bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Laupert, V.

Publications and source records attributed to Laupert, V..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Enhancer adoption by an LTR retrotransposongenerates viral-like particles causingdevelopmental limb phenotypes

Mammalian genomes are scattered with transposable elements (TEs). TEs are epigenetically silenced to prevent harmful effects caused by either global activation leading to genome instability or insertional mutation disturbing gene transcription. However, whether the activation of a single element can contribute to pathological phenotypes without directly affecting gene expression is largely unknown. Here, we show that tissue-specific expression of a TE in the embryo leads to the production of viral-like particles (VLPs) which can affect organ formation. Failure to silence an LTR retrotransposon inserted upstream of the Fgf8 gene results in its co-expression with Fgf8 in the developing embryo. While local gene regulation is unaffected, the LTR retrotransposon participates in chromatin folding at the locus and adopts the expression of the regulatory domain it is located in. This drives the production of VLPs in the Fgf8-expressing cells of the developing limb, triggering apoptotic cell death at the time of digit outgrowth and resulting in a limb malformation resembling human ectrodactyly. This phenotype can be rescued by knock-out or knock-in of the retrotransposon causing mutations preventing its full retroviral cycle. Insertion of the same element at other developmental loci faithfully recapitulates expression according to the neighboring regulatory activity. Our findings provide a mechanism by which TE insertion is incorporated into the local genomic regulatory landscape and show how VLP production in post-implantation embryos can interfere with organ formation.

developmental biology↗

CENTRE: A gradient boosting algorithm for Cell-type-specific ENhancer-Target pREdiction

MotivationIdentifying target promoters of active enhancers is a crucial step for realizing gene regulation and deciphering phenotypes and diseases. Up to now, several computational methods were developed to predict enhancer gene interactions but they require either many epigenomic and transcriptomic experimental assays to generate cell-type-specific predictions or a single experiment applied to a large cohort of cell types to extract correlations between activities of regulatory elements. Thus, inferring cell-type-specific enhancer gene interactions in unstudied or poorly annotated cell types becomes a laborious and costly task. ResultsHere, we aim to infer cell-type-specific enhancer target interactions, using minimal experimental input. We introduce CENTRE, a machine learning framework that predicts enhancer target interactions in a cell-type-specific manner, using only gene expression and ChIP-seq data for three histone modifications for the cell type of interest. CENTRE exploits the wealth of available datasets and extracts cell-type agnostic statistics to complement the cell-type specific information. CENTRE is thoroughly tested across many datasets and cell types and achieves equivalent or superior performance than existing algorithms that require massive experimental data. AvailabilityCENTREs open source code is available at GitHub via https://github.com/slrvv/CENTRE

bioinformatics↗

Promoter repression and 3D-restructuring resolves divergent developmental gene expression in TADs

Cohesin loop extrusion facilitates precise gene expression by continuously driving promoters to sample all enhancers located within the same topologically-associated domain (TAD). However, many TADs contain multiple genes with divergent expression patterns, thereby indicating additional forces further refine how enhancer activities are utilised. Here, we unravel the mechanisms enabling a new gene, Rex1, to emerge with divergent expression within the ancient Fat1 TAD in placental mammals. We show that such divergent expression is not determined by a strict enhancer-promoter compatibility code, intra-TAD position or nuclear envelope-attachment. Instead, TAD-restructuring in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) separates Rex1 and Fat1 with distinct proximal enhancers that independently drive their expression. By contrast, in later embryonic tissues, DNA methylation renders the inactive Rex1 promoter profoundly unresponsive to Fat1 enhancers within the intact TAD. Combined, these features adapted an ancient regulatory landscape during evolution to support two entirely independent Rex1 and Fat1 expression programs. Thus, rather than operating only as rigid blocks of co-regulated genes, TAD-regulatory landscapes can orchestrate complex divergent expression patterns in evolution. HIGHLIGHTSO_LINew genes can emerge in evolution without taking on the expression pattern of their surrounding pre-existing TAD. C_LIO_LICompartmentalisation can restructure seemingly evolutionarily stable TADs to control a promoters access to enhancers. C_LIO_LILamina-associated domains neither prevent transcriptional activation nor enhancer-promoter communication. C_LIO_LIRepression rather than promoter-specificity refines when genes respond to promiscuous enhancer activities in specific tissues. C_LI

genetics↗