Biology subjects

Liegeois, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Liegeois, S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Distinct Bomanins at the Drosophila 55C locus function in resistance and resilience to infections

Host defense against many Gram-positive bacteria and fungal pathogens is mainly provided by the Toll-dependent systemic immune response in Drosophila. While antimicrobial peptides active against these categories of pathogens contribute only modestly to protection, Bomanin peptides are major effectors of the Toll pathway. Remarkably, flies deleted for the 55C locus that contains 10 Bomanin genes are as sensitive as Toll pathway mutant flies to these infections. Yet, the exact functions of single Bomanins in resistance or resilience to infections remain poorly characterized. Here, we have extensively studied the role of these Bomanin genes. BomT1 functions in resistance to Enterococcus faecalis while playing a role in resilience against Metarhizium robertsii infection, like BomS2. BomT1 and BomT2 prevent the dissemination of Candida albicans throughout the host, even though they are not sufficient to confer protection to immunodeficient flies against this pathogen in survival experiments. Furthermore, BomT1 and BomBc1 mutants are sensitive to an Aspergillus fumigatus ribotoxin. We conclude that 55C Bomanins have defined albeit sometimes overlapping roles in the different facets of host defense against infections.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2023

A specific innate immune response silences the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a latent infection model in the Drosophila melanogaster host

Microbial pathogenicity often depends on the route of infection. For instance, P. aeruginosa or S. marcescens cause acute systemic infections when low numbers of bacteria are injected into D. melanogaster flies whereas flies succumb much slower to the continuous ingestion of these pathogens, even though both manage to escape from the gut compartment and reach the hemocoel. Here, we have developed a latent P. aeruginosa infection model by feeding flies on the bacteria for a short period. The bacteria stably colonize internal tissues yet hardly cause any damage since latently-infected flies live almost as long as noninfected control flies. The apparently dormant bacteria display particular characteristics in terms of bacterial colony morphology, composition of the outer cell wall, and motility. The virulence of these bacteria can however be reactivated upon wounding the host. We show that melanization but not the cellular or the systemic humoral response is the predominant host defense that establishes latency and may coerce the bacteria to a dormant state. In addition, the lasting activation of the melanization responses in latently-infected flies provides a degree of protection to the host against a secondary fungal infection. Latent infections by an ingested pathogen protects against a variety of homologous or heterologous systemic secondary infectious challenges, a situation previously described for the endosymbiotic Wolbachia bacteria, a guard against viral infections.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2020

The BaramicinA gene is required at several steps of the host defense against Enterococcus faecalis and Metarhizium robertsii in a septic wound infection model in Drosophila melanogaster

The Drosophila systemic immune response against many Gram-positive bacteria and fungi is mediated by the Toll pathway. How Toll-regulated effectors actually fulfill this role remains poorly understood as the known antimicrobial peptide (AMP) genes it controls are essentially active only against filamentous fungi and not against Gram-positive bacteria or yeasts. BaramicinA gene expression is transcriptionally regulated by the Toll pathway. BaraA encodes a polyprotein precursor that releases processed proteins into the hemolymph upon immune challenge. Here, we demonstrate that BaraA is required specifically in the host defense against Enterococcus faecalis and against the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium robertsii. It does so by protecting the fly from the action of distinct toxins secreted by Gram-positive and fungal pathogens but not by directly attacking them. Thus, in complement to the current paradigm, innate immunity can cope with toxins, effectively, through the secretion of peptides that are not AMPs, independently of xenobiotics detoxification pathways.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2017

RhlR, but not RhlI, allows P. aeruginosa bacteria to evade Drosophila Tep4- mediated opsonization

When Drosophila flies feed on Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14, some bacteria cross the intestinal barrier and start proliferating inside the hemocoel. This process is limited by hemocytes through phagocytosis. We have previously shown that the PA14 quorum-sensing regulator RhlR is required for these bacteria to elude the cellular immune response. RhlI synthesizes the auto-inducer signal that activates RhlR. Here, we compare the null mutant phenotypes of rhlR and rhlI in a variety of infection assays in Drosophila and in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Surprisingly, in Drosophila, unlike{Delta} rhlR mutants,{Delta} rhlI mutants are only modestly attenuated for virulence and are poorly phagocytosed and opsonized in a Thioester-containing Protein4-dependent manner. Likewise, {Delta}rhlI but not {Delta}rhlR mutants colonize the digestive tract of C. elegans and kill it as efficiently as wild-type PA14. Thus, RhlR has an RhlI-independent function in eluding detection or counter-acting the action of the immune system. In contrast to the intestinal infection model, Tep4 mutant flies are more resistant to PA14 in a septic injury model, which also depends on rhlR. Thus, the Tep4 putative opsonin can either be protective or detrimental to host defense depending on the infection route.

immunology↗