bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Klingelhoefer-Jens, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Klingelhoefer-Jens, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Recent Adversity Shapes Autonomic and Neural Threat Learning and Retrieval Under Imminent Threat: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

Recent adversity (RA) increases the risk of later mental health problems, but the mechanisms underlying this association remain largely unclear. Altered associative learning and specifically threat learning processes may constitute a potential pathway. Cross-sectional studies link RA to reduced threat-safety discrimination, a process crucial for adaptive functioning; however, longitudinal evidence allowing for more causal conclusions is lacking. In this prospective longitudinal study, 69 healthy participants completed fear acquisition, 24h-delayed extinction training and a reinstatement-test at two measurement time points six months apart (T0 and T1). We captured exposure to RA between T0 and T1 as well as autonomic and neural responses (SCRs and BOLD-fMRI), fear ratings, and salivary and hair cortisol at both assessments. During acquisition training, at the beginning of extinction (i.e., fear recall) and reinstatement-test at T1, RA-exposed individuals showed less autonomic threat-safety discrimination than unexposed individuals, mainly driven by blunted threat signal responding. These group differences predicted depression levels at the 1 and 1.5 year follow-ups and were mirrored by distinct activation in key fear-related brain regions, including striatal regions, thalamus, vmPFC, insula, and amygdala, whereas self-reported fear was unrelated to RA. In conclusion, across multiple outcomes, RA shapes threat learning and retrieval under conditions of (potential) imminent threat, with reduced autonomic threat discrimination prospectively predicting elevated depressive symptoms at 1- and 1.5-year follow-up. Overall, these findings implicate altered threat learning and retrieval processes as a potential mechanistic pathway through which RA becomes biologically embedded, potentially elevating psychopathological risk.

physiology↗

Reduced discrimination between signals of danger and safety but not overgeneralization is linked to exposure to childhood adversity in healthy adults

Childhood adversity is a strong predictor of developing psychopathological conditions. Multiple theories on the mechanisms underlying this association have been suggested which, however, differ in the operationalization of exposure. Altered (threat) learning mechanisms represent central mechanisms by which environmental inputs shape emotional and cognitive processes and ultimately behavior. 1402 healthy participants underwent a fear conditioning paradigm (acquisition training, generalization), while acquiring skin conductance responses (SCRs) and ratings (arousal, valence, and contingency). Childhood adversity was operationalized as (1) dichotomization, and following (2) the specificity model, (3) the cumulative risk model, and (4) the dimensional model. Individuals exposed to childhood adversity showed blunted physiological reactivity in SCRs, but not ratings, and reduced CS+/CS-discrimination during both phases, mainly driven by attenuated CS + responding. The latter was evident across different operationalizations of exposure following the different theories. None of the theories tested showed clear explanatory superiority. Notably, a remarkably different pattern of increased responding to the CS-is reported in the literature for anxiety patients, suggesting that individuals exposed to childhood adversity may represent a specific sub-sample. We highlight that theories linking childhood adversity to (vulnerability to) psychopathology need refinement.

neuroscience↗

Robust group- but limited individual-level (longitudinal) reliability and insights into cross-phases response prediction of conditioned fear

Here we follow the call to target measurement reliability as a key prerequisite for individual-level predictions in translational neuroscience by investigating i) longitudinal reliability at the individual and ii) group level, iii) cross-sectional reliability and iv) response predictability across experimental phases. 120 individuals performed a fear conditioning paradigm twice six month apart. Analyses of skin conductance responses, fear ratings and BOLD-fMRI with different data transformations and included numbers of trials were conducted. While longitudinal reliability was generally poor to moderate at the individual level, it was good for acquisition but not extinction at the group-level. Cross-sectional reliability was satisfactory. Higher responding in preceding phases predicted higher responding in subsequent experimental phases at a weak to moderate level depending on data specifications. In sum, the results suggest the feasibility of individual-level predictions for (very) short time intervals (e.g., cross-phases) while predictions for longer time intervals may be problematic.

neuroscience↗