Lee-Yaw, J. A. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2023

Latitudinal gradients in predation persist in urban environments

Urbanization can profoundly disrupt local ecology. But while urban areas now stretch across latitudes, little is known about urbanizations effects on macroecological patterns. We used standardized experiments to test whether urbanization disrupts latitudinal gradients in seed predation, a macroecological pattern that shapes community assembly and diversity. Using >56,000 seeds, we compared predation in urbanized and natural areas across 14,000 km of latitude, spanning the Americas. Predation increased 5-fold from high latitudes to the tropics, and latitudinal gradients in predation persisted in urban areas despite significant habitat modification. Urbanization reduced predation by vertebrates, but not invertebrates, and seemed to increase ant predation specifically. Our results show that macroecological patterns in predation intensity can persist in urbanized environments, even as urbanization alters the relative importance of predators. One-Sentence SummaryAcross 56,000 seeds and 112{degrees} of latitude, latitudinal gradients in seed predation are equally strong in natural vs. urban areas

ecology↗

bioRxiv2020

Expansion dynamics and marginal climates drive adaptation across geographic ranges

Every species experiences limits to its geographic distribution. Some evolutionary models predict that populations at range edges are less well-adapted to their local environments due to drift, expansion load, or swamping gene flow from the range interior. Alternatively, populations near range edges might be uniquely adapted to marginal environments. In this study, we use a database of transplant studies that quantify performance at broad geographic scales to test how local adaptation, site quality, and population quality change from spatial and climatic range centers towards edges. We find that populations from poleward edges perform relatively poorly, both on average across all sites (15% lower population quality) and when compared to other populations at home (31% relative fitness disadvantage), consistent with these populations harboring high genetic load. Populations from equatorial edges also perform poorly on average (18% lower population quality) but, in contrast, outperform foreign populations (16% relative fitness advantage), suggesting that populations from equatorial edges have strongly adapted to unique environments. Finally, we find that populations from sites that are thermally extreme relative to the species niche demonstrate strong local adaptation, regardless of their geographic position. Our findings indicate that both nonadaptive processes and adaptive evolution contribute to variation in adaptation across species ranges.

evolutionary biology↗