Lu, T. J. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2020

Transient K+ current explains cross-species differences in the effects of myofibroblasts on myocytes

Electrical and paracrine couplings between cardiomyocytes (CMs) and myofibroblasts (MFBs) affect both physiology and pathophysiology of cardiac tissues in a range of animal models, but relating these observations to humans is a challenge because effects vary greatly across species. To address this challenge, we developed a mathematical model for mechanoelectrical interactions between CM and MFB, considering both electrical and paracrine couplings between CMs and MFBs, with the aim of identifying the sources of cross-species variation and extrapolating animal models to predicted effects in humans. Our results revealed substantial differences across species in how these couplings modulate excitation-contraction coupling and Ca2+ transients of CMs. Both classes of couplings prolong action potential and increase APD in rat CMs, but shorten action potential and decrease APD in human CMs. Electrical coupling attenuates Ca2+ transients and active tension generation in human CMs, but has no significant effect on rat CMs. Paracrine coupling reduces Ca2+ transients and active tension in both human and rat CM. The results suggest that the variance of functional interactions between CM and MFB in cross-species may be explained by differences in the transient outward K+ currents associated with the KCND2 gene, and thus suggest potential therapeutic pathways for fibrotic cardiomyopathy.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2020

Negative durotaxis: cell movement toward softer environments

Durotaxis - the ability of cells to sense and migrate along stiffness gradients - is important for embryonic development and has been implicated in pathologies including fibrosis and cancer. Although cellular processes can sometimes turn toward softer environments, durotaxis at the level of cells has thus far been observed exclusively as migration from soft to stiff regions. The molecular basis of durotaxis, especially the factors that contribute to different durotactic behaviors in various cell types, are still inadequately understood. With the recent discovery of optimal stiffness, where cells generate maximal traction forces on substrates in an intermediate stiffness range, we hypothesized that some migratory cells may be capable of moving away from stiff environments and toward matrix on which they can generate more traction. Combining hydrogel-based stiffness gradients, live-cell imaging, genetic manipulations, and computational modeling, we found that cells move preferentially toward their stiffness optimum for maximal force transmission. Importantly, we directly observed biased migration toward softer environments, i.e. negative durotaxis, in human glioblastoma cells. This directional migration did not coincide with changes in FAK, ERK or YAP signaling, or with altered actomyosin contractility. Instead, integrin-mediated adhesion and motor-clutch dynamics alone are sufficient to generate asymmetric traction to drive both positive and negative durotaxis. We verified this mechanistically by applying a motor-clutch-based model to explain negative durotaxis in the glioblastoma cells and in neurites, and experimentally by switching breast cancer cells from positive to negative durotaxis via talin downregulation. Our results identify the likely molecular mechanisms of durotaxis, with a cells contractile and adhesive machinery dictating its capacity to exert traction on mechanically distinct substrates, directing cell migration.

biophysics↗