Biology subjects

Larsson, M. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Larsson, M. C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Diet breadth in two polyphagous Spodoptera moths in a wide range of host and non-host plants and the potential for range expansion

O_LISeveral polyphagous moths are severe crop pests. Diet breadth patterns and mechanisms among polyphagous insects provide an excellent system to study ecological and evolutionary processes in herbivores, driving dietary specialization. However, studies of diet breadth on more than a handful of crops are scarce. C_LIO_LIHere, we estimated the diet breadth in two species of lepidopteran herbivores from the genus Spodoptera: S. littoralis (SL), with host range including both mono- and dicotyledonous plants and S. frugiperda (SF) Corn strain, primarily adapted to different grass species. C_LIO_LILarval performance on 23 crop and wild plant species from 17 families from terrestrial and wetland habitats was compared to an artificial diet in no-choice feeding bioassays. SL survived and performed better on most tested plants, particularly on the family level, except on two monocot plants (maize and leek), where SF performed well. There were five wild non-host plants where both generalists failed to survive. Nutrition indices assay corroborates the findings on a subset of plants. C_LIO_LIIn a subset of plants, larval feeding preference correlated partly, and larval attraction correlated well with larval performance. Female oviposition choice showed a weak correlation with larval performance. This weak correlation implies that these traits are decoupled, and other factors are crucial for female host plant selection. C_LIO_LIDuring larval dispersal greenhouse experiments, SL and SF larvae strongly tended to migrate onto their suitable host plants, indicating that this is one factor that modulates female host plant selection. C_LIO_LIIn summary, SL has a broader diet breath compared to SF, surviving on wild plants with no previous exposure. The present study provides the first comprehensive data on the diet breadth of two range-expanding and highly invasive polyphagous herbivores. C_LI

ecology↗

bioRxiv2018

Trace impurities in test stimuli can seriously compromise chemosensory studies

The discovery of olfactory receptors and major technological advances have greatly accelerated our understanding of chemosensory mechanisms. However, some of this rapid progress may be compromised by inadequate knowledge or characterization of the purity of chemical stimuli used to challenge olfactory or other chemoreceptors when mapping their response profiles. Here, we provide strong evidence that the presence of trace impurities in test stimuli can completely obscure true ligand-receptor relationships. DmOR7a, an olfactory receptor of the vinegar fly (Drosophila melanogaster) has been reported to respond to several long-chain aliphatic ligands such as a putative Drosophila pheromone1, the pheromone of the silkworm moth Bombyx mori2, and a common fatty acid, linoleic acid3. By contrast, we show that DmOR7a responds with high sensitivity to volatile impurities and degradation products present in minute quantities in authentic standards of those compounds, but not to the standards themselves. Responses to impurities can easily go unnoticed due to two main factors. First, the sensitivity of receptors to key ligands may be greater than that of analytical chemistry instruments used to check sample purity. Second, the concentration of highly volatile impurities in an odour puff may be orders of magnitude higher than the main component of a sample, due to the large differences in vapour pressures between the impurities and the main component. Issues concerning impurities are not limited to studies on olfaction that use odour puffs to characterize receptor-ligand interactions, but may affect all studies on chemosensation, from molecular biology and in-silico predictions to behaviour. Purity, which is crucial in receptor-ligand studies, is always implied, but rarely checked rigorously. To avoid misinterpretations, a proper account of all compounds present in test stimuli and an unequivocal confirmation of ligand affinity should accompany chemosensory studies.

neuroscience↗