bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mahe, M. I.

Publications and source records attributed to Mahe, M. I..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Chemostat-Based Model for Growing Bacterial Biofilms

Biofilms are groups of microbes that live together in dense communities, often attached to a surface. They play an outsized role in all aspects of microbial life, from chronic infections to biofouling to dental decay. In recent decades, appreciation for the diversity of roles that biofilms play in the environment has grown. Yet, most bacterial studies still rely upon approaches developed in the 19th century and center on planktonic populations alone. Here we present a chemostat-based experimental platform to investigate not only biofilms themselves, but how they interact with their surrounding environments. Our results show that biofilms grow to larger sizes in chemostats as opposed to flasks. In addition, we show that biofilms may be a consistent source of migrants into planktonic populations. We also show that secondary biofilms rapidly develop, although these may be more susceptible to environmental conditions. Taken together, our data suggest that chemostats may be a flexible and insightful platform for the study of biofilms in vitro. IMPORTANCEBiofilms are the predominant way that bacteria live in natural environments and are characterized by three emergent properties: ubiquity, resilience, and impact. They can be found across all environments, both natural and human-made, and across all of recorded time, dating back at least 3.5 billion years. Biofilms also represent a major economic impact of over $5 trillion annually. Yet, most of what is known about bacteria is the result of studies using planktonically growing liquid cultures under laboratory conditions. Here, we propose a comprehensive experimental platform that allows for study of biofilms on the molecular, organismal, and community levels using chemostats.

microbiology↗

Risk of Infection Due to Airborne Virus in Classroom Environments Lacking Mechanical Ventilation

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the role of indoor environments on disease transmission. Enclosed spaces where pathogen-laden aerosols accumulate was strongly linked to increased transmission events. Here we employ a surrogate non-pathogenic virus, the bacteriophage phi6, to interrogate aerosol transmission in classroom environments that do not have any natural or mechanical ventilation in order to determine how effectively aerosols facilitate new infections. We find that virus-laden aerosols establish new infections over all distances tested within minutes and that the time of exposure did not change transmission rate. We further find that humidity, but not temperature nor a UV-based disinfection device, significantly impacted transmission rates. Our data suggest that, even without mechanical ventilation, relative humidity remains a highly effective mitigation strategy while UV air treatment did not. Practical ImplicationsTransmission of pathogens through airborne particles is a major source of disease transmission. People now spend much of their time indoors, thus understanding indoor airborne transmission is vital to managing outbreaks. Most classrooms in the U.S. do not have any mechanical ventilation systems and so here, we test airborne transmission of a virus in such classrooms. Infection transmission rates are not greatly impacted by distance, time or even some UV treatment, but are curbed by the amount of moisture in the air.

microbiology↗