bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Li, J. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Li, J. B..

11 recordsLinked to original sources

ADAR1p150 RNA binding, independent of A-to-I RNA editing, buffers immunogenicity from the tonic type I IFN induced transcriptome in vivo.

ADAR1 edits adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) in double-stranded RNA to prevent MDA5 sensing of cellular transcripts, its key physiological role. However, editing-independent functions of ADAR1 remain poorly understood. Using a series of Adar1 mutant mice rescued by loss of MDA5 and PKR, we investigated isoform-specific, editing-independent roles of ADAR1 in vivo. We found that the cytoplasmic ADAR1p150 isoform is essential for maintaining peripheral T cell numbers and differentiation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). In bone marrow transplants, ADAR1p150 protein, but not its editing activity, was crucial for T cell regeneration and HSPC repopulation, demonstrating a cell-intrinsic function in hematopoiesis. Experiments with IFN{beta}-treatment of purified HSPCs in vitro and in vivo IFNAR1 neutralization revealed hypersensitivity to tonic type I interferon (IFN) in the absence of ADAR1p150. Using cell lines, we demonstrate that type I IFN activates the OAS-RNaseL pathway, leading to cell death. This study shows that tonic type I IFN induces immunogenic cellular RNAs in sterile conditions. ADAR1p150 suppresses immune sensing of self-dsRNAs through both editing-dependent (MDA5) and editing-independent (PKR, OAS-RNaseL) mechanisms. Thus, ADAR1p150 protein levels and activity combine to set the threshold for tolerance to self-derived dsRNAs.

immunology↗

Smooth muscle expression of RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 controls vascular integrity and progression of atherosclerosis

Mapping the genomic architecture of complex disease has been predicated on the understanding that genetic variants influence disease risk through modifying gene expression. However, recent discoveries have revealed that a significant burden of disease heritability in common autoinflammatory disorders and coronary artery disease (CAD) is mediated through genetic variation modifying post-transcriptional modification of RNA through adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing. This common RNA modification is catalyzed by ADAR enzymes, where ADAR1 edits specific immunogenic double stranded RNA (dsRNA) to prevent activation of the double strand RNA (dsRNA) sensor MDA5 (IFIH1) and stimulation of an interferon stimulated gene (ISG) response. Multiple lines of human genetic data indicate impaired RNA editing and increased dsRNA sensing by MDA5 to be an important mechanism of CAD risk. Here, we provide a crucial link between observations in human genetics and mechanistic cell biology leading to progression of CAD. Through analysis of human atherosclerotic plaque and culture of human coronary artery vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) we implicate the SMC to have a distinct requirement for RNA editing, and that MDA5 activation regulates SMC phenotypic modulation. Through generation of a conditional SMC specific Adar1 deletion mouse model on a pro-atherosclerosis background with additional constitutive deletion of MDA5 (Ifih1), and with incorporation of single cell RNA sequencing cellular profiling, we further show that Adar1 controls SMC phenotypic state by regulating Mda5 activation, is required to maintain vascular integrity, and controls progression of atherosclerosis and vascular calcification. Finally, we further corroborate our findings in a large human carotid endarterectomy dataset (Athero-Express) where we show that ISG activation is strongly associated with decreased plaque stability, increased SMC phenotypic modulation, and increased plaque calcification. Through this work, we describe a fundamental mechanism of CAD, where cell type and context specific RNA editing and sensing of dsRNA mediates disease progression, bridging our understanding of human genetics and disease causality. One Sentence SummarySmooth muscle expression of RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 regulates activation of double strand RNA sensor MDA5 in novel mechanism of atherosclerosis.

genomics↗

ADAR1p150 Prevents MDA5 and PKR Activation via Distinct Mechanisms to Avert Fatal Autoinflammation

Effective immunity requires the innate immune system to distinguish foreign (non-self) nucleic acids from cellular (self) nucleic acids. Cellular double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) are edited by the RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 to prevent their dsRNA structure pattern being recognized as viral dsRNA by cytoplasmic dsRNA sensors including MDA5, PKR and ZBP1. A loss of ADAR1-mediated RNA editing of cellular dsRNA activates MDA5. However, additional RNA editing-independent functions of ADAR1 have been proposed, but a specific mechanism has not been delineated. We now demonstrate that the loss of ADAR1-mediated RNA editing specifically activates MDA5, while loss of the cytoplasmic ADAR1p150 isoform or its dsRNA binding activity enabled PKR activation. Deleting both MDA5 and PKR resulted in complete rescue of the embryonic lethality of Adar1p150-/- mice to adulthood, contrasting with the limited or no rescue by removing MDA5, PKR or ZBP1 alone, demonstrating that this is a species conserved function of ADAR1p150. Our findings demonstrate that MDA5 and PKR are the primary in vivo effectors of fatal autoinflammation following the loss of ADAR1p150.

genetics↗

A Small Subset of Cytosolic dsRNAs Must Be Edited by ADAR1 to Evade MDA5-Mediated Autoimmunity

The innate immune system detects viral infection via pattern recognition receptors and induces defense reactions such as production of type I interferon1. One such receptor, MDA5, is activated upon the recognition of double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) that are often produced during viral replication2. Endogenous dsRNAs evade MDA5 activation through RNA editing by ADAR1, thus preventing autoimmunity3-5. Among the large number of endogenous dsRNAs, the key substrates whose editing is critical to evade MDA5 activation (termed as immunogenic dsRNAs) remain elusive. Here we reveal the identity of human immunogenic dsRNAs, a surprisingly small fraction of all cellular dsRNAs, to fill the gap in the ADAR1-dsRNA-MDA5 axis. We found that, in contrast to previous findings6,7, the immunogenic dsRNAs were highly enriched in mRNAs and depleted of introns, an expected indication of bona fide substrates of cytosolic MDA5. The immunogenic dsRNAs, in contrast to non-immunogenic dsRNAs, tended to have shorter loop between the stems, which may facilitate dsRNA formation. They also tended to be enriched at the GWAS signals of common inflammatory diseases, implying that they are truly immunogenic. We validated the MDA5-dependent immunogenicity of the dsRNAs, which was dampened following ADAR1-mediated RNA editing. We anticipate that a focused analysis of immunogenic dsRNAs will greatly facilitate the understanding and treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases in which the important roles of dsRNA editing and sensing continue to be revealed8-13.

genetics↗

Developmentally regulated alternate 3' end cleavage of nascent transcripts controls dynamic changes in protein expression in an adult stem cell lineage

Alternative polyadenylation (APA) generates transcript isoforms that differ in the position of the 3 cleavage site, resulting in the production of mRNA isoforms with different length 3UTRs. Although widespread, the role of APA in the biology of cells, tissues and organisms has been controversial. We identified over 500 Drosophila genes that express mRNA isoforms with a long 3UTR in proliferating spermatogonia but a short 3UTR in differentiating spermatocytes due to APA. We show that the stage-specific choice of the 3 end cleavage site can be regulated by the arrangement of a canonical polyadenylation signal (PAS) near the distal cleavage site but a variant or no recognizable PAS near the proximal cleavage site. The emergence of transcripts with shorter 3UTRs in differentiating cells correlated with changes in expression of the encoded proteins, either from off in spermatogonia to on in spermatocytes or vice versa. Polysome gradient fractionation revealed over 250 genes where the long 3UTR versus short 3UTR mRNA isoforms migrated differently, consistent with dramatic stage-specific changes in translation state. Thus, the developmentally regulated choice of an alternative site at which to make the 3end cut that terminates nascent transcripts can profoundly affect the suite of proteins expressed as cells advance through sequential steps in a differentiation lineage.

developmental biology↗

Learning cis-regulatory principles of ADAR-based RNA editing from CRISPR-mediated mutagenesis

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing catalyzed by ADAR enzymes occurs in double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs). How the RNA sequence and structure (i.e., the cis-regulation) determine the editing efficiency and specificity is poorly understood, despite a compelling need towards functional understanding of known editing events and transcriptome engineering of desired adenosines. We developed a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated saturation mutagenesis approach to generate comprehensive libraries of point mutations near an editing site and its editing complementary sequence (ECS) at the endogenous genomic locus. We used machine learning to integrate diverse RNA sequence features and computationally predicted structures to model editing levels measured by deep sequencing and identified cis-regulatory features of RNA editing. As proof-of-concept, we applied this integrative approach to three editing substrates. Our models explained over 70% of variation in editing levels. The models indicate that RNA sequence and structure features synergistically determine the editing levels. Our integrative approach can be broadly applied to any editing site towards the goal of deciphering the RNA editing code. It also provides guidance for designing and screening of antisense RNA sequences that form dsRNA duplex with the target transcript for ADAR-mediated transcriptome engineering.

molecular biology↗

Unbiased identification of trans regulators of ADAR and A-to-I RNA editing

Adenosine-to-Inosine RNA editing is catalyzed by ADAR enzymes that deaminate adenosine to inosine. While many RNA editing sites are known, few trans regulators have been identified. We perform BioID followed by mass-spectrometry to identify trans regulators of ADAR1 and ADAR2 in HeLa and M17 neuroblastoma cells. We identify known and novel ADAR-interacting proteins. Using ENCODE data we validate and characterize a subset of the novel interactors as global or site-specific RNA editing regulators. Our set of novel trans regulators includes all four members of the DZF-domain-containing family of proteins: ILF3, ILF2, STRBP, and ZFR. We show that these proteins interact with each ADAR and modulate RNA editing levels. We find ILF3 is a global negative regulator of editing. This work demonstrates the broad roles RNA binding proteins play in regulating editing levels and establishes DZF-domain containing proteins as a group of highly influential RNA editing regulators.

genetics↗

Zinc finger RNA binding protein Zn72D regulates ADAR-mediated RNA editing in neurons

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing, catalyzed by ADAR enzymes, alters RNA sequences from those encoded by DNA. These editing events are dynamically regulated, but few trans regulators of ADARs are known in vivo. Here, we screen RNA binding proteins for roles in editing regulation using in vivo knockdown experiments in the Drosophila brain. We identify Zinc-Finger Protein at 72D (Zn72D) as a regulator of editing levels at a majority of editing sites in the brain. Zn72D both regulates ADAR protein levels and interacts with ADAR in an RNA-dependent fashion, and similar to ADAR, Zn72D is necessary to maintain proper neuromuscular junction architecture and motility in the fly. Furthermore, the mammalian homolog of Zn72D, Zfr, regulates editing in mouse primary neurons, demonstrating the conservation of this regulatory role. The broad and conserved regulation of ADAR editing by Zn72D in neurons represents a novel mechanism by which critically important editing events are sustained.

genetics↗

Dynamic landscape and genetic regulation of RNA editing in schizophrenia

RNA editing is vital for neurodevelopment and the maintenance of normal neuronal function. We surveyed the global landscape and genetic regulation of RNA editing across several hundred schizophrenia and control postmortem brain samples from the CommonMind Consortium covering two regions, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex. In schizophrenia, RNA editing sites encoding AMPA glutamate receptors and post-synaptic density genes were less edited, while more editing was detected in sites implicated in translational initiation. These sites replicate between brain regions, map to 3UTRs, enrich for common sequence motifs and coincide for RNA binding proteins crucial for neurodevelopment. Importantly, these findings cross-validate in hundreds of non-overlapping DLPFC samples. Furthermore, ~30% of RNA editing sites associate with cis-regulatory variants (edQTLs). Fine-mapping edQTLs with schizophrenia GWAS loci revealed colocalization of 11 edQTLs with 6 GWAS loci. This supports a causal role of RNA editing in risk for schizophrenia. Our findings illustrate widespread altered RNA editing in schizophrenia and its genetic regulation, and shed light onto RNA editing-mediated mechanisms in schizophrenia neuropathology.

neuroscience↗

Illuminating spatial A-to-I RNA editing signatures within the Drosophila brain

SummaryAdenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, catalyzed by ADAR enzymes, is a ubiquitous mechanism that generates transcriptomic diversity. This process is particularly important for proper neuronal function; however, little is known about how RNA editing is dynamically regulated between the many functionally distinct neuronal populations of the brain. In this resource paper, we present a spatial RNA editing map in the Drosophila brain and show that different neuronal populations possess distinct RNA editing signatures. After purifying and sequencing RNA from genetically marked neuronal nuclei, we identified a large number of novel editing sites and compared editing levels in hundreds of transcripts across nine functionally different neuronal populations. We found distinct editing repertoires for each population, including novel sites in repeat regions of the transcriptome and differential editing in highly conserved and likely functional regions of transcripts that encode essential neuronal genes. These changes are site-specific and not driven by changes in Adar expression, suggesting a complex, targeted regulation of editing levels in key transcripts. This fine-tuning of the transcriptome between different neurons by RNA editing may account for functional differences between distinct populations in the brain.\n\nSignificance StatementA fundamental question in contemporary neuroscience is how the remarkable cellular diversity required for the intricate function of the nervous system is achieved. In this manuscript, we bridge the gap between a cellular machinery that is known to diversify the transcriptome and the existence of distinct neuronal populations that compose Drosophila brain. Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA-editing is a ubiquitous mechanism that generates transcriptomic diversity in cells by recoding certain adenosines within the pre-mRNA sequence into inosines. We present a spatial map of RNA editing across different neuronal populations in Drosophila brain. Each neuronal population has a distinct editing signature, with the majority of differential editing occurring in highly conserved regions of transcripts that encode ion channels and other essential neuronal genes.

neuroscience↗

A conserved nuclear export complex coordinates transcripts for dopaminergic synaptogenesis and neuronal surviva

Synaptic vesicle and active zone proteins are required for synaptogenesis. The molecular mechanisms for coordinated synthesis of these proteins are not understood. Using forward genetic screens, we identified the conserved THO nuclear export Complex (THOC) as master regulator of presynapse development in C.elegans dopaminergic neurons. In THOC mutants, synaptic messenger RNAs are trapped in the nucleus, resulting in dramatic decrease of synaptic protein expression, near complete loss of synapses and compromised dopamine function. cAMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB) interacts with THOC to mark activity-dependent transcripts for efficient nuclear export. Deletion of the THOC subunit Thoc5 in mouse dopaminergic neurons causes severe defects in synapse maintenance and subsequent neuronal death in the Substantia Nigra compacta (SNc). These cellular defects lead to abrogated dopamine release, ataxia and animal death. Together, our results argue that nuclear export mechanisms can select specific mRNAs and be a rate-limiting step for synapse development and neuronal survival.\n\nHighlightsO_LIDopaminergic presynapses are severely impaired in thoc mutant worms and mice\nC_LIO_LITHOC specifically controls the nuclear export of synaptic transcripts\nC_LIO_LICREB recruits THOC onto activity-dependent synaptic transcripts for efficient export\nC_LIO_LIDopamine neurons in the SNc degenerate upon conditional knock-out of thoc5\nC_LI

neuroscience↗