Biology subjects

Londhe, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Londhe, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Functional gene embeddings improve rare variant polygenic risk scores

Rare variant association testing is a powerful strategy for identifying effector genes underlying common traits. However, its effectiveness is limited by the scarcity of high-impact rare allele carriers, posing challenges for sensitivity and robustness. Here, we introduce FuncRVP, a rare variant association framework addressing this issue by leveraging functional information across genes. FuncRVP models the effects of rare variants as a weighted sum of gene impairment scores, with weights regularized through a prior based on functional gene embeddings. Modeling 41 quantitative traits from unrelated UK Biobank participants showed that FuncRVP consistently outperformed linear regressions on significantly associated genes and did so more effectively for traits with higher burden heritability. The framework demonstrated versatility, yielding consistent improvements across diverse gene embeddings. Moreover, FuncRVP generated more robust gene effect estimates and yielded more gene discoveries, especially among genetically constrained genes. These findings demonstrate the value of integrating functional information in rare variant association studies and showcase FuncRVP as a promising tool for enhancing phenotype prediction and gene discovery.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2023

A Systematic Benchmark of Machine Learning Methods for Protein-RNA Interaction Prediction

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWRNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are central actors of RNA post-transcriptional regulation. Experiments to profile binding sites of RBPs in vivo are limited to transcripts expressed in the experimental cell type, creating the need for computational methods to infer missing binding information. While numerous machine-learning based methods have been developed for this task, their use of heterogeneous training and evaluation datasets across different sets of RBPs and CLIP-seq protocols makes a direct comparison of their performance difficult. Here, we compile a set of 37 machine learning (primarily deep learning) methods for in vivo RBP-RNA interaction prediction and systematically benchmark a subset of 11 representative methods across hundreds of CLIP-seq datasets and RBPs. Using homogenized sample pre-processing and two negative-class sample generation strategies, we evaluate methods in terms of predictive performance and assess the impact of neural network architectures and input modalities on model performance. We believe that this study will not only enable researchers to choose the optimal prediction method for their tasks at hand, but also aid method developers in developing novel, high-performing methods by introducing a standardized framework for their evaluation.

bioinformatics↗