bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Majila, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Majila, K..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation of methods for AlphaFold-based integrative modeling

Motivation Recent methods enable incorporation of experimental data into AlphaFold for predicting structures consistent with the data. However, the applicability of these methods for integrative modeling remains to be determined. It is unclear how these methods balance the input experimental data with the learned structural priors. Results We assess the performance of state-of-the-art AlphaFold-based integrative modeling methods, including AlphaLink2, Boltz2, and GRASP, on a dataset of 37 complexes based on crosslinking data. We evaluate these methods based on their ability to predict structures that satisfy the input crosslinks. We further assess the robustness of these methods to noise in the crosslinking data. Finally, we probe their ability to predict distinct states using crosslinks from multiple states. Overall, our study highlights the limitations of the AF-based IM methods and points to directions for future improvements. Availability and implementation All scripts used to obtain the predictions and perform the analysis in this study are available at https://github.com/isblab/af_im.

bioinformatics↗

GATA3-extension mutants rewire lineage identity in luminal breast cancer

GATA3, one of the most frequently mutated transcription factors in breast cancers, is a master regulator of luminal epithelial identity. Unlike many truncating and splice-site GATA3 mutations that disrupt one of the two zinc finger DNA-binding domains, C-terminal extension mutations (eGATA3) retain both of them. This raises the question of whether the eGATA3 mutants can alter transcriptional regulation and thereby exert distinct functional effects. Here, we integrate patient tumor-derived transcription and chromatin accessibility profiling with cell line derived genome-wide mapping of GATA3 occupancy and single-cell multiomics to define the regulatory consequences of eGATA3. We show that eGATA3 is associated with poor clinical outcome and remodels the luminal transcriptional program, leading to attenuation of estrogen-responsive transcription and progressive loss of luminal differentiation. Mechanistically, eGATA3 maintains widespread chromatin occupancy but redistributes GATA3 binding across different classes of regulatory elements, with preferential loss at AP-1 motif-enriched sites and gain at FOX-associated enhancers, along with coordinated remodeling of chromatin accessibility. These changes rewire the luminal regulatory landscape, destabilizing lineage identity without inducing complete lineage conversion. Together, our findings identify eGATA3 as a mechanistically distinct class of GATA3 mutation that promotes lineage plasticity through redistribution of genomic occupancy rather than loss of DNA-binding function alone.

cancer biology↗

Integrative structure determination of a human mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system (MICOS) sub-assembly

The Mitochondrial contact site and Cristae Organizing System (MICOS) complex is an inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) assembly present at the cristae junction. It is responsible for regulating cristae formation and remodeling. However, its structure is not known. We applied Bayesian integrative structure determination to characterize the structure of the Mic60, Mic19, Mic10, and Mic13-containing MICOS complex combining AlphaFold predictions with data from crosslinking mass spectrometry, biochemical assays, electron tomography, homology modeling, and sequence alignments. The integrative structure revealed novel mutual interfaces among Mic10N,C, Mic60LBS1,LBS2,mitofilin, and Mic13central,C, which were experimentally validated. Several likely-pathogenic missense mutations also localize to these novel interfaces, highlighting their importance. Our results indicate that Mic13 likely facilitates MICOS assembly by binding Mic10 in the IMM-proximal region and Mic60 in the intermembrane space. Taken together, our integrative approach sheds light on the structure and assembly of the MICOS complex.

bioinformatics↗

Multicomplex Integrative Structural Modeling of a Human Histone Deacetylase Interactome

Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) 1 and 2 are key enzymatic components in multiple large chromatin remodeling complexes including NuRD, SIN3, and CoREST. In addition, both HDAC 1 and 2 contain a large intrinsically disordered region (IDR) within their C-terminal domain (CTD). How HDAC1/2 assemble into these complexes and the structure of the CTD IDR remains poorly understood. Here, we used HDAC1/2 to isolate their protein interaction networks from cells and used crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) coupled with the Integrative Modeling Platform to build structural models of the NuRD, SIN3A, and CoREST complexes. Next, we implemented an AlphaFold-enabled XL-MS constrained modeling approach to investigate how HDAC1 could assemble into these complexes. We show that the CTD IDR of HDAC1 folds into alpha helices in these complexes. Finally, we built a complete integrative structural model of a NuRD subcomplex including the abundant HDAC1:MBD3:MTA1:GATAD2B:RBBP4 subunits, which included 6 IDRs. The approaches used herein are broadly applicable for the study of protein complexes and protein interaction networks that can provide important insights into IDRs.

systems biology↗

A deep learning method for predicting interactions for intrinsically disordered regions of proteins

Intrinsically disordered proteins or regions (IDPs/IDRs) adopt diverse binding modes with different partners, from coupled-folding-and-binding, to fuzzy binding, to fully-disordered binding. Characterizing IDR interfaces is challenging experimentally and computationally. The state-of-the-art AlphaFold-multimer and AlphaFold3 can be used to predict IDR binding sites, although they are less accurate at their benchmarked confidence cutoffs. Here, we developed Disobind, a deep-learning method that predicts inter-protein contact maps and interface residues for an IDR and its partner, given their sequences. It uses sequence embeddings from the ProtT5 protein language model. Disobind outperforms state-of-the-art interface predictors for IDRs. It also outperforms AlphaFold-multimer and AlphaFold3 at multiple confidence cutoffs. Combining Disobind and AlphaFold-multimer predictions further improves the performance. In contrast to current methods, Disobind considers the context of the binding partner and does not depend on structures and multiple sequence alignments. Its predictions can be used to localize IDRs in large assemblies and characterize IDR-mediated interactions. A record of this papers transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.

bioinformatics↗

StrIDR: a database of intrinsically disordered regions of proteins with experimentally resolved structures

MotivationIntrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) of proteins exist as an ensemble of conformations, and not as a single structure. Existing databases contain extensive, experimentally derived annotations of intrinsic disorder for millions of proteins at the sequence level. However, only a tiny fraction of these IDRs are associated with an experimentally determined protein structure. Moreover, even if a structure exists, parts of the disordered regions may still be unresolved. ResultsHere we organize Structures of Intrinsically Disordered Regions (StrIDR), a database of IDRs confirmed via experimental or homology-based evidence, resolved in experimentally determined structures. The database can provide useful insights into the dynamics, folding, and interactions of IDRs. It can also facilitate computational studies on IDRs, such as those using molecular dynamics simulations and/or machine learning. AvailabilityStrIDR is available at https://isblab.ncbs.res.in/stridr. The web UI allows for downloading PDB structures and SIFTS mappings of individual entries. Additionally, the entire database can be downloaded in a JSON format. The source code for creating and updating the database is available at https://github.com/isblab/stridr.

bioinformatics↗

Optimizing representations for integrative structural modeling using Bayesian model selection

MotivationIntegrative structural modeling combines data from experiments, physical principles, statistics of previous structures, and prior models to obtain structures of macromolecular assemblies that are challenging to characterize experimentally. The choice of model representation is a key decision in integrative modeling, as it dictates the accuracy of scoring, efficiency of sampling, and resolution of analysis. But currently, the choice is usually made ad hoc, manually. ResultsHere, we report NestOR (Nested Sampling for Optimizing Representation), a fully automated, statistically rigorous method based on Bayesian model selection to identify the optimal coarse-grained representation for a given integrative modeling setup. Given an integrative modeling setup, it determines the optimal representations from given candidate representations based on their model evidence and sampling efficiency. The performance of NestOR was evaluated on a benchmark of four macromolecular assemblies. AvailabilityNestOR is implemented in the Integrative Modeling Platform (https://integrativemodeling.org) and is available at https://github.com/isblab/nestor. Data for the benchmark is at https://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10360718. Supplementary Information is available online.

bioinformatics↗