bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Llimos, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Llimos, G..

1 recordsLinked to original sources

The miR-96/RARγ signaling axis governs androgen signaling and PCa progression

Expression levels of retinoic acid receptor gamma (NR1B3/RARG, encodes RAR{gamma}), are commonly reduced in prostate cancer (PCa). Therefore we sought to establish the cellular and gene regulatory consequences of reduced RAR{gamma} expression, and determine RAR{gamma} regulatory mechanisms. RARG shRNA approaches in non-malignant (RWPE-1 and HPr1-AR) and malignant (LNCaP) prostate models revealed that reducing RAR{gamma} levels, rather than adding exogenous retinoid ligand, had the greatest impact on prostate cell viability and gene expression. ChIP-Seq defined the RAR{gamma} cistrome which was significantly enriched at active enhancers associated with AR binding sites. Reflecting a significant genomic role for RAR{gamma} to regulate androgen signaling, RAR{gamma} knockdown in HPr1-AR cells significantly regulated the magnitude of the AR transcriptome. RAR{gamma} down-regulation was explained by increased miR-96 in PCa cell and mouse models, and TCGA PCa cohorts. Biochemical approaches confirmed that miR-96 directly regulated RAR{gamma} expression and function Capture of the miR-96 targetome by biotin-miR96 identified that RAR{gamma} and a number of RAR{gamma} interacting co-factors including TACC1 were all targeted by miR-96, and expression of these genes were prominently altered, positively and negatively, in the TCGA-PRAD cohort. Differential gene expression analyses between tumors in the TCGA-PRAD cohort with lower quartile expression levels of RARG and TACC1 and upper quartile miR-96, compared to the reverse, identified a gene network including several RAR{gamma} target genes (e.g. SOX15) that significantly associated with worse disease free survival (hazard ratio 2.23, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.88, p=0.015). In summary, miR-96 targets a RAR{gamma} network to govern AR signaling, PCa progression and disease outcome.\n\nConflict of interestThe authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.\n\nFUNDINGLESC acknowledges support, in part, of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center-University of Pittsburg Cancer Institute Ovarian Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence National Institutes of Health [P50CA159981-01A1].\n\nMDL acknowledges support of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics NRSA T32 program [T32CA009072] held at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center.\n\nMJC and DJS acknowledges support in part from the Prostate program of the Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs [W81XWH-14-1-0608, W81XWH-11-2-0033] and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) grant P30CA016056 involving the use of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Centers Genomic Shared Resource.\n\nMJC, GL, AR, HW and PvdB acknowledges support from the European Union-United States Atlantis Program [P116J090011].\n\nMJC and LESC acknowledge support from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) grant P30CA016056 involving the use of OSUCCC The James, CCSG P30CA016058

cancer biology