bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Maddaloni, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Maddaloni, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Timed STING Inhibition Mitigates Gastrointestinal GvHD While Preserving Graft-versus-Leukemia Activity After Allo-HSCT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is curative for hematological malignancies but limited by graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), in which donor T cells damage host tissues. Current prophylaxis broadly suppresses donor immunity, often compromising the beneficial graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) response, highlighting the need for strategies that uncouple GvHD from GvL. The cGAS-STING pathway can be strongly activated during conditioning-induced tissue damage and represents a potential therapeutic target. However, its context-dependent roles in inflammation and homeostasis have constrained its clinical translation. Here, we show that "timed" administration of the covalent STING inhibitor H151 before conditioning reduced GvHD-associated mortality without impairing GvL in murine allo-BMT models. Donor T cell activation and effector function were preserved, indicating that the protective effect operates at the level of GvHD target tissues rather than through systemic immunosuppression. Timed STING inhibition protected the intestinal epithelium by limiting apoptosis, preserving intestinal stem cell function, and sustaining metabolic fitness during conditioning-induced injury, independently of type I interferon (IFN-I) signaling. In allo-HSCT patients, low intestinal STING expression is associated with reduced transplant-related mortality. Together, these findings identify timed STING inhibition as a tissue-protective prophylactic strategy that could be incorporated into existing conditioning regimens to enhance efficacy while minimizing toxicity.

immunology↗

Optimized Mucosal MVA Prime/ Soluble gp120 Boost Vaccination Regimen Induces Similar Antibody Responses as an Intramuscular Regimen

The benefits of mucosal vaccines over injected vaccines are difficult to ascertain since mucosally administered vaccines often induce serum antibody responses of lower magnitude than those induced by injected vaccines. This study aimed to determine if mucosal vaccination using a modified vaccinia Ankara expressing HIV-1 gp120 (MVA-g120) prime and HIV-1 gp120 protein boost could be optimized to induce serum antibody responses similar to those induced by an intramuscularly (IM) administered MVA prime/gp120 boost to allow comparison of an IM immunization regimen to a mucosal vaccination regimen for their ability to protect against a low dose rectal SHIV challenge while inducing similar serum anti-HIV-1 antibody responses. A 3-fold higher antigen dose was required for intranasal (IN) immunization with gp120 to induce serum anti-gp120 IgG responses not significantly different than those induced by IM immunization. Gp120 fused to the Adenovirus type 2 fiber binding domain (gp120-Ad2F), a mucosal targeting ligand, exhibited enhanced IN immunogenicity when compared to gp120 alone. MVA-gp120 was more immunogenic after IN delivery than gastric or rectal delivery, although serum antibodies induced by IN immunization were lower than those induced by intramuscular immunization. Using these optimized vaccines, an IN MVA-gp120 prime, combined IM (gp120) and IN (gp120-Ad2F) boost regimen (IN/IM+IN) induced serum anti-gp120 antibody titers similar to those induced by the intramuscular prime/boost regimen (IM/IM) in rabbits and non-human primates. Despite the induction of similar systemic anti-HIV-1 antibody responses, neither the IM/IM nor the IN/IM+IN regimen induced elevated anti-HIV-1 mucosal IgA responses nor protected against a repeated low-dose rectal SHIV challenge. These results demonstrate that immunization regimens utilizing the IN route are able to induce serum antigen-specific antibody responses similar to those induced by systemic immunization\n\nIMPORTANCEMucosal vaccination is proposed as a method of immunization able to induce protection against mucosal pathogens that is superior to protection provided by parenteral immunization. However, mucosal vaccination often induces serum antigen-specific immune responses of lower magnitude than those induced by parenteral immunization, making the comparison of mucosal and parenteral immunization difficult. We identified vaccine parameters that allowed an immunization regimen consisting of an IN prime followed with boosters administered by both IN and IM routes to induce serum antibody responses similar to those induced by IM prime/boost vaccination. Additional studies are needed to determine the potential benefit of mucosal immunization for HIV-1 and other mucosally-transmitted pathogens.

immunology↗