bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Klein, C. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Klein, C. C..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Children's syntax is supported by the maturation of BA44 at 4 years, but of the posterior STS at 3 years of age

Within the first years of life, children learn major aspects of their native language. However, the ability to process complex sentence structures, a core faculty in human language called syntax, has been found to emerge only slowly. A milestone in the acquisition of syntax is reached around the age of 4, when children learn a variety of syntactic concepts, including, for example, subordinate clauses. Here, we ask which maturational changes in the childs brain underlie the emergence of syntactic abilities around this critical age. We relate markers of cortical brain maturation to 3- and 4-year-olds syntactic in contrast to other language abilities. Our results show that distinct cortical brain areas support syntax in the two age groups: While 3-year-old childrens syntactic abilities were associated with increased surface area in the most posterior part of the left superior temporal sulcus, 4-year-old children showed an association with cortical thickness in the left posterior part of Brocas area, i.e. BA44. The present findings suggest that syntactic abilities rely on the maturation of distinct cortical regions in 3- compared to 4-year-olds. The observed shift to more mature regions involved in syntax may underlie the behavioral milestones in syntax acquisition around 4 years of age.

neuroscience↗

A transcriptional program shared across lineages underlies cell differentiation during metazoan development

BackgroundDuring development, most cells undergo striking changes in order to develop into functional tissues. All along this process, the identity of each tissue arises from the particular combination of regulatory transcription factors that specifically control the expression of relevant genes for growth, pattern formation and differentiation. In this scenario, regulation of gene expression turns out to be essential to determine cell fate and tissue specificity. ResultsTo characterize the dynamic transcriptional profiles during cellular differentiation, we tracked down the transcriptome of committed cells in different Drosophila melanogaster tissues and compartments at a number of developmental stages. We found that during fly development, temporal transcriptional changes shared across lineages are much larger than spatial lineage-specific transcriptional changes, and that cellular differentiation is dominated by a transcriptional program, common to multiple lineages, that governs the transition from undifferentiated to fully differentiated cells independently from the differentiation end point. The program is under weak epigenetic regulation, and it is characterized by downregulation of genes associated with cell cycle, and concomitant activation of genes involved in oxidative metabolism. Largely orthogonal to this program, tissue specific transcriptional programs, defined by a comparatively small number of genes are responsible for lineage specification. Transcriptome comparisons with worm, mouse and human, reveal that this transcriptional differentiation program is broadly conserved within metazoans. ConclusionsOur data provides a novel perspective to metazoan development, and strongly suggest a model, in which the main transcriptional drive during cell type and tissue differentiation is the transition from precursor undifferentiated to terminally differentiated cells, irrespective of cell type.

genomics↗

Dynamics of gene expression and chromatin marking during cell state transition

We have monitored the transcriptomic and epigenomic status of cells at twelve time-points during the transdifferentiation of human pre-B cells into macrophages. Using this data, we have investigated some fundamental questions regarding the role of chromatin in gene expression. We have found that, over time, genes are characterized by a limited number of chromatin states (combinations of histone modifications), and that, consistently, chromatin changes over genes tend to occur in a coordinated manner. We have observed strong association between these changes and gene expression only at the time of initial gene activation. Activation is preceded by H3K4me1 and H3K4me2, and followed in a precise order by most other histone modifications. Further changes in gene expression, comparable or even stronger than those at initial activation, occur without associated changes in histone modifications. The data generated here constitutes, thus, a unique resource to investigate transcriptomic and epigenomic dynamics during a differentiation process.

genomics↗

bsAS, an antisense long non-coding RNA, controls cell fate through regulation of blistered/DSRF isoform expression

SummaryNatural Antisense Transcripts (NATs) are long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) that overlap coding genes in the opposite strand. NATs roles have been related to gene regulation through different mechanisms, including post-transcriptional RNA processing. With the aim to identify NATs with potential regulatory function during fly development, we generated RNA-Seq data in eye-antenna, leg, and wing at third instar larvae. Among the candidate NATs, we found bsAS, antisense to bs/DSRF, a gene involved in wing development and neural processes. Through the analysis of the RNA-Seq data, we found that these two different functions are carried out by the two different protein isoforms encoded in the bs gene. We also found that the usage of these isoforms is regulated by bsAS. This regulation is essential for the correct determination of cell fate during Drosophila development, as bsAS knockouts show highly aberrant phenotypes. bs regulation by bsAS is mediated by the specific physical interaction of the bsAS promoter with the promoters of bs, and it likely involves a mechanism, where expression of bsAS leads to the collision of RNA polymerases acting in opposite directions, preventing the elongation of the longer isoforms of bs, the ones carrying the neural related functions. Evolutionary analysis suggests that the bsAS NAT emerged simultaneously to the long-short isoform structure of bs, preceding the emergence of wings in insects, and maybe related to regulation of neural differentiation.

molecular biology↗