bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Latil, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Latil, G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Fungal infection alters collective nutritional intake of ant colonies

In many animals, parasitic infections impose significant fitness costs [1-6]. Animals are known to alter their feeding behavior when infected to help combat various parasites [7-12]. For instance, they can adjust nutrient intake to support their immune system [13,14]. However, parasites can also manipulate host foraging behavior to increase their own development, survival and transmission [15-18]. The mechanisms by which nutrition influences host-parasite interactions are still not well understood. Until now, studies that examine the impact of diet on infection have mainly focused on the host, and less on the parasite [12,13, 19-25]. Using Nutritional Geometry [26], we investigated the role of key nutrients: amino acids and carbohydrates, in a host-parasite system: the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium brunneum. We first established that the fungus grew and reproduced better on diets comprising four times less amino acids than carbohydrates (1:4 AA:C ratio). Second, when facing food combinations, the fungus exploited the two complementary food resources to reach the same performance as on this optimal diet, revealing the ability of fungal pathogens to solve complex nutritional challenges. Third, when ants were fed on this optimal fungal diet, their lifespan decreased when healthy, yet not when Metarhizium-infected, compared to their favored carbohydrate-rich diet. Interestingly, when the ants were given a binary choice between different diets, the foragers of uninfected colonies avoided intake of the fungal optimum diet, whilst choosing it when infected. Experimental disentanglement of full pathogenic infection and pure immune response to fungal cell wall material, combined with immune measurements, allowed us to conclude that this change of nutritional choice in infected ants did not result from pathogen manipulation but likely represents a compensation of the host to counterbalance the cost of using amino acids during the immune response. The observed change in foraging behavior in infected colonies towards an otherwise harmful diet (self-medication), suggests a collective compensatory mechanism for the individual cost of immunity. In short, we demonstrated that infected ants converge on a diet that is proven to be costly for survival in the long term but that could help them fight infection in the short term. HighlightsO_LIThe insect-pathogenic fungus Metarhizium brunneum performs best on protein-rich diets and is able to solve complex nutritional challenges C_LIO_LIWhile harmful to healthy ants, protein-rich diets did not shorten infected ants lifespan C_LIO_LIContrary to healthy ants, when given a choice, infected and immune-stimulated ants choose a protein-rich diet C_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗

Clearing the way to the external world: do ants make optimal decisions when removing obstacles from their subterranean galleries?

Transport tasks are simple tasks whose cost can be easily measured and that are thus well suited to test optimality hypotheses. Here we focus on a particular type of transport that occur when ants are clearing obstacles from their subterranean galleries. In the laboratory we studied how they extract an object from a gallery of various inclinations. We expected that if ants behave optimally, they should remove the object by the gallery extremity requiring the lower energetic effort. At the colony-level, we found that the obstacle was more often extracted by the lower end of the tube, even if this required a higher amount of mechanical work. At the individual level however, ants showed mechanically optimal pulling behaviours in 75% of cases. Our results suggest that individual ants take into account both the inclination of the gallery and the position of the obstacle in it to decide in which direction they pull. In addition, they seem to base their decision to release the obstacle on the relative effort they perceive while pulling. Using a simple simulation model, we argue that the suboptimal extraction bias observed at the colony-level can be explained by the sequential nature of the extraction task.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Walking kinematics in the polymorphic seed harvester ant Messor barbarus: influence of ant size and load carriage

Ants are famous in the animal kingdom for their amazing load carriage performances. Yet, the mechanisms that allow these insects to maintain their stability when carrying heavy loads have been poorly investigated. Here we present a study of the kinematics of loaded locomotion in the polymorphic seed-harvesting ant Messor barbarus. In this species big ants have larger heads relative to their size than small ants. Hence, their center of mass is shifted forward, and the more so when they are carrying a load in their mandibles. We tested the hypothesis that this could lead to big ants being less statically stable than small ants, thus explaining their lower load carriage performances. When walking unloaded we found that big ants were indeed less statically stable than small ants but that they were nonetheless able to adjust their stepping pattern to partly compensate for this instability. When ants were walking loaded on the other hand, there was no evidence of different locomotor behaviors in individuals of different sizes. Loaded ants, whatever their size, move too slowly to maintain their balance through dynamic stability. Rather, they seem to do so by clinging to the ground with their hind legs during part of a stride. We show through a straightforward model that allometric relationships have a minor role in explaining the differences in load carriage performances between big ants and small ants and that a simple scale effect is sufficient to explain these differences.

animal behavior and cognition↗