bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Lucy, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Lucy, C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Designing enzymes for new-to-nature chemistry and non-natural substrates with AlphaProtein Novo

Creating highly active enzymes for arbitrary reactions is a transformative goal for the molecular sciences (1). Traditional protein engineering (2,3) is constrained by a reliance on existing natural starting points, which are often challenging to discover. De novo design offers the potential to overcome this by creating enzymes from first principles (4), but has yet to achieve practically relevant catalytic properties. Here we present AlphaProtein Novo (AP Novo), a machine-learning pipeline that demonstrates, for the first time, that de novo enzyme design can outperform natural sequence mining in addressing challenging chemistry. We used AP Novo to design new-to-nature nitrene transferases to synthesise the pharmacophore piperidine with unprecedented product selectivity, and to create enzymes that degrade the environmental toxin DEHP under conditions that denature natural enzymes. We also obtained state-of-the-art catalytic efficiencies on two well-studied model reactions, and through iterative design and analysis found that key enablers of success were mechanism-inspired metrics based on AlphaFold 3 predictions and sequence-ensemble-based scoring of designed backbones. Our results show that de novo design has become a powerful complement to natural enzyme diversity for discovering catalysts for a range of applications.

synthetic biology↗

Test-Retest Reliability of Task-based and Resting-state Blood Oxygen Level Dependence and Cerebral Blood Flow measures

Despite their wide-spread use, only limited information is available on the comparative test-retest reliability of task-based functional and resting state magnetic resonance imaging measures of blood oxygen level dependence (tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) using arterial spin labeling. This information is critical to designing properly powered longitudinal studies. Here we comprehensively quantified and compared the test-retest reliability and reproducibility performance of 8 commonly applied fMRI tasks, 6 rs-fMRI metrics and CBF in 30 healthy volunteers. We find large variability in test-retest reliability performance across the different tb-fMRI paradigms and rs-fMRI metrics, ranging from poor to excellent. A larger extent of activation in tb-fMRI is linked to higher between-subject reliability of the respective task suggesting that differences in the amount of activation may be used as a first reliability estimate of novel tb-fMRI paradigms. For rs-fMRI, a good reliability of local activity estimates is paralleled by poor performance of global connectivity metrics. Evaluated CBF measures provide in general a good to excellent test-reliability matching or surpassing the best performing tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI metrics. This comprehensive effort allows for direct comparisons of test-retest reliability between the evaluated MRI domains and measures to aid the design of future tb-fMRI, rs-fMRI and CBF studies.

neuroscience↗