standardized methods are needed to implement IFA in clinical settings. We carried out an independent validation of a published method used to characterize the underlying host response to infectious conditions using an IFA. We evaluate the reproducibility and robustness of this IFA and associated readout using an independent healthy volunteers (HV) cohort. Expression of a 44 genes-signatures and IFN{gamma} protein secretion and gene-expression was assessed after stimulation. We observed a strong host-response correlation between the two cohorts. We also highlight that standardized methods for immune function evaluation exist and could be implemented in larger-scale studies. This IFA could be a relevant tool to reveal innate/adaptive immune dysfunction in immune-related disorders patients.

immunology↗

Immune Profiling Panel: a proof of concept study of a new multiplex molecular tool to assess the immune status of critically-ill patients

BackgroundCritical illness such as sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome defined as a dysregulated host response to infection and is characterized by patients exhibiting various impaired immune profiles. In the field of diagnosis, a gap still remains in identifying the immune profile of critically-ill patients in the ICU. The availability of an immune profiling tool holds a great potential in providing patients at high risk with more accurate and precise management. In this study, a multiplex immune profiling panel prototype was assessed for its ability to semi-quantify immune markers directly from blood, using the FilmArray(R) System.\n\nResultsThe Immune Profiling Panel (IPP) prototype consists of 16 biomarkers that target both the innate and adaptive immune responses, pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators as well as genes involved in diverse regulatory pathways. The analytical studies carried out on healthy volunteers showed minimal inter- and intra-variability in testing the samples across the tested lots. The majority of the assays were linear with an R2 higher than 0.8. Results from the IPP pouch were comparable to qPCR and were within the limits of agreement. Finally, quantification cycle values of the target genes were normalized against reference genes to account for the different composition of cells among specimens. The use of the selected panel of markers in IPP demonstrated various gene modulations that could distinctly differentiate three profiles: healthy, borderline mHLA-DR septic shock patients and low mHLA-DR septic shock patients.\n\nConclusionThe Immune Profiling Panel allowed host transcriptomic analysis of immune response biomarkers directly from whole blood in less than an hour. The use of IPP showed great potential for the development of a fully automated, rapid and easy-to-use immune profiling tool, enabling the stratification of critically-ill patients at high risk in the ICU.

immunology↗

Endogenous retroviruses transcriptional modulation after severe infection, trauma and burn.

Although human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) expression is a growing subject of interest, no study focused before on specific endogenous retroviruses loci activation in severely injured patients. Yet, HERV reactivation is observed in immunity compromised settings like some cancers and auto-immune diseases. Our objective was to assess the transcriptional modulation of HERVs in burn, trauma and septic shock patients. We analyzed HERV transcriptome with microarray data from whole blood samples of a burn cohort (n=30), a trauma cohort (n=105) and 2 septic shock cohorts (n=28, n=51), and healthy volunteers (HV, n=60). We described expression of the 337 probesets targeting HERV from U133 plus 2.0 microarray in each dataset and then we compared HERVs transcriptional modulation of patients compared to healthy volunteers. Although all 4 cohorts contained very severe patients, the majority of the 337 HERVs was not expressed (around 74% in mean). Each cohort had differentially expressed probesets in patients compared to HV (from 19 to 46). Strikingly, 5 HERVs were in common in all types of severely injured patients, with 4 being up-modulated in patients. We highlighted co-expressed profiles between HERV and nearby gene as well as autonomous HERV expression. We suggest an inflammatory-specific HERV transcriptional response, and importantly, we introduce that the HERVs close to immunity-related genes might have a role on its expression.

immunology↗