bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Lenz, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Lenz, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Chondrocyte-Specific Knockout of Piezo1 and Piezo2 Protects Against Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis Structural Damage and Pain in Mice

AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSOsteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating joint disease characterized by cartilage degeneration, synovial inflammation, and bone remodeling, with limited therapeutic options targeting the underlying pathophysiology. Mechanosensitive ion channels Piezo1 and Piezo2 play crucial roles in chondrocyte responses to mechanical stress, mediating mechanotransduction pathways that influence chondrocyte survival, matrix production, and inflammatory signaling, but their distinct contributions to OA pathogenesis remain unclear. MethodsUsing inducible, chondrocyte-specific Aggrecan-Cre (Acan) mice, we investigated Piezo1, Piezo2, and combined Piezo1/2 conditional knockouts (cKOs) using the destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) model of post-traumatic OA in male and female mice. Pain and behavioral assessments were conducted at four time points to evaluate OA progression, while cartilage damage, bone remodeling, and synovial inflammation were assessed at the final endpoint of 28 weeks. Statistical analyses included one-way and two-way ANOVA with Tukeys multiple comparisons test. ResultsPiezo1 cKO delayed pain onset but ultimately exacerbated cartilage degradation and synovitis, emphasizing its dual role in protective and pathogenic mechanotransduction. While the Piezo2 cKO reduced pain and preserved activity, it failed to protect cartilage. Notably, Piezo1/2 cKO provided the greatest protection against cartilage degeneration, synovitis, and pain. Micro-computed tomography analyses revealed that Piezo2 is critical for maintaining trabecular bone integrity, with a Piezo2 cKO leading to decreased bone volume, thickness, and density, independent of injury. Piezo2 cKO also reduced normal meniscal ossification that occurs with age in mice. In contrast, a Piezo1/2 cKO normalized most bone remodeling parameters observed in Piezo2 cKO mice but did not restore medial tibial plateau thickness, highlighting Piezo2s essential role in bone structure. ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate the overlapping and compensatory roles of Piezo1 and Piezo2 in OA pathogenesis. Dual inhibition of Piezo1 and Piezo2 may offer a novel, effective therapeutic strategy targeting both structural and symptomatic aspects of the disease.

physiology↗

PrP turnover in vivo and the time to effect of prion disease therapeutics

PrP lowering is effective against prion disease in animal models and is being tested clinically. Therapies in the current pipeline lower PrP production, leaving pre-existing PrP to be cleared according to its own half-life. We hypothesized that PrPs half-life may be a rate-limiting factor for the time to effect of PrP-lowering drugs, and one reason why late treatment of prion-infected mice is not as effective as early treatment. Using isotopically labeled diet with targeted mass spectrometry, as well as antisense oligonucleotide treatment followed by timed PrP measurement, we estimate a half-life of 5-6 days for PrP in the brain. PrP turnover is not affected by over-or under-expression. Mouse PrP and human PrP have similar turnover rates measured in wild-type or humanized knock-in mice. CSF PrP appears to mirror brain PrP in real time in rats. PrP in the colon is readily quantifiable and has a half-life just slightly shorter than in brain. An under-expressed pathogenic mutant PrP, corresponding to D178N in humans, exhibits an accelerated turnover rate. Our data may inform the design of both preclinical and clinical studies of PrP-lowering drugs. Author SummaryPrion disease is a fatal brain disease caused by misfolding of the prion protein (PrP). Emerging therapies for prion disease seek to reduce the amount of PrP produced in the brain in order to delay onset of disease or slow progression. Mouse studies have shown that if these therapies are initiated too late, their benefit is limited or they may not help at all. Here we measure the half-life of PrP in the mouse brain, and find that it is about 5 days. When drugs are used to lower PrP by cutting up the RNA that encodes PrP, the RNA drops rapidly while the protein lags behind, and does not reach its minimum level until 4 weeks after the drug is dosed. This half-life is about the same regardless of the species of PrP (mouse or human) and whether or not the brain is infected with prions. Cerebrospinal fluid appears to reflect the real-time levels of brain PrP with no appreciable lag. PrP can be measured in colon, which may be useful in animal studies of systemic drugs to lower PrP. PrP turns over more quickly in the presence of a pathogenic genetic variant, the equivalent of the human D178N variant. These findings suggest that clinical trials can monitor PrP in cerebrospinal fluid to look at drug activity, but should plan timepoints far enough post-dose to account for PrPs rate of turnover, and should focus on patients who will survive long enough to benefit from the drug.

neuroscience↗