bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Maeder, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Maeder, P..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Data Fusion for Integrative Species Identification Using Deep Learning

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWDNA analyses have revolutionized species identification and taxonomic work. Yet, persistent challenges arise from little differentiation among species and considerable variation within species, particularly among closely related groups. While images are commonly used as an alternative modality for automated identification tasks, their usability is limited by the same concerns. An integrative strategy, fusing molecular and image data through machine learning, holds significant promise for fine-grained species identification. However, a systematic overview and rigorous statistical testing concerning molecular and image preprocessing and fusion techniques, including practical advice for biologists, are missing so far. We introduce a machine learning scheme that integrates both molecular and image data for species identification. Initially, we systematically assess and compare three different DNA arrangements (aligned, unaligned, SNP-reduced) and two encoding methods (fractional, ordinal). Later, artificial neural networks are used to extract visual and molecular features, and we propose strategies for fusing this information. Specifically, we investigate three strategies: I) fusing directly after feature extraction, II) fusing features that passed through a fully connected layer after feature extraction, and III) fusing the output scores of both unimodal models. We systematically and statistically evaluate these strategies for four eukaryotic datasets, including two plant (Asteraceae, Poaceae) and two animal families (Lycaenidae, Coccinellidae) using Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV). In addition, we developed an approach to understand molecular-and image-specific identification failure. Aligned sequences with nucleotides encoded as decimal number vectors achieved the highest identification accuracy among DNA data preprocessing techniques in all four datasets. Fusing molecular and visual features directly after feature extraction yielded the best results for three out of four datasets (52-99%). Overall, combining DNA with image data significantly increased accuracy in three out of four datasets, with plant datasets showing the most substantial improvement (Asteraceae: +19%, Poaceae: +13.6%). Even for Lycaenidae with high identification accuracy based on molecular data (>96%), a statistically significant improvement (+2.1%) was observed. Detailed analysis of confusion rates between and within genera shows that DNA alone tends to identify the genus correctly, but often fails to recognize the species. The failure to resolve species is alleviated by including image data in the training. This increase in resolution hints at. a hierarchical role of modalities in which molecular data coarsely groups the specimens to then be guided towards a more fine-grained identification by the connected image. We systematically showed and explained, for the first time, that optimizing the preprocessing and integration of molecular and image data otters significant benefits, particularly for genetically similar and morphologically indistinguishable species, enhancing species identification by reducing modality-specific failure rates and information gaps. Our results can inform integration efforts for various organism groups, improving automated identification across a wide range of eukaryotic species.

bioinformatics↗

Microbial resistance and resilience to drought under organic and conventional farming

The impacts of climate change, such as drought, can affect soil microbial communities. These communities are crucial for soil functioning and crop production. Organic and conventional cropping systems promote distinct soil microbiomes and soil organic carbon contents, which might maintain different capacities to mitigate drought effects on cropping systems. A field-scale drought simulation was performed in long-term organically and conventionally managed cropping systems differing in fertilization and pesticide application. The soil microbiome was assessed during and after drought in bulk soil, rhizosphere, and roots of wheat. We found that drought shifted microbial community structures, affecting fungi more strongly than prokaryotes. Microbial communities associated with crops (i.e. rhizosphere and root) were more strongly influenced by drought compared to bulk soil communities. A drought legacy effect was observed in the bulk soil after harvesting and rewetting. The resistance and resilience of the soil microbiome to severe drought did not significantly differ across the organic and conventional cropping systems, although few individual genera (e.g. Streptomyces, Rhizophagus, Actinomadura, and Aneurinibacillus) showed system-specific drought responses. All cropping systems showed relative increases in potential plant growth-promoting genera under drought. This agricultural field study indicated that fungal communities might be less resistant to drought than prokaryotic communities in cropping systems and these effects get more pronounced in closer association with plants. Organic fertilization or the reduction in pesticide application might not have the ability to buffer severe drought stress and additional farming practices might have to be incorporated to improve drought tolerance in cropping systems.

microbiology↗

Influence of spatial arrangement, biofertilizers and bioirrigation on the performance of legume-millet intercropping system in rainfed areas of southern India

Biofertilization via the inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), combined with rhizobia and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), are beginning to become established as an effective and sustainable measure to improve yields. Biofertilization might have a particular potential to boost the yield of intercropping systems in rainfed areas because AMF can form a common mycorrhizal network (CMN) that can transfer nutrients and water between two plants and balance as such belowground competition. In this study, we tested if biofertilizers can enhance the yield of intercropping systems using a pigeon pea (PP) - finger millet (FM) intercropping system grown for two consecutive growing seasons (2016/17 and 2017/18) at two contrasting sites in Bengaluru and Kolli Hills, India. To validate the process of bioirrigation (transfer of water between rhizosphere of two plants), we tested, for the first time, if the spatial arrangement of intercropped plants using either a row-wise or a mosaic design affected yield and water relations with and without biofertilizers. Our results demonstrate that intercropping can improve the straw and grain yield in PP-FM intercropping compared to the respective monocultures but that intercropping effects vary depending on the site characteristic such as climate and soil type. Spatial arrangement of component plants affected the total, straw and grain biomass in intercropping treatments, but this effect also varied across sites. Most importantly, the results from the 2017-18 growing season clearly demonstrated a positive effect of biofertilizer on biomass yield, and this effect was irrespective of site, spatial arrangement, mixed or monoculture. Despite a yield increase in intercropping, we did not see a positive effect of biofertilization on water relations of FM possibly due to interspecific competition for soil moisture where PP dominated. In summary, our study shows the potential of biofertilizers to increase the yield of intercropping systems in rainfed dryland agriculture.

ecology↗