bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Liza, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Liza, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparable phosphene size and contrast properties, but differing detection reliability for optogenetic versus electrical stimulation of macaque V1

Cortical visual prostheses aim to restore vision by stimulating primary visual cortex (V1) to evoke artificial percepts (phosphenes). Electrical stimulation has long served this purpose, and optogenetic approaches promise higher spatial resolution via cell-type specificity. Recent investigations have demonstrated localized behavioral responses to optogenetic V1 stimulation (1--3), but the applied perimetry paradigms cannot dissociate a genuine percept from a reflexive oculomotor response, leaving the perceptual character of optogenetic phosphenes unresolved. To address this gap, two macaques received optogenetic V1 injections guided by laminar electrophysiology and performed detection and discrimination tasks under interleaved electrical, optogenetic, and visual stimulation, enabling direct within-subject comparison. Electrical stimulation reliably evoked detectable percepts (positive d' in 100% of sessions), with thresholds scaling with current, resembling visual contrast-response functions. Optogenetic stimulation was far less reliable, with positive d' in only ~50% of sessions, despite confirmed V1 activation. Despite this reliability difference, optogenetically evoked percepts closely resembled electrically and visually evoked percepts in perceptual character: perceived size (~1{degrees} of visual angle) was comparable across conditions and scaled similarly with eccentricity. Similarly, perceived contrast equivalents (5%-11% visual-contrast equivalent) were broadly comparable across stimulation approaches. These findings indicate that successful optogenetic activation engages the same perceptual encoding mechanisms as electrical and natural vision, but that reliable detection may additionally depend on circuit-level mechanisms not consistently engaged by current optogenetic parameters. The comparable percept size further suggests optogenetic stimulation may not confer the enhanced spatial resolution often proposed as its key advantage.

neuroscience↗

Local interactions between steady-state visually evoked potentials at nearby flickering frequencies

Steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP) are widely used to index top-down cognitive processing in human electroencephalogram (EEG) studies. Typically, two stimuli flickering at different temporal frequencies (TFs) are presented, each producing a distinct response in the EEG at its flicker frequency. However, how SSVEP responses in EEG are modulated in the presence of a competing flickering stimulus just due to sensory interactions is not well understood. We have previously shown in local field potentials (LFP) recorded from awake monkeys that when two overlapping full screen gratings are counter-phased at different TFs, there is an asymmetric SSVEP response suppression, with greater suppression from lower TFs, which further depends on the relative orientations of the gratings (stronger suppression and asymmetry for parallel compared to orthogonal gratings). Here, we first confirmed these effects in both male and female human EEG recordings. Then, we mapped the response suppression of one stimulus (target) by a competing stimulus (mask) over a much wider range than the previous study. Surprisingly, we found that the suppression was not stronger at low frequencies in general, but systematically varied depending on the target TF, indicating local interactions between the two competing stimuli. These results were confirmed in both human EEG and monkey LFP and electrocorticogram (ECoG) data. Our results show that sensory interactions between multiple SSVEPs are more complex than shown previously and are influenced by both local and global factors, underscoring the need to cautiously interpret the results of studies involving SSVEP paradigms.

neuroscience↗