bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Liu, Z.-Q. I.

Publications and source records attributed to Liu, Z.-Q. I..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Benchmarking macaque gene expression for horizontal and vertical translation

The spatial patterning of gene expression shapes cortical organization and emergent function. Advances in spatial transcriptomics make it possible to comprehensively map cortical gene expression in both humans and model organisms. The macaque is a particularly valuable model organism, due to its evolutionary similarity with the human. The translational potential of macaque gene expression rests on the assumption that it is a good proxy for spatial patterns of corresponding proteins (vertical translation) and for spatial patterns of ortholog human genes (horizontal translation). Here we systematically benchmark the spatial distribution of gene expression in the macaque cortex against (a) cortical receptor density in the macaque and (b) cortical gene expression in the human. We find that there is moderate cortex-wide correspondence between gene expression and protein density in the macaque, which is improved by considering layer-specific gene expression. We find greater correspondence between orthologous gene expression in the macaque and human. Inter-species correspondence of gene expression exhibits systematic regional heterogeneity, with greater correspondence in unimodal than transmodal cortex, mapping onto patterns of evolutionary cortical expansion. We extend these results to additional micro-architectural features using macaque immunohistochemistry and T1w:T2w ratio, and replicate them using macaque RNA-seq and human RNA-seq gene expression. Collectively, the present results showcase both the potential and limitations of macaque spatial transcriptomics as an engine of translational discovery within and across species.

neuroscience↗

Converging on consistent functional connectomics

Functional interactions between brain regions can be viewed as a network, empowering neuroscientists to leverage network science to investigate distributed brain function. However, obtaining a brain network from functional neuroimaging data involves multiple steps of data manipulation, which can drastically affect the organisation and validity of the estimated brain network and its properties. Here, we provide a systematic evaluation of 576 unique data-processing pipelines for functional connectomics from resting-state functional MRI, obtained from all possible recombinations of popular choices for brain atlas type and size, connectivity definition and selection, and global signal regression. We use the portrait divergence, an information-theoretic measure of differences in network topology across scales, to quantify the influence of analytic choices on the overall organisation of the derived functional connectome. We evaluate each pipeline across an entire battery of criteria, seeking pipelines that (i) minimise spurious test-retest discrepancies of network topology, while simultaneously (ii) mitigating motion confounds, and being sensitive to both (iii) inter-subject differences and (iv) experimental effects of interest, as demonstrated by propofol-induced general anaesthesia. Our findings reveal vast and systematic variability across pipelines suitability for functional connectomics. Choice of the wrong data-processing pipeline can lead to results that are not only misleading, but systematically so, distorting the functional connectome more drastically than the passage of several months. We also found that the majority of pipelines failed to meet at least one of our criteria. However, we identified 8 candidates satisfying all criteria across each of four independent datasets spanning minutes, weeks, and months, ensuring the generalisability of our recommendations. Our results also generalise to alternative acquisition parameters and preprocessing and denoising choices. By providing the community with a full breakdown of each pipelines performance across this multi-dataset, multi-criteria, multi-scale and multi-step approach, we establish a comprehensive set of benchmarks to inform future best practices in functional connectomics.

neuroscience↗