Biology subjects

Kliemann, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Kliemann, D..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Fast segmentation with the NextBrain histological atlas

Structural brain analysis at the subregion level offers critical insights into healthy aging and neurodegenerative diseases. The NextBrain histological atlas was recently introduced to support such fine-grained investigations, but its existing Bayesian segmentation framework remains computationally prohibitive, particularly for large-scale studies. We present a new, open-source tool that dramatically accelerates segmentation using a hybrid approach combining: machine learning, contrast-adaptive segmentation; target-specific image synthesis; and fast diffeomorphic registration (all three with GPU support). Our method enables highly granular segmentation of brain MRI scans of any resolution and contrast (in vivo or ex vivo) at a fraction of the computational cost of the original method (<5 minutes on a GPU). We validate our tool on four different modalities (in vivo MRI, ex vivo MRI, HiP-CT, and photography) across a total of approximately 4,000 brain scans. Our results demonstrate that the accelerated approach achieves comparable accuracy to the original method in terms of Dice scores, while reducing runtime by over an order of magnitude. This work enables high-resolution anatomical analysis at unprecedented scale and flexibility, providing a practical solution for large neuroimaging studies. Our tool is publicly available in FreeSurfer (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HistoAtlasSegmentation).

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

A next-generation, histological atlas of the human brain and its application to automated brain MRI segmentation

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard tool to image the human brain in vivo. In this domain, digital brain atlases are essential for subject-specific segmentation of anatomical regions of interest (ROIs) and spatial comparison of neuroanatomy from different subjects in a common coordinate frame. High-resolution, digital atlases derived from histology (e.g., Allen atlas [7], BigBrain [13], Julich [15]), are currently the state of the art and provide exquisite 3D cytoarchitectural maps, but lack probabilistic labels throughout the whole brain. Here we present NextBrain, a next - generation probabilistic atlas of human brain anatomy built from serial 3D histology and corresponding highly granular delineations of five whole brain hemispheres. We developed AI techniques to align and reconstruct [~]10,000 histological sections into coherent 3D volumes with joint geometric constraints (no overlap or gaps between sections), as well as to semi-automatically trace the boundaries of 333 distinct anatomical ROIs on all these sections. Comprehensive delineation on multiple cases enabled us to build the first probabilistic histological atlas of the whole human brain. Further, we created a companion Bayesian tool for automated segmentation of the 333 ROIs in any in vivo or ex vivo brain MRI scan using the NextBrain atlas. We showcase two applications of the atlas: automated segmentation of ultra-high-resolution ex vivo MRI and volumetric analysis of Alzheimers disease and healthy brain ageing based on [~]4,000 publicly available in vivo MRI scans. We publicly release: the raw and aligned data (including an online visualisation tool); the probabilistic atlas; the segmentation tool; and ground truth delineations for a 100 m isotropic ex vivo hemisphere (that we use for quantitative evaluation of our segmentation method in this paper). By enabling researchers worldwide to analyse brain MRI scans at a superior level of granularity without manual effort or highly specific neuroanatomical knowledge, NextBrain holds promise to increase the specificity of MRI findings and ultimately accelerate our quest to understand the human brain in health and disease.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Video-evoked fMRI BOLD responses are highly consistent across different data acquisition sites

Naturalistic imaging paradigms, in which participants view complex videos in the scanner, are increasingly used in human cognitive neuroscience. Videos evoke temporally synchronized brain responses that are similar across subjects as well as within subjects, but the reproducibility of these brain responses across different data acquisition sites has not yet been quantified. Here we characterize the consistency of brain responses across independent samples of participants viewing the same videos in fMRI scanners at different sites (Indiana University and Caltech). We compared brain responses collected at these different sites for two carefully matched datasets with identical scanner models, acquisition, and preprocessing details, along with a third unmatched dataset in which these details varied. Our overall conclusion is that for matched and unmatched datasets alike, video-evoked brain responses have high consistency across these different sites, both when compared across groups and across pairs of individuals. As one might expect, differences between sites were larger for unmatched datasets than matched datasets. Residual differences between datasets could in part reflect participant-level variability rather than scanner- or data-related effects. Altogether our results indicate promise for the development and, critically, generalization of video fMRI studies of individual differences in healthy and clinical populations alike.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Atypical gaze patterns in autism are heterogeneous across subjects but reliable within individuals

People with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have atypical gaze onto both static visual images 1,2 and dynamic videos 3,4 that could be leveraged for diagnostic purposes 5,6. Eye tracking is important for characterizing ASD across the lifespan 7 and nowadays feasible at home (e.g., from smartphones 8). Yet gaze-based classification has been difficult to achieve, due to sources of variance both across and within subjects. Here we test three competing hypotheses: (a) that ASD could be successfully classified from the fact that gaze patterns are less reliable or noisier than in controls, (b) that gaze patterns are atypical and heterogeneous across ASD subjects but reliable over time within a subject, or (c) that gaze patterns are individually reliable and also homogenous among individuals with ASD. Leveraging dense eye tracking data from two different full-length television sitcom episodes in a total of over 150 subjects (N = 53 ASD, 107 controls) collected at two different sites, we demonstrate support for the second of these hypotheses. The findings pave the way for the investigation of autism subtypes, and for elucidating the specific visual features that best discriminate gaze patterns -- directions that will also inform neuroimaging and genetic studies of this complex disorder.

neuroscience↗