bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Maccari, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Maccari, G..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Anti-capsule human monoclonal antibodies protect against hypervirulent and pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

The silent pandemic caused by antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires innovative therapeutic approaches. Human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which are among the most transformative, safe and effective drugs in oncology and autoimmunity, are rarely used for infectious diseases and not yet used for AMR. Here we applied an antigen-agnostic strategy to isolate extremely potent human mAbs against Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) sequence type 147 (ST147), a hypervirulent and pandrug-resistant clonotype which is spreading globally. Isolated mAbs target the bacterial capsule and the O-antigen. Surprisingly, although both capsule- and O-antigen-specific mAbs displayed bactericidal activity in the picomolar range in vitro, only the capsule-specific mAbs were protective against fulminant ST147 bloodstream infection. Protection correlated with in vitro bacterial uptake by macrophages and enchained bacterial growth. Our study describes the only drug able to protect against pandrug-resistant Kp and provides a strategy to isolate mAbs and identify correlates of protection against AMR bacteria.

microbiology↗

High-resolution map of the Fc-functions mediated by COVID-19 neutralizing antibodies

A growing body of evidence shows that Fc-dependent antibody effector functions play an important role in protection from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. To unravel the mechanisms that drive these responses, we analyzed the phagocytosis and complement deposition mediated by a panel of 482 human monoclonal antibodies (nAbs) neutralizing the original Wuhan virus, expressed as recombinant IgG1. Our study confirmed that nAbs no longer neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants can retain their Fc-functions. Surprisingly, we found that nAbs with the most potent Fc-function recognize the N- terminal domain, followed by those targeting Class 3 epitopes in the receptor binding domain. Interestingly, nAbs direct against the Class 1/2 epitopes in the receptor binding motif, which are the most potent in neutralizing the virus, were the weakest in Fc-functions. The divergent properties of the neutralizing and Fc- function mediating antibodies were confirmed by the use of different B cell germlines and by the observation that Fc-functions of polyclonal sera differ from the profile observed with nAbs, suggesting that not-neutralizing antibodies also contribute to Fc-functions. These data provide a high-resolution picture of the Fc-antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 and suggest that the Fc contribution should be considered for the design of improved vaccines, the selection of therapeutic antibodies and the evaluation of correlates of protection.

immunology↗

mRNA vaccines and hybrid immunity use different B cell germlines to neutralize Omicron BA.4 and BA.5

SARS-CoV-2 omicron BA.4 and BA.5, characterized by high transmissibility and ability to escape natural and vaccine induced immunity, are rampaging worldwide. To understand the escape mechanisms, we tested the neutralizing activity against omicron BA.4 and BA.5 of a panel of 482 human monoclonal antibodies that had been isolated from people who received two or three mRNA vaccine doses or from people that had been vaccinated after infection. None of the antibodies isolated after two vaccine doses neutralized omicron BA.4 and BA.5, while these variants were neutralized by approximately 15% of antibodies obtained from people that received three doses or had been vaccinated after infection. Remarkably, the antibodies isolated after three vaccine doses targeted mainly the receptor binding domain (RBD) Class 1/2 epitope region and were encoded by the IGHV1-69 and IGHV3-66 B cell germlines, while the antibodies isolated after infection recognized mostly the RBD Class 3 epitope region and the NTD, and were encoded by the IGHV2-5;IGHJ4-1 and IGHV1-24;IGHJ4-1 germlines. The observation that mRNA vaccination and hybrid immunity elicit a different immunity against the same antigen is intriguing and its understanding may help to design the next generation of therapeutics and vaccines against COVID-19.

immunology↗

COVID-19 mRNA third dose induces a unique hybrid immunity-like antibody response

The continuous evolution of SARS-CoV-2 generated highly mutated variants, like omicron BA.1 and BA.2, able to escape natural and vaccine-induced primary immunity1,2. The administration of a third dose of mRNA vaccines induces a secondary response with increased protection. We investigated, at single-cell level, the longitudinal evolution of the neutralizing antibody response in four donors after three mRNA doses3. A total of 4,100 spike protein specific memory B cells were single cell sorted and 350 neutralizing antibodies were identified. The third dose increased the antibody neutralization potency and breadth against all SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern as previously observed with hybrid immunity3. However, the B cell repertoire that stands behind the response is dramatically different. The increased neutralizing response was largely due to the expansion of B cell germlines poorly represented after two doses, and the reduction of germlines predominant after primary immunization such as IGHV3-53;IGHJ6-1 and IGHV3-66;IGHJ4-1. Divergently to hybrid immunity, cross-protection after a third dose was mainly guided by Class 1/2 antibodies encoded by IGHV1-58;IGHJ3-1 and IGHV1-69;IGHJ4-1 germlines. The IGHV2-5;IGHJ3-1 germline, which induced broadly cross-reactive Class 3 antibodies after infection or viral vector vaccination, was not induced by a third mRNA dose. Our data show that while neutralizing breadth and potency can be improved by different immunization regimens, each of them has a unique molecular signature which should be considered while designing novel vaccines and immunization strategies.

immunology↗