UV inactivation of bacteria and viruses on surfaces: mechanistic insights and testing method comparisons
Germicidal UV devices offer a promising solution to mitigate surface-mediated pathogen transmission, providing effective disinfection without material corrosion. This study evaluated the surface inactivation kinetics of two bacteria and two bacteriophages using a low-pressure (LP) mercury UV lamp (254 nm) and a filtered krypton chloride (KrCl*) excimer lamp (222 nm). Three deposition methods (Spray, Spread, and Pipette) and two extraction methods (Swab and Elute) were compared. The UV dose response on surfaces followed a two-region non-linear model due to shielding from dried deposition constituents, primarily through UV absorption. KrCl* excimer exhibited similar bacterial inactivation but slightly lower viral inactivation than LP UV lamp (maximum inactivation [~] 1 log lower), but its safety profile makes it compelling in occupied spaces. Compared to aqueous conditions, bacteria were more UV sensitive on surfaces, whereas viruses were more resistant. The deposition methods affected the inactivation results, with the Spray method resulting in higher bacteria inactivation. While the extraction methods had limited effect on inactivation efficacy, the Swab method provided higher inactivation detection limits ([~] 2 log higher) and more consistent extraction efficiency. This study provides mechanistic insights into the effects of deposition conditions, UV wavelengths, and microbial characteristics on UV surface disinfection and contributes to standardization of testing methods. TOC Graphic O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=104 SRC="FIGDIR/small/734141v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (24K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12d6656org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@199a2f6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@199f168org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b7f727_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG