bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Lapteva, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Lapteva, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

OmiXAI: An Ensemble XAI Pipeline for Interpretable Deep Learning in Omics Data

Deep learning methods have become methods of choice in the analysis of genomic data. The performance of deep learning models depends on the information available for training. A growing trend in deep learning applications involves leveraging multi-omics data--spanning genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and other domains. When a deep learning model trained on omics data achieves high performance, the important question is to define factors that contribute to models predictive power. Explainable AI (XAI) methods can be categorized as model-aware and model-agnostic. Model-agnostic approaches, which rely on combinatorial feature perturbations to assess impact, are often computationally prohibitive for deep learning models. To address this, we developed OmiXAI, a pipeline integrating ensemble model-aware XAI methods. Our framework incorporates gradient-based techniques--including Integrated Gradients, InputXGradients, Guided Backpropagation, and Deconvolution (for CNNs and GNNs)--as well as Saliency Maps and GNNExplainer (specifically for GNNs). We evaluated OmiXAI on Z-DNA prediction using multi-omics features, demonstrating its efficacy through feature importance analysis and benchmarking of XAI methods. Notably, OmiXAI enabled feature engineering, reducing the critical feature set from almost 2,000 to just 50. Its modular design allows seamless integration of additional attribution methods, ensuring adaptability beyond omics to diverse problem domains. While testing the ensemble approach we benchmarked individual XAI methods and discuss their drawbacks and limitations. OmiXAI is freely available at https://github.com/aameliig/OmiXAI.

bioinformatics↗

Cognitive exertion affects the appraisal of one's own and other people's pain

Correctly evaluating others pain is a crucial prosocial ability, especially relevant for the healthcare system. In clinical settings, caregivers assess their patients pain under high workload and fatigue, often while dealing with competing information/tasks. However, the effect played by such cognitive strain in the appraisal of others pain remains unclear. Following embodied accounts that posit a shared representational code between self and others states, it could be hypothesized that the representation of peoples pain might be influenced by cognitive exertion similarly to first-hand experiences. Fifty participants underwent one of two demanding tasks, involving either working memory (Experiment 1: N-Back task) or cognitive interference (Experiment 2: Stroop task). After each task, participants were exposed to painful laser stimulations at three intensity levels (low, medium, high), or video-clips of patients experiencing three intensity levels of pain (low, medium, high). Participants rated the intensity of each pain event on a visual analogue scale. We found that the two tasks influenced rating of both ones own and others pain, by decreasing the sensitivity to medium and high events. This was observed either when comparing the demanding condition to a control (Stroop), or when modelling linearly the difficulty/performance of each depleting task (N-Back). We provide converging evidence that cognitive exertion affects the subsequent appraisal of ones own and likewise others pain. Healthcare personnel should be aware that high workload might alter their cognitive abilities. Perspectivethis research shows that cognitive effort aftereffects impact negatively the assessment of of medium/high pain in others, reminiscently to what was observed in first-hand experiences. Healthcare professionals should be aware that high workload and severe cognitive fatigue could affect their diagnostic skills.

neuroscience↗