bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Laroche, O.

Publications and source records attributed to Laroche, O..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Molecular methods reveal responses of bacterial communities, including indicator species, to ballast water management

Ballast water (BW) is an important vector for the global translocation of bacterial taxa, including pathogens. Legal frameworks establishing limits on the discharge of live organisms into recipient environments have been designed to reduce risks of microbial invasions, and understanding the impacts of BW management on bacterial communities is critical for assessing the effectiveness of these practices. Here we evaluate changes in bacterial communities associated with both BW treatment (BWT) and a combined management approach of BWT plus BW exchange (BWT+E). Samples were collected on two experimental voyages designed specifically to compare BW-associated biota before and after management. Microbial community structure and inferred function were assessed based on high throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons, and bacterial indicator taxa E. coli and enterococci were analyzed using targeted qPCR. As expected, both BWT alone and BWT+E dramatically changed bacterial communities, with the latter resulting in the largest overall decreases in bacterial diversity. Increases in Gammaproteobacteria, especially in the genus Pseudomonas, were particularly notable, with concomitant decreases in Alphaproteobacteria and Bacteroidia. Shifts in predicted bacterial function associated with BWT were similar for both voyages, despite significant differences in community structure, and may represent selection for r-strategists capable of active regrowth after BWT. qPCR estimates of indicator taxa were similar to those obtained through standard culture methods but may offer increased sensitivity for detecting changes associated with management. Our results indicate that BW management is effective at reducing bacterial communities but suggest that further research is needed to understand risks associated with taxa that may survive BWT.

ecology↗

From sea surface to seafloor: a benthic allochthonous eDNA survey for the abyssal ocean

Diverse and remote deep-sea communities are critically under-sampled and increasingly threatened by anthropogenic impacts. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding could facilitate rapid and comprehensive biotic surveys in the deep ocean, yet many aspects of the sources and distribution of eDNA in the deep sea are still poorly understood. In order to examine the influence of the water column on benthic eDNA surveys in regions targeted for deep-sea polymetallic nodule mining, we investigated the occurrence of pelagic eDNA across: (1) two different deep-sea habitat types, abyssal plains and seamounts, (2) benthic sample types, including nodules, sediment, and seawater within the benthic boundary layer (BBL), and (3) sediment depth horizons (0-2 cm, 3-5 cm). Little difference was observed between seamounts and the adjacent abyssal plains in the proportion of legacy pelagic eDNA sampled in the benthos, despite an > 1000 m depth difference for these habitats. In terms of both reads and amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), pelagic eDNA was minimal within sediment and nodule samples (< 2%), and is unlikely to affect benthic surveys that monitor resident organisms at the deep seafloor. However, pelagic eDNA was substantial within the BBL (up to 13 % ASVs, 86% reads), deriving both from the high biomass upper ocean as well as deep pelagic residents. While most pelagic eDNA found in sediments and on nodules could be sourced from the epipelagic for metazoans, protist legacy eDNA sampled on these substrates appeared to originate across a range of depths in the water column. Some evidence of eDNA degradation across a vertical sediment profile was observed for protists, with higher diversity in the 0-2 cm layer and a significantly lower proportion of legacy pelagic eDNA in deeper sediments (3-5 cm). Study-wide, our estimated metazoan sampling coverage ranged from 40% to 74%, despite relatively large sample size. Future deep-sea eDNA surveys should examine oceanographic influences on eDNA transport and residence times, consider habitat heterogeneity at a range of spatial scales in the abyss, and aim to process large amounts of material per sample (with replication) in order to increase the sampling coverage in these diverse deep ocean communities.

ecology↗