bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Lubbock, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Lubbock, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Benchmarking siRNA Prediction: The Role of Representation and Validation Strategies

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) offer transformative potential for targeted therapeutics, yet the design of highly effective and non-toxic candidates is hindered by the risk of off-target effects and RNA instability. A critical flaw in in silico prediction models is pervasive data leakage in cross-validation protocols, which artificially inflates performance metrics and produces untrustworthy results. To address this, we developed a rigorous framework that eliminates data leakage through strict cross-validation, leverages z-curves (3D representations of RNA physico-chemical properties) for context-aware sequence encoding, and identifies key sequence regions critical for efficacy. Our model achieves an AUC of 0.845 on leakage-free validation, surpassing prior work at 380x faster computation speed, demonstrating that superior representation trumps model complexity. Crucially, we demonstrate how experimental variability and cross-validation choices directly impact model reliability, establishing the first benchmarked methods for robust siRNA efficacy prediction. This work provides a foundation for trustworthy sequence design and validation in RNA therapeutics.

bioinformatics↗

A comparison of clustering models for inference of T cell receptor antigen specificity

The vast potential sequence diversity of TCRs and their ligands has presented an historic barrier to computational prediction of TCR epitope specificity, a holy grail of quantitative immunology. One common approach is to cluster sequences together, on the assumption that similar receptors bind similar epitopes. Here, we provide an independent evaluation of widely used clustering algorithms for TCR specificity inference, observing some variability in predictive performance between models, and marked differences in scalability. Despite these differences, we find that different algorithms produce clusters with high degrees of similarity for receptors recognising the same epitope. Our analysis highlights an unmet need for improvement of complex models over a simple Hamming distance comparator, and strengthens the case for use of clustering models in TCR specificity inference.

immunology↗