Biology subjects

Mada, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Mada, M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

The Taco Setup: A Novel TMS-fMRI Setup for High Resolution Whole Brain Imaging

Simultaneous TMS-fMRI holds significant opportunities for advancing basic and translational neuroscience. However, current configurations face technical limitations, particularly the need to accommodate TMS hardware within the MRI environment. Previous solutions have used low numbers of radio-frequency (RF) channels, limiting fMRI data quality and whole-brain coverage. Here, we introduce a novel 22-channel "Taco" TMS-fMRI configuration that re-purposes flexible RF coils, wrapping them around both the participants head and the TMS coil to preserve whole brain signal reception. Guided by precision fMRI principles, we optimized acquisition protocols to achieve to achieve high temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) across the cortex. Data from three pilot participants demonstrate robust signal quality, including in regions proximal to the TMS coil. This setup offers a relatively simple and cost-effective approach to integrating precision fMRI into TMS-fMRI research.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Comparison of MR coil options for concurrent TMS-fMRI

Concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is increasingly being used to study how TMS affects neural processing in local and remote connected brain regions. However, there are many technical challenges that arise when operating this unique combination of techniques. One such challenge is MR head coil compatibility and the image resolution that can be achieved. Here we compare the temporal-signal-to noise-ratio (tSNR) between 3 different MR head coils that can be used with TMS. We show that the 7-channel TMS-dedicated surface coils result in a very high tSNR directly under the TMS and the supplementary coil in comparison to the TxRx and the Magnetica. However, there is low tSNR elsewhere. This field inhomogeneity may not be suitable for all research questions, for example where the aim is to look at distributed neural responses. In these cases, an MR coil with a more homogeneous tSNR such as the Magnetica, may be more appropriate.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Now you see it, now you don't: optimal parameters for interslice stimulation in concurrent TMS-fMRI

The powerful combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) concurrent with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provides rare insights into the causal relationships between brain activity and behaviour. Despite a recent resurgence in popularity, TMS-fMRI remains technically challenging. Here we examined the feasibility of applying TMS during short gaps between fMRI slices to avoid incurring artefacts in the fMRI data. We quantified signal dropout and changes in temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) for TMS pulses presented at timepoints from 100ms before to 100ms after slice onset. Up to 3 pulses were delivered per volume using MagVentures MR-compatible TMS coil. We used a spherical phantom, two 7-channel TMS-dedicated surface coils, and a multiband (MB) sequence (factor=2) with interslice gaps of 100ms and 40ms, on a Siemens 3T Prisma-fit scanner. For comparison we repeated a subset of parameters with a more standard single-channel TxRx (birdcage) coil, and with a human participant and surface coil set up. We found that, even at 100% stimulator output, pulses applied at least - 40ms/+50ms from the onset of slice readout avoid incurring artifacts. This was the case for all three setups. Thus, an interslice protocol can be achieved with a frequency of up to ~10 Hz, using a standard EPI sequence (slice acquisition time: 62.5ms, interslice gap: 40ms). Faster stimulation frequencies would require shorter slice acquisition times, for example using in-plane acceleration. Interslice TMS-fMRI protocols provide a promising avenue for retaining flexible timing of stimulus delivery without incurring TMS artifacts.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Influence of prior beliefs on perception in early psychosis: effects of illness stage and hierarchical level of belief

Alterations in the balance between prior expectations and sensory evidence may account for faulty perceptions and inferences leading to psychosis. However, uncertainties remain about the nature of altered prior expectations and the degree to which they vary with the emergence of psychosis. We explored how expectations arising at two different levels - cognitive and perceptual - influenced processing of sensory information and whether relative influences of higher and lower level priors differed across people with prodromal symptoms and those with psychotic illness. In two complementary auditory perception experiments, 91 participants (30 with first episode psychosis, 29 at clinical risk for psychosis, and 32 controls) were required to decipher a phoneme within ambiguous auditory input. Expectations were generated in two ways: an accompanying visual input of lip movements observed during auditory presentation, or through written presentation of a phoneme provided prior to auditory presentation. We determined how these different types of information shaped auditory perceptual experience, how this was altered across the prodromal and established phases of psychosis, and how this relates to cingulate glutamate levels assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The psychosis group relied more on high level cognitive priors compared to both healthy controls and those at clinical risk for psychosis, and more on low level perceptual priors than the clinical risk group. The risk group were marginally less reliant on low level perceptual priors than controls. The results are consistent with previous theory that influences of prior expectations in psychosis in perception differ according to level of prior and illness phase.\n\nGeneral scientific summaryWhat we perceive and believe on any given moment will allow us to form expectations about what we will experience in the next. In psychosis, it is believed that the influence of these so-called perceptual and cognitive prior expectations on perception is altered, thereby giving rise to the symptoms seen in psychosis. However, research thus far has found mixed evidence, some suggesting an increase in the influence of priors and some finding a decrease. Here we test the hypothesis that perceptual and cognitive priors are differentially affected in individuals at-risk for psychosis and individuals with a first episode of psychosis, thereby partially explaining the mixed findings in the literature. We indeed found evidence in favour of this hypothesis, finding weaker perceptual priors in individuals at-risk, but stronger cognitive priors in individuals with first episode psychosis.

neuroscience↗