bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Lightfoot, S. H.

Publications and source records attributed to Lightfoot, S. H..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Chronic THC vapor rescues inflammation-related thermal hyperalgesia and causes cell type-specific modifications in vlPAG neurons

AbstractIn an effort to reduce reliance on opioids for the treatment of pain in the clinic, ongoing work is testing the utility of cannabinoid drugs as a potential alternative for treatment of chronic pain. We tested chronic THC vapor inhalation effects on thermal nociception and mechanical sensitivity, as well as midbrain (i.e., ventrolateral periaqueductal gray [vlPAG]) neuronal function, in adult male and female Wistar rats with chronic inflammatory pain (CFA treatment). We report that chronic THC vapor inhalation rescues both thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical hypersensitivity in males treated with CFA, but only thermal hyperalgesia in CFA females. Most of the anti-hyperalgesic effects of chronic THC vapor were still observable 24 hours after cessation of the last THC exposure. We also report that chronic THC vapor inhalation modulates intrinsic and synaptic properties of vlPAG neurons, including reductions in action potential firing rate and spontaneous inhibitory synaptic transmission in males, and that these effects occur specifically in neurons that respond to current input with a "delayed" firing phenotype. Treatment with CFA led to increased firing rate and increased sIPSC amplitude in vlPAG neurons of female rats, and chronic THC vapor rescued sIPSC amplitudes to control levels - these effects were specific to vlPAG neurons categorized as having an "onset" firing phenotype. Ongoing work is exploring sex-specific mechanisms (e.g., CB1 receptor) of THC vapor rescue effects in the vlPAG of rats treated with CFA, and further exploring the vlPAG cell types impacted by CFA treatment and chronic THC vapor inhalation. Significance StatementMany adults in the U.S. with pain self-medicate with THC and cannabis, and many humans use e-cigarette type devices filled with cannabis extracts to self-administer THC and other constituents of the marijuana plant. Until recently, most rodent studies of THC effects on brain and behavior have used injection procedures and male rats. Here, we tested the effect of chronic THC vapor inhalation on pain-related behaviors and midbrain neural circuit function in adult male and female Wistar rats. As predicted, chronic THC vapor inhalation rescued chronic inflammatory pain effects on behavior and midbrain neuronal function.

neuroscience↗

Pharmacokinetics and Central Accumulation of Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and its Bioactive Metabolites are Influenced by Route of Administration and Sex

Up to a third of North Americans over 16 years old report using cannabis in the prior month, most commonly through inhalation. Animal models that reflect human cannabis consumption are critical to study its impacts on brain and behaviour. Nevertheless, most animal studies to date examine effects of cannabis through injection of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; primary psychoactive component of cannabis). THC injections produce markedly different physiological and behavioural effects than inhalation, likely due to distinctive pharmacokinetics of each administration route. The current study directly examined if administration route (injection versus inhalation), with dosing being matched on peak THC blood levels, alters the metabolism of THC, and the central accumulation of THC and its metabolites over time. Adult male and female Sprague-Dawley rats received either a single intraperitoneal injection of THC (2.5 mg/kg) or a single (15 min) session of inhaled exposure to THC distillate (100 mg/mL) vapour. Blood and brains were collected at 15, 30, 60, 90 and 240 minutes post-exposure for analysis of THC and metabolites through mass spectrometry-liquid chromatography. Inhalation results in immediate hypothermia, whereas injection results in delayed hypothermia. Despite achieving comparable peak concentrations of blood THC in both groups, our results indicate higher initial brain THC concentration following inhalation, whereas injection resulted in dramatically higher 11-OH-THC concentrations, a potent THC metabolite, in blood and brain that increased over time. Our results provide evidence that THC and its metabolites exhibit different pharmacokinetic profiles following inhalation versus injection, which could have significant impacts for data interpretation and generalizability. Accordingly, we suggest that translational work in the realm of THC and cannabis strongly consider using inhalation models over those that employ injection. HighlightsO_LIBody temperature as well as blood and brain levels of THC and metabolites differ based on administration route C_LIO_LITHC inhalation results in immediate hypothermia, whereas THC injection results in delayed hypothermia C_LIO_LITHC inhalation results in higher initial brain THC levels than injection C_LIO_LITHC injection results in higher blood & brain 11-OH-THC levels than inhalation C_LIO_LITranslational cannabis work should strongly consider using inhalation over injection C_LI

neuroscience↗