bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mahita, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Mahita, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Characterizing antibodies binding to the same epitope reveals limited contribution by heavy chain CDR3 sequences relative to other CDRs

The antigen specificity of antibodies is defined mainly by their highly-variable complementarity-determining regions (CDRs), of which the CDR3 is considered to be the most important. Similar antibodies are expected to bind the same epitope on an antigen, but how this similarity should be quantified is unclear. Here, we utilized a large body of publicly available data to identify features that are most informative in predicting if two antibodies are likely to bind to the same epitope. We examined features such as pairwise sequence identities, CDR structural similarity, and geometrical similarity of antibody paratopes. We found that, for antibodies with high overall sequence similarity, the CDR sequence identity alone is sufficient to predict if a pair of antibodies binds to the same epitope. Strikingly, the sequence identity of CDR1 and CDR2 had as much or more predictive power than CDR3, which is commonly thought of as the main determinant of antibody specificity. In addition, for antibody pairs with lower overall sequence identity, including structural information led to significant improvements in predictive performance. Guided by these results, we developed BCRMatch (https://github.com/IEDB/BCRMatch) which uses an ensemble machine-learning approach to predict if pairs of antibodies target the same epitope based on antibody sequence alone. This can be applied to identify potential targets of an antibody of interest by comparing it to antibodies with known specificities.

bioinformatics↗

Putting computational models of immunity to the test - an invited challenge to predict B. pertussis vaccination outcomes

Systems vaccinology studies have been used to build computational models that predict individual vaccine responses and identify the factors contributing to differences in outcome. Comparing such models is challenging due to variability in study designs. To address this, we established a community resource to compare models predicting B. pertussis booster responses and generate experimental data for the explicit purpose of model evaluation. We here describe our second computational prediction challenge using this resource, where we benchmarked 49 algorithms from 53 scientists. We found that the most successful models stood out in their handling of nonlinearities, reducing large feature sets to representative subsets, and advanced data preprocessing. In contrast, we found that models adopted from literature that were developed to predict vaccine antibody responses in other settings performed poorly, reinforcing the need for purpose-built models. Overall, this demonstrates the value of purpose-generated datasets for rigorous and open model evaluations to identify features that improve the reliability and applicability of computational models in vaccine response prediction.

immunology↗