bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Levine, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Levine, S..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Origin-1: a generative AI platform for de novo antibody design against novel epitopes

0Generative artificial intelligence has advanced antibody discovery, yet de novo design of therapeutic antibodies against targets with "zero-prior" epitopes remains a fundamental challenge. We define "zero-prior" epitopes as target sites lacking structural data from any reported antibody-antigen or protein-protein complex involving the target. Here we present Origin-1, a generative AI platform that overcomes this by integrating epitope-conditioned all-atom structure generation, paired complementarity determining region sequence design, and a specialized co-folding-based scoring protocol to select antibody designs predicted to be high-confidence, specific binders with favorable developability. We evaluated Origin-1 on a panel of ten targets selected to have no available protein-protein complex structures and minimal homology ([≤]60% sequence identity) to proteins with known complexes, creating stringent design conditions. In fewer than one hundred design attempts per target, we identified developable, specific antibodies, validated across multiple biophysical and developability assays, for four targets: COL6A3, AZGP1, CHI3L2, and IL36RA, with functional inhibition demonstrated for IL36RA. Cryogenic electron microscopy confirmed the atomic accuracy of our designs, revealing complexes that closely matched the computational models with high structural fidelity (3.0-3.3 [A] resolution; 0.83-0.91 DockQ). Furthermore, we employed AI-guided affinity maturation to optimize a de novo antibody binder against IL36RA, producing functional antagonists with sub-nanomolar affinities and a top EC50 of 12.3 nM. These results demonstrate a framework for targeting epitopes without structural precedent, expanding the programmable therapeutic antibody landscape.

molecular biology↗

Designing Cell-Type-Specific Promoter Sequences Using Conservative Model-Based Optimization

Gene therapies have the potential to treat disease by delivering therapeutic genetic cargo to disease-associated cells. One limitation to their widespread use is the lack of short regulatory sequences, or promoters, that differentially induce the expression of delivered genetic cargo in target cells, minimizing side effects in other cell types. Such cell-type-specific promoters are difficult to discover using existing methods, requiring either manual curation or access to large datasets of promoter-driven expression from both targeted and untargeted cells. Model-based optimization (MBO) has emerged as an effective method to design biological sequences in an automated manner, and has recently been used in promoter design methods. However, these methods have only been tested using large training datasets that are expensive to collect, and focus on designing promoters for markedly different cell types, overlooking the complexities associated with designing promoters for closely related cell types that share similar regulatory features. Therefore, we introduce a comprehensive framework for utilizing MBO to design promoters in a data-efficient manner, with an emphasis on discovering promoters for similar cell types. We use conservative objective models (COMs) for MBO and highlight practical considerations such as best practices for improving sequence diversity, getting estimates of model uncertainty, and choosing the optimal set of sequences for experimental validation. Using three relatively similar blood cancer cell lines (Jurkat, K562, and THP1), we show that our approach discovers many novel cell-type-specific promoters after experimentally validating the designed sequences. For K562 cells, in particular, we discover a promoter that has 75.85% higher cell-type-specificity than the best promoter from the initial dataset used to train our models.

synthetic biology↗

In vitro validated antibody design against multiple therapeutic antigens using generative inverse folding

Deep learning approaches have demonstrated the ability to design protein sequences given backbone structures [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. While these approaches have been applied in silico to designing antibody complementarity-determining regions (CDRs), they have yet to be validated in vitro for designing antibody binders, which is the true measure of success for antibody design. Here we describe IgDesign, a deep learning method for antibody CDR design, and demonstrate its robustness with successful binder design for 8 therapeutic antigens. The model is tasked with designing heavy chain CDR3 (HCDR3) or all three heavy chain CDRs (HCDR123) using native backbone structures of antibody-antigen complexes, along with the antigen and antibody framework (FWR) sequences as context. For each of the 8 antigens, we design 100 HCDR3s and 100 HCDR123s, scaffold them into the native antibodys variable region, and screen them for binding against the antigen using surface plasmon resonance (SPR). As a baseline, we screen 100 HCDR3s taken from the models training set and paired with the native HCDR1 and HCDR2. We observe that both HCDR3 design and HCDR123 design outperform this HCDR3-only baseline. IgDesign is the first experimentally validated antibody inverse folding model. It can design antibody binders to multiple therapeutic antigens with high success rates and, in some cases, improved affinities over clinically validated reference antibodies. Antibody inverse folding has applications to both de novo antibody design and lead optimization, making IgDesign a valuable tool for accelerating drug development and enabling therapeutic design. The data generated in this study serve as a useful benchmark of diverse antibody-antigen interactions. We use this data to benchmark self-consistency RMSD (scRMSD), using ABodyBuilder2 [6], ABodyBuilder3 [7], and ESMFold [8], as a metric for assessing binding. We open source the code for IgDesign and the SPR datasets. Code and datasets can be found at https://github.com/AbSciBio/igdesign.

synthetic biology↗

Pretraining strategies for effective promoter-driven gene expression prediction

The ability to deliver genetic cargo to human cells is enabling rapid progress in molecular medicine, but designing this cargo for precise expression in specific cell types is a major challenge. Expression is driven by regulatory DNA sequences within short synthetic promoters, but relatively few of these promoters are cell-type-specific. The ability to design cell-type-specific promoters using model-based optimization would be impactful for research and therapeutic applications. However, models of expression from short synthetic promoters (promoter-driven expression) are lacking for most cell types due to insufficient training data in those cell types. Although there are many large datasets of both endogenous expression and promoter-driven expression in other cell types, which provide information that could be used for transfer learning, transfer strategies remain largely unexplored for predicting promoter-driven expression. Here, we propose a variety of pretraining tasks, transfer strategies, and model architectures for modelling promoter-driven expression. To thoroughly evaluate various methods, we propose two benchmarks that reflect data-constrained and large dataset settings. In the data-constrained setting, we find that pretraining followed by transfer learning is highly effective, improving performance by 24 - 27%. In the large dataset setting, transfer learning leads to more modest gains, improving performance by up to 2%. We also propose the best architecture to model promoter-driven expression when training from scratch. The methods we identify are broadly applicable for modelling promoter-driven expression in understudied cell types, and our findings will guide the choice of models that are best suited to designing promoters for gene delivery applications using model-based optimization. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/anikethjr/promoter_models.

genomics↗

Enhancer Reprogramming in Melanoma Immune Checkpoint Therapy Resistance

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has improved long-term survival for patients with advanced melanoma. However, there is critical need to identify potential biomarkers of response and actionable strategies to improve response rates. Through generation and analysis of 148 chromatin modification maps for 36 melanoma samples from patients treated with anti-PD- 1, we identified significant enrichment of active enhancer states in non-responders at baseline. Analysis of an independent cohort of 20 samples identified a set of 437 enhancers that predicted response to anti-PD-1 therapy (Area Under the Curve of 0.8417). The activated non-responder enhancers marked a group of key regulators of several pathways in melanoma cells (including c- MET, TGF{beta}, EMT and AKT) that are known to mediate resistance to ICB therapy and several checkpoint receptors in T cells. Epigenetic editing experiments implicated involvement of c-MET enhancers in the modulation of immune response. Finally, inhibition of enhancers and repression of these pathways using bromodomain inhibitors along with anti-PD-1 therapy significantly decreased melanoma tumor burden and increased T-cell infiltration. Together, these findings identify a potential enhancer-based biomarker of resistance to anti-PD-1 and suggest enhancer blockade in combination with ICB as a potential strategy to improve responses.

cancer biology↗

Antibody optimization enabled by artificial intelligence predictions of binding affinity and naturalness

Traditional antibody optimization approaches involve screening a small subset of the available sequence space, often resulting in drug candidates with suboptimal binding affinity, developability or immunogenicity. Based on two distinct antibodies, we demonstrate that deep contextual language models trained on high-throughput affinity data can quantitatively predict binding of unseen antibody sequence variants. These variants span a KD range of three orders of magnitude over a large mutational space. Our models reveal strong epistatic effects, which highlight the need for intelligent screening approaches. In addition, we introduce the modeling of "naturalness", a metric that scores antibody variants for similarity to natural immunoglobulins. We show that naturalness is associated with measures of drug developability and immunogenicity, and that it can be optimized alongside binding affinity using a genetic algorithm. This approach promises to accelerate and improve antibody engineering, and may increase the success rate in developing novel antibody and related drug candidates.

bioinformatics↗

Deep reinforcement learning for modeling human locomotion control in neuromechanical simulation

Modeling human motor control and predicting how humans will move in novel environments is a grand scientific challenge. Despite advances in neuroscience techniques, it is still difficult to measure and interpret the activity of the millions of neurons involved in motor control. Thus, researchers in the fields of biomechanics and motor control have proposed and evaluated motor control models via neuromechanical simulations, which produce physically correct motions of a musculoskeletal model. Typically, researchers have developed control models that encode physiologically plausible motor control hypotheses and compared the resulting simulation behaviors to measurable human motion data. While such plausible control models were able to simulate and explain many basic locomotion behaviors (e.g. walking, running, and climbing stairs), modeling higher layer controls (e.g. processing environment cues, planning long-term motion strategies, and coordinating basic motor skills to navigate in dynamic and complex environments) remains a challenge. Recent advances in deep reinforcement learning lay a foundation for modeling these complex control processes and controlling a diverse repertoire of human movement; however, reinforcement learning has been rarely applied in neuromechanical simulation to model human control. In this paper, we review the current state of neuromechanical simulations, along with the fundamentals of reinforcement learning, as it applies to human locomotion. We also present a scientific competition and accompanying software platform, which we have organized to accelerate the use of reinforcement learning in neuromechanical simulations. This "Learn to Move" competition, which we have run annually since 2017 at the NeurIPS conference, has attracted over 1300 teams from around the world. Top teams adapted state-of-art deep reinforcement learning techniques to produce complex motions, such as quick turning and walk-to-stand transitions, that have not been demonstrated before in neuromechanical simulations without utilizing reference motion data. We close with a discussion of future opportunities at the intersection of human movement simulation and reinforcement learning and our plans to extend the Learn to Move competition to further facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration in modeling human motor control for biomechanics and rehabilitation research.

bioengineering↗