Biology subjects

Liebhold, A. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Liebhold, A. M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Species traits shape the intercontinental introduction patterns of bark and ambrosia beetles

O_LIA negative consequence of international trade is the accidental transport of non-native insect species to non-native regions, but our understanding of how this risk varies among species and how it relates to species traits remains incomplete. C_LIO_LIWe conducted a multi-continental analysis of historical border interception records for bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae), integrating 13,124 interception events (353 species) from Canada, Chile, Japan, New Zealand, and the United States. We estimated an intercontinental propagule pressure index and tested how species characteristics influence transport likelihood. C_LIO_LIInterception assemblages showed low similarity among countries, with 64% of species recorded in only one nation, indicating strong geographic structuring linked to trade pathways. Interceptions were taxonomically and biogeographically non-random: species native to the Palearctic Nearctic and Indo-Malayan regions were overrepresented, whereas Neotropical, Austro-Pacific and Afrotropical taxa were underrepresented. C_LIO_LIHost tree taxa emerged as the strongest predictor of propagule pressure. Species associated with conifers--particularly Pinaceae--exhibited approximately twice the propagule pressure of species restricted to broadleaved hosts. Ambrosia beetles showed higher propagule pressure than bark and twig/seed feeders. Propagule pressure also increased with the number of regions where species have already invaded, consistent with bridgehead dynamics. C_LIO_LISynthesis and applications: Our findings demonstrate that intercontinental transport of bark and ambrosia beetles is strongly structured by host associations, feeding guild, and biogeographic origin, reflecting the composition of traded commodities and historical trade networks. Identifying taxa with consistently high propagule pressure provides a basis for prioritizing surveillance and strengthening global forest biosecurity. C_LI

ecology↗

bioRxiv2023

Drivers of asymmetrical insect invasions between three world regions

The geographical exchange of non-native insects can be highly asymmetrical, with some world regions exporting or importing more species than others. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain such asymmetries, including differences in propagule pressure, environmental features in recipient regions, or biological traits of invaders. We tested aspects of these hypotheses in the context of the exchange of non-native insects between North America, Europe, and Australasia. Europe was the dominant exporter of non-native insect species between the three regions, with most of this asymmetry arising prior to 1950. The European dominance could not be explained by differences in import value, source species pool sizes, or native plant richness in the recipient regions. We identified that the introduction of non-native plants, driven in part by European colonization, best explains the asymmetrical exchange of non-native insects between our focal regions.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2022

Fewer non-native insects in freshwater than in terrestrial habitats across continents

AimBiological invasions are a major threat to biodiversity in both aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Insects represent an important group of species in freshwater and terrestrial habitats, and they constitute a large proportion of non-native species. However, while many non-native insects are known from terrestrial ecosystems, it remains unclear how they are represented in freshwater habitats. Comparisons of the richness of invaders relative to the richness of native species between freshwater and terrestrial habitats are scarce, which hinders syntheses of invasion processes. Here, we used data from three regions on different continents to determine whether non-native insects are under- or overrepresented in freshwater compared to terrestrial assemblages. LocationEurope, North America, New Zealand MethodsWe compiled a comprehensive inventory of the native and non-native insect species established in freshwater and terrestrial habitats of the three study regions. We then contrasted the richness of non-native and native species among freshwater and terrestrial insects for all insect orders in each region. Using binomial regression, we analysed the proportions of non-native species in freshwater and terrestrial habitats across the three regions. ResultsIn most insect orders living in freshwater, non-native species were under-represented, while they were over-represented in a number of terrestrial orders. This pattern occurred in purely aquatic orders as well as in orders with both freshwater and terrestrial species. Overall, the proportion of non-native species was significantly lower in freshwater than in terrestrial species. Main conclusionsDespite the numerical and ecological importance of insects among all non-native species, non-native insect species are surprisingly rare in freshwater habitats, and this pattern is consistent across the three investigated study regions. We briefly review hypotheses concerning species traits and invasion pathways that are most likely to explain these patterns. Our findings contribute to a growing appreciation of drivers and impacts of biological invasions.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2021

Alternative futures for global biological invasions

Scenario analysis has emerged as a key tool to analyze complex and uncertain future socio-ecological developments. However, current global scenarios (narratives of how the world may develop) have neglected biological invasions, a major threat to biodiversity and the economy. We used a novel participatory process to develop a diverse set of global biological invasion scenarios spanning a wide breadth of plausible global futures through 2050. We adapted the widely used "two axes" scenario analysis approach to develop four families of four scenarios each, resulting in 16 scenarios that were later clustered into four contrasting sets of futures. Our analysis highlighted that socio-economic developments and changes in sustainability policies and lifestyle have the potential to shape biological invasions, in addition to well-known ecological drivers, such as climate and human land use change. Our scenarios align fairly well with the recently developed shared socio-economic pathways, but the factors that drive differences in biological invasions are underrepresented there. Including these factors in global scenarios and models is essential to adequately consider biological invasions in global environmental assessments, and obtain a more integrative picture of future socio-ecological developments.

ecology↗