bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Madsen, k. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Madsen, k. L..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Glutamate receptor-dependent cytosolic acidification in hippocampal neurons involves passive flux of protons from the extracellular space

Glutamate receptor-dependent cytosolic acidification can be induced in hippocampal neurons by pharmacological or seizure-like stimulation. This acidification is thought to arise from Ca2+ and metabolism-related processes, however, the exact underlying mechanism as well as its functional role remains uncertain. To reassess the mechanism of cytosolic acidification in excitatory hippocampal neurons and address the physiological relevance of the phenomenon, we combined pH/Ca2+ biosensors to study activity-induced pH dynamics in hippocampal neurons. First, we addressed cytosolic acidification in relation to LTP at hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses. Using hippocampal slices from adult rats of both sexes, we show that LTP-inducing stimulation at the Schaffer collaterals evokes transient cytosolic acidification in hippocampal CA1 neurons. This highlights neuronal pH shifts as a trait of general hippocampal neurotransmission rather than a marker of excitotoxicity, possibly serving as a secondary messenger. Moreover, using dissociated hippocampal neurons from rat embryos, we show that glutamate receptor agonists typically induce larger cytosolic acid shifts compared to simple depolarization or spontaneous activity, suggesting that glutamate receptor-mediated acidification involves several separate mechanisms; pyruvate-dependent dampening of neuronal acidification may reflect a direct inhibition of NMDA receptors rather than reduced glycolytic activity, questioning the previously reported involvement of metabolism in cytosolic acidification; and whereas acid shifts induced by simple depolarization show exclusive dependence on cytosolic Ca2+, AMPA-induced acidification depends both on cytosolic Ca2+ and on an inward electrochemical driving force for protons. These results suggest that glutamate receptor-induced cytosolic acidification relies both on cytosolic Ca2+ and on a passive proton influx, possibly mediated by the receptor itself. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=166 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/624027v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (48K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1393cfcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d2dc9corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@191b24corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@50b2f3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Significance statementAlthough several studies report that hippocampal pyramidal neurons show significant cytosolic acidification in response to activation by drugs, epilepsy and stroke, the molecular mechanism and functional impact of the phenomenon remains uncertain. Using live imaging of both Ca and H dynamics, we demonstrate that the induction of LTP at hippocampal synapses is associated with cytosolic acidification in the postsynaptic neurons, suggesting that the cytosolic acid shifts may be a general trait of neurotransmission and related plasticity. We further revisit the mechanistic relation between the two ion systems. Our results suggest that glutamate receptor-induced cytosolic acidification involves two distinct mechanisms, one related to cytosolic Ca and another involving a passive H influx, possibly mediated by the receptor itself.

neuroscience↗

Membrane curvature association of amphipathic helix 8 drives constitutive GPCR endocytosis

Cellular signaling relies on the activity of transmembrane receptors and their presentation on the cellular surface. Their continuous insertion in the plasma membrane is balanced by constitutive and activity dependent internalization, which is orchestrated by adaptor proteins recognizing semi-specific motifs within the receptors intracellular regions. Here we describe a complementary and evolutionary conserved and refined trafficking mechanism for G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR). This mechanism relies on the insertion of their amphipathic helix 8 into the inner leaflet of lipid membranes, orthogonal to the transmembrane helices. These amphipathic helices dictate subcellular localization of the receptors and autonomously drive their endocytosis by cooperative assembly and association with areas of high membrane curvature. The strength of helix 8 membrane insertion propensity quantitatively predicts the rate of constitutive internalization of GPCRs. This discovery advances our understanding of membrane protein trafficking and highlights a new principle of receptor-lipid interactions that may have broader implications for cellular signaling and therapeutic targeting. One-Sentence SummaryReceptor proteins navigate cellular membranes by interacting with their curvature using an evolutionary conserved mechanism that relies on amphipathic helices and complements direct coupling to the endocytic protein machinery.

cell biology↗

Coding variants identified in diabetic patients alter PICK1 BAR domain function in insulin granule biogenesis

Bin/amphiphysin/Rvs (BAR) domains are positively charged crescent-shaped modules that shape negatively charged curved lipid membranes during membrane remodeling processes. The BAR domain proteins ICA69, PICK1 and arfaptins have recently been demonstrated to coordinate the budding and formation of immature secretory granules (ISGs) at the trans-Golgi network. Here, we identify four coding variants in the PICK1 gene from a Danish whole-exome screening of diabetic patients, that all involve change of positively charged residues in the PICK1 BAR domain. All four coding variants failed to rescue the insulin content in INS-1E cells upon KD of endogenous PICK1. Moreover, two variants showed dominant negative properties. Interestingly, in vitro assays addressing the BAR domain function suggest that the coding variants compromised membrane binding capacity but increased capacity to cause fission of liposomes. Live confocal microscopy and super-resolution microscopy further revealed that PICK1 resides transiently on ISGs before egress via vesicular budding events. Interestingly, this egress of PICK1 was accelerated in the coding variants. We propose that PICK1 assists or complements the removal of excess membrane and generic membrane trafficking proteins, and possibly also insulin from ISGs during the maturation process and that the coding variants may cause premature budding possibly explaining their dominant negative function.

cell biology↗