Biology subjects

Lamberth, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Lamberth, C..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Interspecific social contacts spread gut microbiota in wild rodent communities

Background: The mammalian gut microbiota influences a wide array of host phenotypes and varies substantially among individuals. Among conspecifics, microbiota composition is strongly shaped by microbial transmission through social interactions, yet the extent to which such transmission also occurs across species boundaries remains poorly understood. Here, we combine high-resolution tracking data collected over more than 10 months with gut microbiota profiling to examine social associations, space use, and microbiota similarity among individuals of three sympatric rodent species - wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus), yellow-necked mice (A. flavicollis) and bank voles (Myodes glareolus), in two woodlands. By integrating multi-species social networks and spatial overlap with individual microbiota data, we test how both conspecific and interspecific interactions shape gut microbiota composition. Results: At both study sites, social associations strongly predicted microbiota similarity among conspecific individuals, whereas spatial proximity consistently predicted microbiota similarity among interspecific pairs. In addition, social associations between mice of different species predicted microbiota similarity, although this effect was weaker than that observed within species and was asymmetric, with evidence for stronger microbial transmission from wood mice to yellow-necked mice than vice versa. By focusing on species-indicative bacterial taxa, we further show that wood mice with more social connections to yellow-necked mice harboured a greater richness of gut bacteria typical of yellow-necked mice. Conclusions: Together, these results demonstrate that individual-level social behaviour can influence gut microbial transmission across species boundaries, particularly among closely related species with overlapping ecological niches. Interspecific social interactions may therefore represent an underappreciated pathway for the acquisition of novel gut symbionts in multi-species communities.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2025

The gut microbiota of two rodents varies over fine spatial scales yet is minimally influenced by the environmental microbiota

The gut microbiota of animals varies considerably between individuals within the same population. Given the importance of gut microbiota composition for animal biology and ultimately fitness (e.g., via effects on physiology, immunity and even behaviour), there is considerable interest in understanding which factors shape its variation. Here, we tested whether local environments are an important source of microbial diversity for mammalian guts, by sampling the faecal microbiota of wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) and bank voles (Myodes glareolus), as well as environmental microbiotas, across Wytham Woods. We first find that both species share a low proportion of their microbiotas with local environments and that most shared microbes are aerotolerant. We then detect that microgeographic patterns (namely soil chemistry) are associated with variation in the microbiota of local environments but this does not translate to microbiota variation between animals. Nevertheless, between-individual gut microbiota variation is strongly associated with where animals are sampled, suggesting that other local factors (e.g., biotic environment, interactions between individuals) are much stronger predictors of microbiota composition than local abiotic factors. Finally, we find that wood mice (but not bank voles) are more likely to share microbes with local than non-local environments, but that local environments still contribute little to animal microbiotas. Our findings challenge the prevailing view that mammalian microbiotas are strongly affected by local soil chemistry or the abiotic environment, while further supporting the prediction that biotic and/or other intrinsic factors (which can also act on a local scale) contribute more to microbiota composition.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2023

Social and environmental transmission spread different sets of gut microbes in wild mice

Gut microbes shape many aspects of organismal biology, yet how these key bacteria transmit among hosts in natural populations remains poorly understood. Recent work in mammals has emphasized either transmission through social contacts or indirect transmission through environmental contact, but the relative importance of different routes has not been directly assessed. Here, we used a novel RFID-based tracking system to collect long-term high resolution data on social relationships, space use and microhabitat in a wild population of mice (Apodemus sylvaticus), while regularly characterising their gut microbiota. Through probabilistic modelling of the resulting data, we identify positive and statistically distinct signals of social and environmental transmission, captured by social networks and overlap in home ranges respectively. Strikingly, microbes with distinct biological attributes drove these different transmission signals. While aerotolerant spore-forming bacteria drove the effect of shared space use, a mix of taxa but especially anaerobic bacteria underpinned the social networks effect on gut microbiota similarity. These findings provide the first evidence for parallel social and environmental transmission of gut microbes that involve biologically distinct subsets of the mammalian gut microbiota. List of contributionsO_LIAura Raulo designed the study, helped develop the new RFID tracking technology, collected the data from Wytham, completed all laboratory analyses on gut microbiota profiling prior to sequencing, developed analytical methods, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript C_LIO_LIPaul Burkner helped design the Bayesian probabilistic modeling framework and provided feedback on the manuscript C_LIO_LIJarrah Dale helped collect field data using RFID loggers C_LIO_LIHolly English helped collect field data using RFID loggers and provided feedback on home range analyses C_LIO_LIGenevieve Finerty helped with home range analysis and the analysis of microhabitat variation and provided feedback on the manuscript C_LIO_LICurt Lamberth led development of RFID tracking devices and helped collect field data from Wytham C_LIO_LIJosh Firth supervised the research project, developed social network analysis methods and provided feedback on the analyses and the manuscript C_LIO_LITim Coulson supervised the research project and provided feedback on the analyses and the manuscript C_LIO_LISarah Knowles supervised the research project, helped develop the tracking technology and design the study, collected data from Wytham, planned and supervised laboratory methods, developed analytical methods and provided feedback on analyses and the manuscript. C_LI

ecology↗