Biology subjects

Langella, O.

Publications and source records attributed to Langella, O..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

ProteoBench: the community-curated platform for comparing proteomics data analysis workflows

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics is a well-established strategy for analyzing complex biological mixtures. Many MS instruments and data acquisition strategies are available, and the data they acquire differ substantially, thus requiring tailored analysis algorithms. Hence, many dedicated bioinformatics workflows are developed. These are in constant evolution, and the community lacks a centralized platform for comparing their performance. Here, we propose ProteoBench, a single platform that brings together software developers and software users to provide an ever-evolving comparison of state-of-the-art proteomics data processing tools. ProteoBench is an open-source resource that enables the community to evaluate data analysis workflows, develop benchmarking modules dedicated to specific comparisons, and discuss the best methods to compare software tools. The platform ensures that the benchmark evolves alongside advances in proteomics data analysis workflows. ProteoBench guides researchers towards the best-suited tool and parameters for their specific project and data according to their needs, and developers can test their newly developed tools or workflows privately, before adding them as public references. This community-driven effort will increase transparency and reproducibility between MS data analysis workflows, as well as facilitate the development and publication of software workflows in the field.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2023

Fast alignment of mass spectra in large proteomics datasets, capturing dissimilarities arising from multiple complex modifications of peptides

BackgroundIn proteomics, the interpretation of mass spectra representing peptides carrying multiple complex modifications is still challenging, currently limited by the number of potential modifications considered in a single analysis and the need to know them in advance. Further developments must be done in the field to help the scientific community to discover new post-translational modifications that play an essential role in disease and to understand how chemical modifications carried by food proteins could impact our health. ResultsTo make progress on this issue, we implemented SpecGlobX (SpecGlob eXTended to eXperimental spectra), a standalone Java application that quickly determines the best spectral alignments of a (possibly very large) list of Peptide-to-Spectrum Matches (PSMs) provided by any open modification search method, or generated by the user. As input, SpecGlobX reads a file containing spectra in MGF or mzML format and a semicolon-delimited spreadsheet describing the PSMs. As output, SpecGlobX returns the best alignment for each PSM, splitting the mass difference between the spectrum and the peptide into one or more shifts while considering the possibility of non-aligned masses (a phenomenon resulting from many situations including neutral losses). SpecGlobX is fast, able to align one million PSMs in about 1.5 minutes on a standard desktop. Firstly, we remind the foundations of the algorithm and detail how we adapted SpecGlob (the method we previously developed following the same aim, but limited to the interpretation of perfect simulated spectra) to the interpretation of imperfect experimental spectra. Then, we highlight the interest of SpecGlobX as a complementary tool downstream to three open modification search methods on a large simulated spectra dataset. Finally, we show on a smaller dataset that SpecGlobX performs equally well on experimental and simulated spectra. ConclusionsSpecGlobX is helpful as a decision support tool, providing keys to interpret peptides carrying complex modifications still poorly considered by current open modification search software. Better alignment of PSMs enhances confidence in the identification of spectra provided by open modification search methods and should improve the interpretation rate of spectra.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

A combined test for feature selection on sparse metaproteomics data - alternative to missing value imputation

One of the difficulties encountered in the statistical analysis of metaproteomics data is the high proportion of missing values, which are usually treated by imputation. Nevertheless, imputation methods are based on restrictive assumptions regarding missingness mechanisms, namely "at random" or "not at random". To circumvent these limitations in the context of feature selection in a multi-class comparison, we propose a univariate selection method that combines a test of association between missingness and classes, and a test for difference of observed intensities between classes. This approach implicitly handles both missingness mechanisms. We performed a quantitative and qualitative comparison of our procedure with imputation-based feature selection methods on two experimental data sets, as well as simulated data with various scenarios regarding the missingness mechanisms and the nature of the difference of expression (differential intensity or differential missingness). Whereas we observed similar performances in terms of prediction on the experimental data set, the feature ranking and selection from various imputation-based methods were strongly divergent. We showed that the combined test reaches a compromise by correlating reasonably with other methods, and remains efficient in all simulated scenarios unlike imputation-based feature selection methods.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

Critical Assessment of Metaproteome Investigation (CAMPI): a Multi-Lab Comparison of Established Workflows

Metaproteomics has matured into a powerful tool to assess functional interactions in microbial communities. While many metaproteomic workflows are available, the impact of method choice on results remains unclear. Here, we carried out the first community-driven, multi-laboratory comparison in metaproteomics: the critical assessment of metaproteome investigation study (CAMPI). Based on well-established workflows, we evaluated the effect of sample preparation, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatic analysis using two samples: a simplified, laboratory-assembled human intestinal model and a human fecal sample. We observed that variability at the peptide level was predominantly due to sample processing workflows, with a smaller contribution of bioinformatic pipelines. These peptide-level differences largely disappeared at the protein group level. While differences were observed for predicted community composition, similar functional profiles were obtained across workflows. CAMPI demonstrates the robustness of present-day metaproteomics research, serves as a template for multi-laboratory studies in metaproteomics, and provides publicly available data sets for benchmarking future developments.

microbiology↗