Knutsson, H. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2018

Using the residual bootstrap to quantify uncertainty in mean apparent propagator MRI

Estimation of noise-induced variability in MAP-MRI is needed to properly characterize the amount of uncertainty in quantities derived from the estimated MAP-MRI coefficients. Bootstrap metrics, such as the standard deviation, provides additional valuable diffusion information in addition to common MAP-MRI parameters, and can be incorporated in MAP-MRI studies to provide more extensive insight. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to study the uncertainty of MAP-MRI derived metrics. The noise variability of quantities of MAP-MRI have been quantified using the residual bootstrap, in which the residuals are resampled using two sampling schemes. The residual bootstrap method can provide empirical distributions for MAP-MRI derived quantities, even when the exact distributions are not easily derived. The residual bootstrap methods are applied to SPARC data and HCP-MGH data, and empirical distributions are obtained for the zero-displacement probabilities. Here, we compare and contrast the residual bootstrap schemes using all shells and within the same shell. We show that residual resampling within each shell generates larger uncertainty than using all shells for the HCP-MGH data. Standard deviation and quartile coefficient maps of the estimated variability are provided.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Cluster Failure Revisited: Impact of First Level Design and Data Quality on Cluster False Positive Rates

Methodological research rarely generates a broad interest, yet our work on the validity of cluster inference methods for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) created intense discussion on both the minutia of our approach and its implications for the discipline. In the present work, we take on various critiques of our work and further explore the limitations of our original work. We address issues about the particular event-related designs we used, considering multiple event types and randomisation of events between subjects. We consider the lack of validity found with onesample permutation (sign ipping) tests, investigating a number of approaches to improve the false positive control of this widely used procedure. We found that the combination of a two-sided test and cleaning the data using ICA FIX resulted in nominal false positive rates for all datasets, meaning that data cleaning is not only important for resting state fMRI, but also for task fMRI. Finally, we discuss the implications of our work on the fMRI literature as a whole, estimating that at least 10% of the fMRI studies have used the most problematic cluster inference method (P = 0.01 cluster defining threshold), and how individual studies can be interpreted in light of our findings. These additional results underscore our original conclusions, on the importance of data sharing and thorough evaluation of statistical methods on realistic null data.

neuroscience↗