bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ledru, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Ledru, L..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Is adaptive foraging adaptive? A resource-consumer eco-evolutionary model.

Phenotypic plasticity has important ecological and evolutionary consequences. In particular, behavioural phenotypic plasticity such as adaptive foraging (AF) by consumers, may enhance community stability. Yet little is known about the ecological conditions that favor the evolution of AF, and how the evolutionary dynamics of AF may modulate its effects on community stability. In order to address these questions, we constructed an eco-evolutionary model in which resource and consumer niche traits underwent evolutionary diversification. Consumers could either forage randomly, only as a function of resources abundance, or adaptatively, as a function of resource abundance, suitability and consumption by competitors. AF evolved when the niche breadth of consumers with respect to resource use was large enough and when the ecological conditions allowed substantial functional diversification. In turn, AF promoted further diversification of the niche traits in both guilds. This suggests that phenotypic plasticity can influence the evolutionary dynamics at the community-level. Faced with a sudden environmental change, AF promoted community stability directly and also indirectly through its effects on functional diversity. However, other disturbances such as persistent environmental change and increases in mortality, caused the evolutionary regression of the AF behaviour, due to its costs. The causal relationships between AF, community stability and diversity are therefore intricate, and their outcome depends on the nature of the environmental disturbance, in contrast to simpler models claiming a direct positive relationship between AF and stability.

ecology↗

Mutualists construct the ecological conditions that trigger the transition from parasitism

The evolution of mutualism between hosts and initially parasitic symbionts represents a major transition in evolution. Although vertical transmission of symbionts during host reproduction and partner control both favour the stability of mutualism, these mechanisms require specifically evolved features that may be absent in the first place. Therefore, the first steps of the transition from parasitism to mutualism may suffer from the cost of mutualism at the organismic level. We hypothesize that spatial structure can lead to the formation of higher selection levels favouring mutualism. This resembles the evolution of altruism, with the additional requirement that the offspring of mutualistic hosts and symbionts must co-occur often enough. Using a spatially explicit agent-based model we demonstrate that, starting from a parasitic system with global dispersal, the joint evolution of mutualistic effort and local dispersal of hosts and symbionts leads to a stable coexistence between parasites and mutualists. The evolution of local dispersal mimics vertical transmission and triggers the formation of mutualistic clusters, counteracting the organismic selection level of parasites that maintain global dispersal. The transition occurs when mutualistic symbionts increase the density of hosts, which strengthens competition between hosts and disfavours hosts inhabiting areas dominated by parasitic symbionts: mutualists construct the ecological conditions that allow their own spread. Therefore, the transition to mutualism may come from an eco-evolutionary feedback loop involving spatially structured population dynamics.

evolutionary biology↗

Spatial structure of natural boxwood and the invasive box tree moth can promote coexistence

In the absence of top-down and bottom-up controls, herbivores eventually drive themselves to extinction by ex-hausting their host plants. Poorly mobile herbivores may experiment only local disappearance, because they can recolonize intact plant patches elsewhere, leaving time to previously over-exploited patches to regrow. However most herbivores such as winged insects are highly mobile, which may prevent the formation of spatial heterogeneity. We test if long-distance dispersal can preclude coexistence using the invasion of box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis) in Europe as a model system. We build a lattice model and estimate the parameters with a combination of field measurements, experimental data and literature sources. Space corresponds either to a realistic boxwood landscape in the Alps, or to theoretical landscapes of various sizes. We find that both species persist under a large range of realistic parameter values, despite a severe reduction in boxwood biomass, with an alternation of outbreaks and near-to-extinction moth densities. Large landscapes are necessary for coexistence, allowing the formation of spatial structure. Slow plant regrowth combined with long-distance dispersal could drive moths to extinction, because of resources depletion at the global scale even without a complete synchronization of the local dynamics. The spatial dynamics leads to formation of small plant patches evenly distributed in the landscape, because of a combination of local plant dispersal and global indirect competition between plants through their positive effect on moth population size. Coexistence is favored by such heterogeneous landscapes, because empty patches increase moth mortality during dispersal: the system thus creates its own stability conditions.

ecology↗