Optimizing High Parameter T Cell Immunophenotyping Through Direct Comparison of Conventional and Spectral Flow Cytometry
High-parameter flow cytometry is essential for dissecting the intricate landscape of T-cell diversity. In this study, we directly compare conventional flow cytometry (CFC) and spectral flow cytometry (SFC) for high-dimensional T-cell phenotyping, assessing how spectral detection and panel-design strategies influence analytical performance. Using peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy donors stained with both an established (v1) and an optimized (v2) fluorochrome-labelled antibody panel, and analyzed through manual gating and unsupervised approaches, we found that CFC reliably identified major T-cell subsets. However, spectral acquisition consistently delivered clear technical advantages, including improved signal-to-noise ratios, higher staining index values, and superior resolution of low-intensity and co-expressed markers. These improvements translated into more sharply delineated multidimensional clusters and a markedly enhanced resolution of T-cell differentiation states. Moreover, the optimized spectral panel enhanced the unsupervised detection of rare populations, such as cytotoxic CD4 T-cells (PD-1GZMB). However, despite the overall increase in data quality achieved with SFC, the selection of antibody clones may influence the measured frequencies of the identified populations. Finally, SFC - particularly when coupled with rational panel optimization and the use of advanced fluorophores - consistently delivers superior, higher-quality measurements and improved multidimensional resolution, thereby substantially enhancing the robustness and sensitivity of high-parameter T-cell phenotyping for comprehensive immunological studies.