bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Koohy, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Koohy, H..

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Beyond Better Models: Barriers and a Path Forward in Generalisable TCR Antigen Specificity Prediction

T cells are at the centre of adaptive immunity, protecting the organism against infection and cancer. T cell receptors (TCRs), expressed on the surface of T cells, enable the recognition of target cells through interactions with peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) molecules. Reliable, large-scale mapping of TCRs to their cognate pMHCs remains a holy grail of modern systems immunology, with far-reaching implications for cancer immunotherapy, vaccine development, and the understanding and treatment of autoimmune diseases. While exhaustive experimental mapping remains intractable due to the enormous combinatorial sequence space of TCRs and pMHCs, computational approaches offer a promising alternative. Consequently, we have witnessed increasingly sophisticated computational models of TCR antigen specificity, from small neural networks to deep generative models and large protein language models. However, several independent benchmarks have shown that these models, despite their size and sophistication, largely fail to generalise to TCRs or pMHCs not present in the data available during model development. Here, we investigate possible reasons for this and suggest a path forward to generalisable TCR:pMHC prediction. First, our analysis of the largest public repositories of TCR:pMHC data reveals significant biases towards a small number of antigens and MHC molecules, sparse sampling of TCR sequence space per pMHC, as well as inconsistencies and inaccuracies in data collation. Second, we show the importance of carefully setting up model evaluation to measure discrimination based on antigen specificity instead of confounding factors present in the evaluation data. Finally, we highlight the need for and propose how best to match the evaluation metric with the specific downstream application of the predictions. Our investigation suggests that we, as a community, need more representative and better curated data, and a robust set of metrics and benchmarks to guide future model development towards generalisable TCR:pMHC specificity prediction.

immunology↗

Distinct transcriptional states of draining lymph node T cells following influenza vaccination in individuals with underrepresented ancestries

The transcriptional and cell repertoire changes of lymph node (LN) T cells following influenza vaccination have been under-investigated across different ethnicities. Draining (dLN) and non-draining (ndLN) axillary LN cells from 17 participants with genotypically varied African or Asian ancestry (ISRCTN13657999) were collected by fine needle aspiration (FNA) before, 5 days and 42 days after adjuvanted influenza vaccination and analysed by single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq). The early dLN transcriptional profile and cellular dynamics were distinct from the ndLN; BACH2 expressing T cells were highly induced, exhibiting stem-like and unique quiescence signatures. Proliferating T follicular helper cells (Tfh) were enriched in dLN and Th1-like Tfh predominated with highly induced transcriptional changes. The BACH2+ T cell state and Th1-like Tfh cells, transcriptionally distinct from germinal centre (GC) T cells, were co-localised with LAMP3+ dendritic cells in the T cell zone of publicly available LN datasets, a region that was also distinct from GC Tfh niches. Together, these findings indicate that the induction of a robust, proliferative, and transcriptionally diverse Tfh response, alongside a discrete subset of BACH2+ T cells, represents a marked feature of the early T cell zone immune response to adjuvanted influenza vaccine in the dLN.

immunology↗

Characterising AlphaFold 3s ability to predict T cellantigen specificity

T cells are a key part of the adaptive immune system. Using their surface-bound T cell antigen receptors (TCRs), these cells scan peptides and other antigens presented to them by major histocompatibility complex molecules (MHCs) on the surface of cells, searching for abnormalities. Although determining the map between TCRs and their target antigens is of vital importance for the design of safe and effective T cell-based vaccines and therapeutics, decoding these interactions is challenging. Experimental methods are not scalable, and sequence-based computational methods have issues generalising to new antigens. The IMMREP25 benchmark of methods for predicting T cell antigen specificity showed that AlphaFold-based methods promise improved generalisation to novel antigens. However, the ability of structure prediction models to predict T cell antigen specificity has not been robustly evaluated previously. In this work, we characterise AlphaFolds ability to predict T cell antigen specificity. We created a pipeline for high-throughput prediction of TCR:peptide-MHC (pMHC) structures using AlphaFold that is > 100 fold faster than the default implementation and used it to benchmark AlphaFold 3 (AF3) and similar models at predicting T cell antigen specificity. We investigated the underlying correlates of AlphaFold-derived binding scores and found that the models predictive power is related to the positioning of TCRs over the pMHC and not chemical interactions. Furthermore, we refine the AlphaFold-derived binding scores by training a machine learning model we call the PAE Aggregator. We then investigate AF3s ability to uncover the clustering rules of TCR repertoires and recapitulate mutational scanning experiments. These analyses show that AlphaFold3 clusters sequence-similar TCRs according to their binding mode and detects disrupting point mutations accurately. Our results highlight both the promise and the current limitations of structure-based approaches for predicting TCR specificity, guiding the development of more reliable immunological prediction methods.

systems biology↗

Postnatal Reprogramming Shapes Human Intestinal Epithelial Immune Competency

At birth, the intestine must rapidly adapt to enable nutritional function and immune microbial tolerance. Here, integrating single-cell multi-omics and spatial transcriptomics we define the circuits underpinning this process. We identify asynchronous developmental trajectories with postnatal epithelial reprogramming characterised by coordinated changes in metabolism, junctional structure and innate defence. At birth epithelial stem cells demonstrate dynamic enhancer remodelling, with accessibility often preceding transcription. Fetal stemness elements remain accessible despite reduced transcription across epithelial lineages, retaining plasticity potential. Post-natal epithelia experience sequential homing of myeloid cells followed by innate T cells with peri-epithelial B cells localising later in infancy. Using developmentally staged organoids, we show that epithelial responses to inflammatory stimuli are age-dependent and constrained in early life. We identify BHLHE40 as an early-life regulator that attenuates the impact of interferon- and NF-{kappa}B-driven signalling. Altogether we define the events driving epithelial licensing and barrier adaptation at birth and through infancy.

cell biology↗

Quantifying conformational changes in the TCR:pMHC-I binding interface

T cells form one of the key pillars of adaptive immunity. Using their surface bound T cell antigen receptors (TCRs), these cells screen millions of antigens presented by major histocompatability complex (MHC) or MHC-like molecules. In other protein families, the dynamics of protein-protein interactions have important implications for protein function. Case studies of TCR:class I peptide-MHCs (pMHC-Is) structures have reported mixed results on whether the binding interfaces undergo conformational change during engagement and no robust statistical quantification has been done to generalise these results. It thus remains an open question if movement occurs in the binding interface that enables recognition and activation of T cells. In this work, we quantify the conformational changes in the TCR:pMHC-I binding interface by creating a dataset of 358 structures, comprising 25 TCRs, 20 MHC alleles, and 58 peptide structures in both unbound (apo) and bound (holo) conformations. In support of some case studies, we demonstrate that all complimentary determining region (CDR) loops move to a certain extent but only CDR3 and CDR3{beta} loops modify their shape when binding pMHC-Is. We also map out the contacts between TCRs and pMHC-Is, generating a novel fingerprint of TCRs on MHC molecules and show that the CDR3 tends to bind the N-terminus of the peptide and the CDR3{beta} tends to bind the C-terminus of the peptide. Finally, we show that the presented peptides can undergo conformational changes when engaged by TCRs, as has been reported in past literature, but novelly show these changes depend on how the peptides are anchored in the MHC binding groove. Our work has implications in understanding the behaviour of TCR:pMHC-I interactions and providing insights that can be used for modelling T cell antigen specificity, an ongoing grand challenge in immunology.

immunology↗

A comparison of clustering models for inference of T cell receptor antigen specificity

The vast potential sequence diversity of TCRs and their ligands has presented an historic barrier to computational prediction of TCR epitope specificity, a holy grail of quantitative immunology. One common approach is to cluster sequences together, on the assumption that similar receptors bind similar epitopes. Here, we provide an independent evaluation of widely used clustering algorithms for TCR specificity inference, observing some variability in predictive performance between models, and marked differences in scalability. Despite these differences, we find that different algorithms produce clusters with high degrees of similarity for receptors recognising the same epitope. Our analysis highlights an unmet need for improvement of complex models over a simple Hamming distance comparator, and strengthens the case for use of clustering models in TCR specificity inference.

immunology↗

A robust deep learning platform to predict CD8+ T-cell epitopes

T-cells play a crucial role in the adaptive immune system by inducing an anti-tumour response, defending against pathogens, and maintaining tolerance against self-antigens, which has sparked interest in the development of T-cell-based vaccines and immunotherapies. Because screening antigens driving the T-cell response is currently low-throughput and laborious, computational methods for predicting CD8+ T-cell epitopes have emerged. However, most immunogenicity algorithms struggle to learn features of peptide immunogenicity from small datasets, suffer from HLA bias and are unable to reliably predict pathology-specific CD8+ T-cell epitopes. Therefore, we developed TRAP (T-cell recognition potential of HLA-I presented peptides), a robust deep learning platform for predicting CD8+ T-cell epitopes from MHC-I presented pathogenic and self-peptides. TRAP uses transfer learning, deep learning architecture and MHC binding information to make context-specific predictions of CD8+ T-cell epitopes. TRAP also detects low-confidence predictions for peptides that differ significantly from those in the training datasets to abstain from making incorrect predictions. To estimate the immunogenicity of pathogenic peptides with low-confidence predictions, we further developed a novel metric, RSAT (relative similarity to autoantigens and tumour-associated antigens), as a complementary to dissimilarity to self from cancer studies. We used TRAP to identify epitopes from glioblastoma patients as well as SARS-CoV-2 peptides, and it outperformed other algorithms in both cancer and pathogenic settings. Thus, this study presents a novel computational platform for accurately predicting CD8+ T-cell epitopes to foster a better understanding of antigen-specific T-cell response and the development of effective clinical therapeutics. HighlightsO_LIHLA bias and out-of-distribution problem are causes of poor performance of current state-of-the-art algorithms C_LIO_LITransfer learning, deep learning architecture, context-specific and HLA-generalised approaches improve CD8+ T-cell epitope prediction C_LIO_LITRAP reports degree of correctness to improve reliability of the prediction C_LIO_LIA novel metric termed RSAT estimates immunogenicity of pathogenic peptides, as a complementary to dissimilarity to self from cancer studies C_LI

bioinformatics↗

A systems approach evaluating the impact of SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern mutations on CD8+ T cell responses

T cell recognition of SARS-CoV-2 antigens after vaccination and/or natural infection has played a central role in resolving SARS-CoV-2 infections and generating adaptive immune memory. However, the clinical impact of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses is variable and the mechanisms underlying T cell interaction with target antigens are not fully understood. This is especially true given the virus rapid evolution, which leads to new variants with immune escape capacity. In this study, we used the Omicron variant as a model organism and took a systems approach to evaluate the impact of mutations on CD8+ T cell immunogenicity. We computed an immunogenicity potential score for each SARS-CoV-2 peptide antigen from the ancestral strain and Omicron, capturing both antigen presentation and T cell recognition probabilities. By comparing ancestral vs. Omicron immunogenicity scores, we reveal a divergent and heterogeneous landscape of impact for CD8+ T cell recognition of mutated targets in Omicron variants. While T cell recognition of Omicron peptides is broadly preserved, we observed mutated peptides with deteriorated immunogenicity that may assist breakthrough infection in some individuals. We then combined our scoring scheme with an in-silico mutagenesis, to characterise the position- and residue-specific theoretical mutational impact on immunogenicity. While we predict many escape trajectories from the theoretical landscape of substitutions, our study suggests that Omicron mutations in T cell epitopes did not develop under cell-mediated pressure. Our study provides a generalisable platform for fostering a deeper understanding of existing and novel variant impact on antigen-specific vaccine- and/or infection-induced T cell immunity.

immunology↗

HLA-dependent variation in SARS-CoV-2 CD8+ T cell cross-reactivity with human coronaviruses

Pre-existing T cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in individuals without prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2 has been reported in several studies. While emerging evidence hints toward prior exposure to common-cold human coronaviruses (HCoV), the extent of- and conditions for-cross-protective immunity between SARS-CoV-2 and HCoVs remain open. Here, by leveraging a comprehensive pool of publicly available functionally evaluated SARS-CoV-2 peptides, we report 126 immunogenic SARS-CoV-2 peptides with high sequence similarity to 285 MHC-presented target peptides from at least one of four HCoV, thus providing a map describing the landscape of SARS-CoV-2 shared and private immunogenic peptides with functionally validated T cell responses. Using this map, we show that while SARS-CoV-2 immunogenic peptides in general exhibit higher level of dissimilarity to both self-proteome and -microbiomes, there exist several SARS-CoV-2 immunogenic peptides with high similarity to various human protein coding genes, some of which have been reported to have elevated expression in severe COVID-19 patients. We then combine our map with a SARS-CoV-2-specific TCR repertoire data from COVID-19 patients and healthy controls and show that whereas the public repertoire for the majority of convalescent patients are dominated by TCRs cognate to private SARS-CoV-2 peptides, for a subset of patients, more than 50% of their public repertoires that show reactivity to SARS-CoV-2, consist of TCRs cognate to shared SARS-CoV-2-HCoV peptides. Further analyses suggest that the skewed distribution of TCRs cognate to shared and private peptides in COVID-19 patients is likely to be HLA-dependent. Finally, by utilising the global prevalence of HLA alleles, we provide 10 peptides with known cognate TCRs that are conserved across SARS-CoV-2 and multiple human coronaviruses and are predicted to be recognised by a high proportion of the global population. Overall, our work indicates the potential for HCoV-SARS-CoV-2 reactive CD8+ T cells, which is likely dependent on differences in HLA-coding genes among individuals. These findings may have important implications for COVID-19 heterogeneity and vaccine-induced immune responses as well as robustness of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and its variants.

immunology↗

HLA binding of self-peptides is biased towards proteins with specific molecular functions

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is highly polymorphic and plays a key role in guiding adaptive immune responses by presenting foreign and self peptides to T cells. Each HLA variant selects a minor fraction of peptides that match a certain motif required for optimal interaction with the peptide-binding groove. These restriction rules define the landscape of peptides presented to T cells. Given these limitations, one might suggest that the choice of peptides presented by HLA is non-random and there is preferential presentation of an array of peptides that is optimal for distinguishing self and foreign proteins. In this study we explore these preferences with a comparative analysis of self peptides enriched and depleted in HLA ligands. We show that HLAs exhibit preferences towards presenting peptides from certain proteins while disfavoring others with specific functions, and highlight differences between various HLA genes and alleles in those preferences. We link those differences to HLA anchor residue propensities and amino acid composition of preferentially presented proteins. The set of proteins that peptides presented by a given HLA are most likely to be derived from can be used to distinguish between class I and class II HLAs and HLA alleles. Our observations can be extrapolated to explain the protective effect of certain HLA alleles in infectious diseases, and we hypothesize that they can also explain susceptibility to certain autoimmune diseases and cancers. We demonstrate that these differences lead to differential presentation of HIV, influenza virus, SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 proteins by various HLA alleles. Finally, we show that the reported self peptidome preferences of distinct HLA variants can be compensated by combinations of HLA-A/HLA-B and HLA-A/HLA-C alleles in frequent haplotypes.

bioinformatics↗

Evaluating performance of existing computational models in predicting CD8+ T cell pathogenic epitopes and cancer neoantigens

T cell recognition of a cognate peptide-MHC complex (pMHC) presented on the surface of infected or malignant cells, is of utmost importance for mediating robust and long-term immune responses. Accurate predictions of cognate pMHC targets for T Cell Receptors (TCR) would greatly facilitate identification of vaccine targets for both pathogenic diseases as well as personalized cancer immunotherapies. Predicting immunogenic peptides therefore has been at the centre of intensive research for the past decades but has proven challenging. Although numerous models have been proposed, performance of these models has not been systematically evaluated and their success rate in predicting epitopes in the context of human pathology, has not been measured and compared. In this study, we evaluated the performance of several publicly available models, in identifying immunogenic CD8+ T cell targets in the context of pathogens and cancers. We found that for predicting immunogenic peptides from an emerging virus such as SARS-CoV-2, none of the models perform substantially better than random or offer considerable improvement beyond HLA ligand prediction. We also observed suboptimal performance for predicting cancer neoantigens. Through investigation of potential factors associated with ill performance of models, we highlight several data- and model-associated issues. In particular, we observed that cross-HLA variation in the distribution of immunogenic and non-immunogenic peptides in training data of the models seem to substantially confound the predictions. We additionally compared key parameters associated with immunogenicity between pathogenic peptides and cancer neoantigens and observed evidence for differences in the thresholds of binding affinity and stability, which suggested the need to modulate different features in identifying immunogenic pathogen vs. cancer peptides. Overall, we demonstrate that accurate and reliable prediction of immunogenic CD8+ T cell targets remains unsolved, thus we hope our work will guide users and model developers regarding potential pitfalls and unsettled questions in existing immunogenicity predictors.

immunology↗

CD8+ T cell cross-reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 conferred by other coronavirus strains and influenza virus

While individuals infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) manifested a broad range in susceptibility and severity to the disease, the pre-existing immune memory of related pathogens can influence the disease outcome. Here, we investigated the potential extent of T cell cross-reactivity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that can be conferred by other coronaviruses and influenza virus, and generated a map of public and private predicted CD8+ T cell epitopes between coronaviruses. Moreover, to assess the potential risk of self-reactivity and/or diminished T cell response for peptides identical or highly similar to the host, we identified predicted epitopes with high sequence similarity with human proteome. Lastly, we compared predicted epitopes from coronaviruses with epitopes from influenza virus deposited in IEDB to support vaccine development against different virus strains. We believe the comprehensive in silico profile of private and public predicted epitopes across coronaviruses and influenza viruses will facilitate design of vaccines capable of protecting against various viral infections.

immunology↗