bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Lu, R. J.-H.

Publications and source records attributed to Lu, R. J.-H..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Differential chromatin accessibility and transcriptional dynamics define breast cancer subtypes and their lineages

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and treatment is guided by biomarker profiles representing distinct molecular subtypes. Breast cancer arises from the breast ductal epithelium, and experimental data suggests breast cancer subtypes have different cells of origin within that lineage. The precise cells of origin for each subtype and the transcriptional networks that characterize these tumor-normal lineages are not established. In this work, we applied bulk, single-cell (sc), and single-nucleus (sn) multi-omic techniques as well as spatial transcriptomics and multiplex imaging on 61 samples from 37 breast cancer patients to show characteristic links in gene expression and chromatin accessibility between breast cancer subtypes and their putative cells of origin. We applied the PAM50 subtyping algorithm in tandem with bulk RNA-seq and snRNA-seq to reliably subtype even low-purity tumor samples and confirm promoter accessibility using snATAC. Trajectory analysis of chromatin accessibility and differentially accessible motifs clearly connected progenitor populations with breast cancer subtypes supporting the cell of origin for basal-like and luminal A and B tumors. Regulatory network analysis of transcription factors underscored the importance of BHLHE40 in luminal breast cancer and luminal mature cells, and KLF5 in basal-like tumors and luminal progenitor cells. Furthermore, we identify key genes defining the basal-like (PRKCA, SOX6, RGS6, KCNQ3) and luminal A/B (FAM155A, LRP1B) lineages, with expression in both precursor and cancer cells and further upregulation in tumors. Exhausted CTLA4-expressing CD8+ T cells were enriched in basal-like breast cancer, suggesting altered means of immune dysfunction among breast cancer subtypes. We used spatial transcriptomics and multiplex imaging to provide spatial detail for key markers of benign and malignant cell types and immune cell colocation. These findings demonstrate analysis of paired transcription and chromatin accessibility at the single cell level is a powerful tool for investigating breast cancer lineage development and highlight transcriptional networks that define basal and luminal breast cancer lineages.

cancer biology↗

The histone variant H2A.W cooperates with chromatin modifications and linker histone H1 to maintain transcriptional silencing of transposons in Arabidopsis

Transposable elements (TEs) are marked by a complex array of chromatin modifications, but a central unifying mechanism for how they are silenced remains elusive. Histone H3 Lysine 9 methylation (H3K9me) is an important component of heterochromatin in most eukaryotes, including plants. In flowering plants, the specialized histone variant H2A.W occupies nucleosomes found at TE sequences. This variant is deposited by the chromatin remodeler DDM1 and confers specific biophysical properties to the nucleosomes. Here we use genetic and genomic strategies to evaluate the role of H2A.W in transposon silencing in Arabidopsis. Compared with mutants lacking either H2A.W or H3K9me, the combined loss of both H2A.W and H3K9me causes a dramatic increase in both the number of expressed TEs and their expression levels. Synergistic effects are also observed when H2A.W is lost in combination with histone H1 or CH methylation. Collectively, these TEs are also upregulated in mutants lacking DDM1, which are impaired in H2A.W deposition and lose heterochromatic marks. We conclude that H2A.W acts in combination with different elements of heterochromatin to maintain silencing across a large spectrum of TEs present primarily in pericentric heterochromatin in Arabidopsis. In mammals, the DDM1 ortholog LSH deposits macroH2A to heterochromatin and silences TEs. We thus propose that specialized H2A variants localized to heterochromatin interact with a complex array of histone modifications to silence TEs in eukaryotes.

genomics↗

Mycena genomes resolve the evolution of fungal bioluminescence

Mushroom-forming fungi in the order Agaricales represent an independent origin of bioluminescence in the tree of life, yet the diversity, evolutionary history, and timing of the origin of fungal luciferases remain elusive. We sequenced the genomes and transcriptomes of five bonnet mushroom species (Mycena spp.), a diverse lineage comprising the majority of bioluminescent fungi. Two species with haploid genome assemblies [~]150Mb are amongst the largest in Agaricales, and we found that a variety of repeats between Mycena species were differentially mediated by DNA methylation. We show that bioluminescence evolved in the last common ancestor of mycenoid and the marasmioid clade of Agaricales and was maintained through at least 160 million years of evolution. Analyses of synteny across genomes of bioluminescent species resolved how the luciferase cluster was derived by duplication and translocation, frequently rearranged and lost in most Mycena species, but conserved in the Armillaria lineage. Luciferase cluster members were co-expressed across developmental stages, with highest expression in fruiting body caps and stipes, suggesting fruiting-related adaptive functions. Our results contribute to understanding a de novo origin of bioluminescence and the corresponding gene cluster in a diverse group of enigmatic fungal species. SignificanceWe present the genomes of five new bonnet mushroom Mycena species, formerly the last fungal bioluminescent lineage lacking reference genomes. These genome-scale datasets allowed us to construct an evolutionary model pinpointing all possible changes in the luciferase cluster across all fungi and additional genes involved in bioluminescence. We show that luciferase clusters were differentially lost in different fungal lineages and in particular a substantial loss was observed in the Mycena lineage. This can be attributed to genome regions of Mycena underwent different evolutionary dynamics. Our findings offer insights into the evolution of how a gene cluster that emerged 160 million years ago and was frequently lost or maintained due to differences in genome plasticity.

genomics↗