bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kuosmanen, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Kuosmanen, T..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Normative assembly rule reveals fairness in microbial communities

Understanding and predicting how communities assemble is a paramount challenge in ecology. Here we address these questions normatively by comparing the ecological distribution of growth surplus to a game-theoretically fair distribution based on each species Shapley value. By analyzing in total 56 distinct community outcomes, we assess how fairly biomass is distributed in microbial communities displaying both competitive and cooperative interactions in different environmental conditions. We find examples of fair communities that closely follow their Shapley value across all environments as well as counterexamples where the true abundances deviate from the species objective contribution to community biomass. Our results give unique empirical insights into the distributive function of ecological dynamics and lay down the theoretical foundations of what might become a normative community assembly theory.

ecology↗

Non-ergodicity in ecology and evolution

Stochasticity plays an important role in all biological systems. The standard way to deal with stochasticity involves averaging over an ensemble of independent realizations. However, such mean statistics need not accurately reflect the typical outcomes in any finite sample unless the system satisfies the property of ergodicity, which guarantees that each trajectory will over time experience the same statistics as the entire ensemble. Here, we argue that, in contrast, non-ergodicity might instead be the rule rather than exception in real biological systems and investigate its implications for eco-evolutionary dynamics through three case-studies. First, we show how demographic stochasticity leads to ergodicity breaking where the asymptotic growth rate carries a signature of the initial condition. This motivates us to define a mutant establishment threshold, which quantifies a critical population size above which the typical mutant population starts to grow. Second, we consider environmental stochasticity and demonstrate that autocorrelated environmental variation does not average out in time, which has the important consequence that the fitness of a genotype cannot be simply averaged over the environments. Finally, we show how in a metapopulation structure the evolutionary dynamics within a typical subpopulation can deviate from the ensemble dynamics in the entire metapopulation, which is sufficient to explain the evolution and persistence of cooperation despite a fitness cost.

evolutionary biology↗

Data-driven symbolic regression reveals microbial growth laws

O_LIConnecting mathematical models with empirically measured microbial growth has remained challenging, as numerous competing models based on different theoretical approaches can fit observations. Therefore, we develop a method to automatically propose growth models from microbial data alone. We validate this approach using an available dataset of E. coli grown on known resources, and study sixteen species across various concentrations of a rich medium. C_LIO_LIThe inherently interpretable approach of symbolic regression infers explicit dynamical models directly from growth data. Using symbolic regression natively, does not favour biologically interpretable models, but we find cumulative population gain to be a more informative machine learning feature than population size. C_LIO_LIRandom Forest machine learning allows us to relate this finding to the approximation of a constant-rate per capita resource consumption. This suggests that the area under the growth curve (AUC) measured in routine experiments provides information on the effective resource dynamics governing microbial growth. Finally, we use theoretical insights to inform the symbolic regression algorithm and favour biologically interpretable models. C_LIO_LIOverall, we found that balancing between data fit, parsimony and biological relevance favoured both the simplest, linear approximation, and models based on a Monod dynamics, with either one or two underlying resources. Therefore, our approach to read growth laws off of microbial batch cultures provides insights on data-driven modelling. C_LI

ecology↗

A Systematic Assessment of Robustness in CNS Safety Pharmacology

Irwin tests are key preclinical study elements for characterizing drug-induced neurological side effects. This multicenter study aimed to assess the robustness of Irwin tests across multinational sites during three stages of protocol harmonization. The projects were part of the EQIPD framework (Enhanced Quality in Preclinical Data, https://quality-preclinical-data.eu/), aiming to increase success rates in transition from preclinical testing to clinical application. Female and male NMRI mice were assigned to one of three groups (vehicle, 0.1 mg/kg MK-801, 0.3 mg/kg MK-801). Irwin scores were assessed at baseline and multiple times following injection of MK-801, a non-competitive NMDA antagonist, using local protocols (stage 1), a shared protocol with harmonized environmental design (stage 2), and fully harmonized Irwin scoring protocols (stage 3). The analysis based on the four functional domains (motor, autonomic, sedation, and excitation) revealed substantial data variability in stages 1 and 2. Although there was still marked overall heterogeneity between sites in stage 3 after complete harmonization of the Irwin scoring scheme, heterogeneity was only moderate within functional domains. When comparing treatment groups vs. vehicle, we found large effect sizes in the motor domain and subtle to moderate effects in the excitation-related and autonomic domain. The pronounced interlaboratory variability in Irwin datasets for the CNS-active compound MK-801 needs to be carefully considered by companies and experimenters when making decisions during drug development. While environmental and general study design had a minor impact, the study suggests that harmonization of parameters and their scoring can limit variability and increase robustness.

neuroscience↗

Quantifying massively parallel microbial growth with spatially mediated interactions

Quantitative understanding of microbial growth is an essential prerequisite for successful control of pathogens as well as various biotechnology applications. Even though the growth of cell populations has been extensively studied, microbial growth remains poorly characterized at the spatial level. Indeed, even isogenic populations growing at different locations on solid growth medium typically show significant location-dependent variability in growth. Here we show that this variability can be attributed to an interplay between populations interacting with their local environment and the diffusion of nutrients and energy sources coupling the environments, i.e. interpopulation interactions are mediated via the shared environment. We use a dual approach, first applying machine learning regression models to discover that location dominates growth variability at specific times, and, in parallel, developing explicit population growth models to describe this spatial effect. In particular, treating nutrient and energy source concentration as a latent variable allows us to develop a mechanistic resource consumer model that captures growth variability across the shared environment. As a consequence, we are able to determine intrinsic growth parameters for each local population, removing confounders common to location-dependent variability in growth. Importantly, our explicit low parametric model for the environment paves the way for massively parallel experimentation with configurable spatial niches for testing specific eco-evolutionary hypotheses. Author summaryImage-based platforms allow obtaining population size estimates for massively parallel growth experiments on substrate plates at relatively low cost. However, such population size data has been shown to display a high degree of spatial variability, which occurs even with isogenic populations. Here we first quantified the importance of spatial location on growth variation using a machine learning approach, and then developed spatially aware population growth models to explain the spatial structure of the growth data. Ultimately, we showed that a spatial consumer-resource model with local microhabitats connected via diffusion can fully explain the observed spatial variation in growth while allowing the inference of intrinsic growth parameters of specific populations. This result provides a method for systematic extraction of spatial growth models and paves the way for massively parallel eco-evolutionary experimentation.

ecology↗

Turnover shapes evolution of birth and death rates

Population turnover, a key trait shaped by the organisms life history strategy, plays an important role in eco-evolutionary dynamics by fixing the timescale for individual birth and death events as well as in determining the level of demographic stochasticity related to growth. Yet, the standard theory of population genetics, and the models heavily used in the related data analysis, have largely ignored the role of turnover. Here we propose a reformulation of population genetics starting from the first principles of birth and death and show that the role of turnover is evolutionarily important. We derive a general stochastic differential equation for the frequency dynamics of competing birth-death processes and determine the appropriate turnover corrections for the essential results regarding fixation, establishment, and substitution of mutants. Our results reveal how both the absolute and relative turnover rates influence evolution. We further describe a deterministic turnover selection, the turnover flux, which operates in small populations. Finally, we analyse the evolution of mean turnover and show how it explains the key eco-evolutionary mechanisms underlying demographic transitions. In conclusion, our results explicitly show how competing life-history strategies, demographic stochasticity, ecological feedback, and evolution are inseparably intertwined, thus calling for a unified theory development starting from the underlying mechanisms of birth and death.

evolutionary biology↗

Drug-induced resistance evolution necessitates less aggressive treatment

Evolution of drug resistance to anticancer, antimicrobial and antiviral therapies is widespread among cancer and pathogen cell populations. Classical theory posits strictly that genetic and phenotypic variation is generated in evolving populations independently of the selection pressure. However, recent experimental findings among antimicrobial agents, traditional cytotoxic chemotherapies and targeted cancer therapies suggest that treatment not only imposes selection but also affects the rate of adaptation via altered mutational processes. Here we analyze a model with drug-induced increase in mutation rate and explore its consequences for treatment optimization. We argue that the true biological cost of treatment is not limited to the harmful side-effects, but instead realizes even more profoundly by fundamentally changing the underlying eco-evolutionary dynamics within the microenvironment. Factoring in such costs (or collateral damage) of control is at the core of successful therapy design and can unify different evolution-based approaches to therapy optimization. Using the concept of evolutionary rescue, we formulate the treatment as an optimal control problem and solve the optimal elimination strategy, which minimizes the probability of evolutionary rescue. Our solution exploits a trade-off, where increasing the drug concentration has two opposing effects. On the one hand, it reduces de novo mutations by decreasing the size of the target cell population faster; on the other hand, a higher dosage generates a surplus of treatment-induced mutations. We show that aggressive elimination strategies, which aim at eradication as fast as possible and which represent the current standard of care, can be detrimental even with modest drug-induced increases (fold change[≤] 10) to the baseline mutation rate. Our findings highlight the importance of dose dependencies in resistance evolution and motivate further investigation of the mutagenicity and other hidden collateral costs of therapies that promote resistance. Author summaryThe evolution of drug resistance is a particularly problematic and frequent outcome of cancer and antimicrobial therapies. Recent research suggests that these treatments may enhance the evolvability of the target population not only via inducing intense selection pressures but also via altering the underlying mutational processes. Here we investigate the consequences of such drug-induced evolution by considering a mathematical model with explicitly dose-dependent mutation rate. We identify, characterize and exploit a trade-off between decreasing the target population size as fast as possible and generating a surplus of treatment-induced de novo mutations. By formulating the treatment as an optimal control problem over the evolution of the target population, we find the optimal treatment strategy, which minimizes the probability of evolutionary rescue. We show that this probability changes non-monotonically with the cumulative drug concentration and is minimized at an intermediate dosage. Our results are immediately amenable to experimental investigation and motivate further study of the various mutagenic and other hidden collateral costs of treatment. Taken together, our results add to the ongoing criticism of the standard practice of administering aggressive, high-dose therapies and stimulate further clinical trials on alternative treatment strategies.

evolutionary biology↗