Biology subjects

Krysiak, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Krysiak, K..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Spontaneous aggressive ERα+ mammary tumor model is driven by Kras activation

The NRL-PRL murine model, defined by mammary-selective transgenic rat prolactin ligand rPrl expression, establishes spontaneous ER+ mammary tumors, mimicking the association between elevated prolactin (PRL) and risk for development of ER+ breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Whole genome and exome sequencing in a discovery cohort (n=5) of end stage tumors revealed canonical activating mutations and copy number amplifications of Kras. The frequent mutations in this pathway were validated in an extension cohort, identifying activating Ras alterations in 79% (23/29) of tumors. Transcriptome analyses over the course of oncogenesis revealed marked alterations associated with Ras activity in established tumors, compared to preneoplastic tissues, in cell-intrinsic processes associated with mitosis, cell adhesion and invasion, as well as in the tumor microenvironment, including immune activity. These genomic analyses suggest that PRL induces a selective bottleneck for spontaneous Ras-driven tumors which may model a subset of aggressive clinical ER+ breast cancers.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2018

A harmonized meta-knowledgebase of clinical interpretations of cancer genomic variants

Precision oncology relies on the accurate discovery and interpretation of genomic variants to enable individualized diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy selection. We found that knowledgebases containing clinical interpretations of somatic cancer variants are highly disparate in interpretation content, structure, and supporting primary literature, impeding consensus when evaluating variants and their relevance in a clinical setting. With the cooperation of experts of the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) and six prominent cancer variant knowledgebases, we developed a framework for aggregating and harmonizing variant interpretations to produce a meta-knowledgebase of 12,856 aggregate interpretations covering 3,437 unique variants in 415 genes, 357 diseases, and 791 drugs. We demonstrated large gains in overlap between resources across variants, diseases, and drugs as a result of this harmonization. We subsequently demonstrated improved matching between a patient cohort and harmonized interpretations of potential clinical significance, observing an increase from an average of 33% per individual knowledgebase to 56% in aggregate. Our analyses illuminate the need for open, interoperable sharing of variant interpretation data. We also provide an open and freely available web interface (search.cancervariants.org) for exploring the harmonized interpretations from these six knowledgebases.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Standard operating procedure for somatic variant refinement of tumor sequencing data

PurposeManual review of aligned sequencing reads is required to develop a high-quality list of somatic variants from massively parallel sequencing data (MPS). Despite widespread use in analyzing MPS data, there has been little attempt to describe methods for manual review, resulting in high inter- and intra-lab variability in somatic variant detection and characterization of tumors.\n\nMethodsOpen source software was used to develop an optimal method for manual review setup. We also developed a systemic approach to visually inspect each variant during manual review.\n\nResultsWe present a standard operating procedures for somatic variant refinement for use by manual reviewers. The approach is enhanced through representative examples of 4 different manual review categories that indicate a reviewers confidence in the somatic variant call and 19 annotation tags that contextualize commonly observed sequencing patterns during manual review. Representative examples provide detailed instructions on how to classify variants during manual review to rectify lack of confidence in automated somatic variant detection.\n\nConclusionStandardization of somatic variant refinement through systematization of manual review will improve the consistency and reproducibility of identifying true somatic variants after automated variant calling.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

The prognostic effects of somatic mutations in ER-positive breast cancer

More than 50 genes are recurrently affected by somatic mutation in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer but prognostic effects have not been definitively established. Primary tumor DNA was therefore subjected to targeted sequencing from 625 postmenopausal (UBC-TAM series) and 328 premenopausal (MA12 trial) hormone receptor-positive (HR+) patients. Independent validation of prognostic interactions was achieved using independent data from the METABRIC study. Associations between MAP3K1 and PIK3CA with luminal A status and TP53 mutations with Luminal B/non-luminal tumors were observed, validating the methodological approach. In UBC-TAM, NF1 frame-shift nonsense (FS/NS) mutation was validated as a poor outcome driver. For MA12, poor outcome associated with PIK3R1 mutation was similarly validated. DDR1 mutations were strongly associated with poor prognosis in UBC-TAM despite stringent false-discovery correction (q=0.0003). In conclusion, uncommon recurrent somatic mutations should be further explored to create a more complete explanation of the highly variable outcomes that typify ER+ breast cancer.

genomics↗