bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kulemin, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Kulemin, N..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing

BackgroundMGISEQ-2000 developed by MGI Tech Co. Ltd. (a subsidiary of the BGI Group) is a new competitor of such next-generation sequencing platforms as NovaSeq and HiSeq (Illumina). Its sequencing principle is based on the DNB and cPAS technologies, which were also used in the previous version of the BGISEQ-500 device. However, the reagents for MGISEQ-2000 have been refined and the platform utilizes updated software. The cPAS method is an advanced technology based on cPAL previously created by Complete Genomics. ResultIn this paper, the authors compare the results of the whole-genome sequencing of a DNA sample from a Russian female donor performed on MGISEQ-2000 and Illumina HiSeq 2500 (both PE150). Two platforms were compared in terms of sequencing quality, number of errors and performance. Additionally, we performed variant calling using four different software packages: Samtools mpileaup, Strelka2, Sentieon, and GATK. The accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detection was similar in the data generated by MGISEQ-2000 and HiSeq 2500, which was used as a reference. At the same time, a separate indel analysis of the overall error rate revealed similar FPR values and lower sensitivity. Conclusionsit may be concluded with confidence that the data generated by the analyzed sequencing systems is characterized by comparable magnitudes of error and that MGISEQ-2000 can be used for a wide range of research tasks on par with HiSeq 2500.

genomics↗

Genome-Wide Association Studies Identify 15 Genetic Markers Associated with Marmite Taste Preference

Marmite is a popular food eaten around the world, to which individuals have commonly considered themselves either \"lovers\" or \"haters\". We aimed to determine whether this food preference has a genetic basis.Weperformed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for Marmite taste preference using genotype and questionnaire data froma cohort of 261 healthy adults. We found 1 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associated with Marmite taste preferencethat reached genome-wide significance (p<5x10-8) in our GWAS analyses. We found another 4 SNPsassociated with Marmite taste preference that reached genome-wide significance (p<5x10-8) in at leastoneGWAS and/or for at least one phenotype analysed. Moreover, we identified 10 additional SNPs potentially associated with Marmite taste preference through candidate gene analysis. Our results indicate that there is a genetic basis to Marmite taste preference and we have identified 15 genetic markers for this trait. Overall, we conclude that Marmite tastepreference is a complex human trait influenced by multiple genetic markers, as well as the environment.\n\nSummary of Main Results O_TEXTBOXO_LIMarmite taste preference is a complex human trait with many factors influencing whether an individual loves or hates Marmite.\nC_LIO_LIThe relative contribution of genetics versus environment (ie. heritability) for Marmite taste preference is unknown.\nC_LIO_LIThe genetic contribution to Marmite taste preference involves multiple genetic markers each contributing a small amount (ie. the trait is polygenic). There is not one single Marmite gene with a large contribution like in thecase of the TAS2R38gene and bitter taste perception.\nC_LIO_LIWe have found a total of 15 SNPs associated with Marmite taste preference: 5 SNPs by a genetic-association screen atgenome-wide significance, and 10 SNPs by a candidate gene approach at nominal significance.\nC_LIO_LIWe did not find an association between the TAS2R38bitter taste receptor gene and Marmite taste preference.\nC_LIO_LIIt is important to independently replicate the findings of this study in order to validate these genetic markers and get a more accurate idea of their true effect on Marmite taste preference.\nC_LI\n\nC_TEXTBOX

genetics↗