bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

MacDonald, H. J.

Publications and source records attributed to MacDonald, H. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Dual-Coil Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Temporal Dynamics of Bilateral Corticomotor Excitability During Response Inhibition

A changing environment may suddenly require some parts of a multi-component response to be cancelled, while others continue. Such partial cancellation consistently produces a behavioural delay in the remaining component. This delay may reflect a three-step process of non-selective neural inhibition of all response components, functional uncoupling of components, and selective initiation of the remaining response. However, most neurophysiological evidence supporting this hypothesis has been recorded from muscles of a single hand, without direct comparison between response components. We aimed to simultaneously record - and therefore directly compare - corticomotor excitability (CME) in the cancelled and responding hands using a dual-coil technique not yet applied in this context. Human participants received transcranial magnetic stimulation to both primary motor cortices 1ms apart while performing a bimanual response inhibition task. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from both first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles as a measure of CME during partial cancellation. An equivalent reduction in CME was evident for both the responding and cancelled FDI muscles 175 ms after the stop cue during successful partial cancellation. The responding FDI subsequently exhibited an increase in CME above levels in the cancelled hand, leading to the unimanual response. This study reveals, for the first time, the temporal dynamics of CME for both response components simultaneously during a bimanual response inhibition task. Our results provide strong evidence that neural modulation during sudden partial cancellation can be viewed in light of the stop-change framework as a sequential non-selective stop, uncouple and switch, then selectively go process.

neuroscience↗

Exploring Stop Signal Reaction Time Over Two Sessions of the Anticipatory Response Inhibition Task

Various behavioural tasks can measure the motor component of impulse control, response inhibition. Response inhibition encompasses the ability to cancel unwanted actions and is evaluated via stop signal reaction time (SSRT). The current study explored the effect of two sessions on SSRT within the anticipatory response inhibition task (ARIT) and how this compared to the stop signal task (SST). Forty-four participants completed two sessions of the ARIT and SST, 24 hours apart. SSRT and its constituent measures (Go trial reaction time, stop signal delay) were calculated. SSRT reflecting non-selective inhibition was consistent between sessions in both tasks (both p > .293). Reaction time and stop signal delay also remained stable across sessions in the ARIT (all p > .063), whereas in the SST, both reaction time (p = .013) and stop signal delay (p = .009) increased. Across the two sessions, SSRT reflecting partial inhibition improved (p < .001), which was underpinned by changes to reaction time (p < .001) and stop signal delay (p < .001). The maximal efficiency of non-selective inhibition remained stable across two sessions in the ARIT. Results of the SST confirmed that non-selective inhibition can however be affected by more than inhibitory network integrity when Go trial reaction times are not constrained in task design. Partial response inhibition measures changed across sessions, suggesting the sequential process captured by the SSRT occurred more quickly in session two. These findings highlight the absence/extent of inherent SSRT changes possible during multiple-session study designs e.g., pre/post, or active/sham comparisons.

neuroscience↗