Biology subjects

Lavi, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Lavi, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

The Effect of Arm Restriction on Dynamic Stability and Upper Body Responses to Lateral Loss of Balance During Walking: An Observational Study

When losing balance, upper-body movements serve as mechanical aids to regain stability. However, it remains unclear how these movements contribute to dynamic stability during recovery from a lateral loss of balance while walking with arm restriction. We aimed to 1) quantify the effect of arm restriction on gait stability and upper-body velocities, and 2) characterize upper-body kinematic strategies in response to lateral surface translations under different arm restriction conditions. Healthy adults were exposed to lateral surface translations while walking on a computerized treadmill under three conditions: free arms, 1-arm restricted and, 2-arms restricted. Dynamic stability and upper-body velocities for the first step after perturbation onset were extracted. We found decreased dynamic stability in the sagittal plane and increased trunk velocity in the 2-arm restricted condition compared to the free arms condition. Head and trunk movements in the mediolateral plane were in opposite directions in 44.31% of responses. Additionally, significant trunk velocities were observed in the opposite direction to the perturbation-induced loss of balance. Our results support the contribution of increased upper-body velocities to balance responses following arm-restricted walking perturbations and suggest that the 2-arm restricted condition may be utilized as a perturbation-based balance training, focusing on head and trunk responses.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Co-allocation to overlapping dendritic branches in the retrosplenial cortex integrates contextual memories across time

Events occurring close in time are often linked in memory, providing an episodic timeline and a framework for those memories. Recent studies suggest that memories acquired close in time are encoded by overlapping neuronal ensembles, but the role of dendritic plasticity mechanisms in linking memories is unknown. Using activity-dependent labeling and manipulation approaches, longitudinal one- and two-photon imaging of somatic and dendritic compartments, and computational modeling, we show that memory linking is not only dependent on ensemble overlap in the retrosplenial cortex, but also on branch-specific dendritic allocation mechanisms. The same dendritic segments are preferentially activated by two linked memories, and spine clusters added after each of the two linked memories are allocated to the same dendritic segments. Our results demonstrate a causal mechanistic role for dendritic plasticity in memory integration and reveal a novel set of rules that govern how linked and independent memories are allocated to dendritic compartments.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

A retrograde mechanism coordinates memory allocation across brain regions

Memories engage ensembles of neurons across different brain regions within a memory system. However, it is unclear whether the allocation of a memory to these ensembles is coordinated across brain regions. To address this question, we used CREB expression to bias memory allocation in one brain region, and rabies retrograde tracing to test memory allocation in connected presynaptic neurons in the other brain regions. We find that biasing allocation of CTA memory in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) also biases memory allocation in presynaptic neurons of the insular cortex (IC). By manipulating the allocation of CTA memory to specific neurons in both BLA and IC, we found that we increased their connectivity and enhanced CTA memory performance. These results - which are corroborated by mathematical simulations, and by studies with auditory fear conditioning - demonstrate that a retrograde mechanism coordinates the allocation of memories across different brain regions.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

CCR5 closes the temporal window for memory linking

Real world memories are formed in a particular context and are not acquired or recalled in isolation 1-5. Time is a key variable in the organization of memories, since events experienced close in time are more likely to be meaningfully associated, while those experienced with a longer interval are not1-4. How does the brain segregate events that are temporally distinct? Here, we report that a delayed (12-24h) increase in the expression of the C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5), an immune receptor well known as a co-receptor for HIV infection6,7, following the formation of a contextual memory, determines the duration of the temporal window for associating or linking that memory with subsequent memories. This delayed CCR5 expression in mouse dorsal CA1 (dCA1) neurons results in a decrease in neuronal excitability, which in turn negatively regulates neuronal memory allocation, thus reducing the overlap between dCA1 memory ensembles. Lowering this overlap affects the ability of one memory to trigger the recall of the other, thus closing the temporal window for memory linking. Remarkably, our findings also show that an age-related increase in CCL5/CCR5 expression leads to impairments in memory linking in aged mice, which could be reversed with a CCR5 knockout and an FDA approved drug that inhibits this receptor, a result with significant clinical implications. All together the findings reported here provide the first insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms that shape the temporal window for memory linking.

neuroscience↗