bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Macgregor, C. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Macgregor, C. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Construction, validation and application of nocturnal pollen transport networks in an agro-ecosystem: a comparison using microscopy and DNA metabarcoding

O_LIMoths are globally relevant as pollinators but nocturnal pollination remains poorly understood. Plant-pollinator interaction networks are traditionally constructed using either flower-visitor observations or pollen-transport detection using microscopy. Recent studies have shown the potential of DNA metabarcoding for detecting and identifying pollen-transport interactions. However, no study has directly compared the realised observations of pollen-transport networks between DNA metabarcoding and conventional light microscopy.\nC_LIO_LIUsing matched samples of nocturnal moths, we construct pollen-transport networks using two methods: light microscopy and DNA metabarcoding. Focussing on the feeding mouthparts of moths, we develop and provide reproducible methods for merging DNA metabarcoding and ecological network analysis to better understand species-interactions.\nC_LIO_LIDNA metabarcoding detected pollen on more individual moths, and detected multiple pollen types on more individuals than microscopy, but the average number of pollen types per individual was unchanged. However, after aggregating individuals of each species, metabarcoding detected more interactions per moth species. Pollen-transport network metrics differed between methods, because of variation in the ability of each to detect multiple pollen types per moth and to separate morphologically-similar or related pollen. We detected unexpected but plausible moth-plant interactions with metabarcoding, revealing new detail about nocturnal pollination systems.\nC_LIO_LIThe nocturnal pollination networks observed using metabarcoding and microscopy were similar, yet distinct, with implications for network ecologists. Comparisons between networks constructed using metabarcoding and traditional methods should therefore be treated with caution. Nevertheless, the potential applications of metabarcoding for studying plant-pollinator interaction networks are encouraging, especially when investigating understudied pollinators such as moths.\nC_LI

ecology

Estimating sampling completeness of interactions in quantitative bipartite ecological networks: incorporating variation in species specialisation

BackgroundThe analysis of ecological networks can be affected by sampling effort, potentially leading to bias. Ecological network structure is often summarised by descriptive metrics but these metrics can vary according to the proportion of the total interactions that have been observed. Therefore, to know the likely degree of bias, it is valuable to estimate the total number of interactions in a network, and so calculate the proportion of interactions that have been observed (sampling completeness of interactions). Existing approaches to estimate sampling completeness of interactions use the Chao family of asymptotic species richness estimators to predict the total number of interactions, but do not fully utilise information about the relative specialisation of species within the network.\n\nResultsHere, we propose a modification of previously-used methods, that places equal weight on each interaction (whether or not it has been observed), rather than on each species. Our approach is therefore equivalent to weighting the interaction sampling completeness of each species in the network according to its relative specialisation. We demonstrate that, for the subset of species that are observed and when assuming that species richness estimators accurately project the number of unobserved interactions per observed species, our approach is mathematically more accurate. Our approach can be universally applied to any quantitative, bipartite network.\n\nWe propose two methods to estimation using our approach, using abundance-based and incidence-based species richness estimators respectively, and give recommendations when each should be applied. We discuss the effect of unobserved species and the potential use of a threshold of minimum abundance for species inclusion. Finally, we consider these advances in the context of some of the main issues surrounding estimation of interaction sampling completeness in network ecology.\n\nConclusionsWe recommend that future studies of bipartite networks utilise our approach and methods to estimate the sampling completeness of interactions, to assist with the quantitative and comparative analysis and interpretation of network properties.

ecology