bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Klaver, L. M. F.

Publications and source records attributed to Klaver, L. M. F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Granular retrosplenial cortex layer 2/3 generates high-frequency oscillations coupled with hippocampal theta and gamma in online states or sharp-wave ripples in offline states

Neuronal oscillations support information transfer by temporally aligning the activity of anatomically distributed writer and reader cell assemblies. High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) such as hippocampal CA1 sharp-wave ripples (SWRs; 100-250 Hz) are sufficiently fast to initiate synaptic plasticity between assemblies and are required for memory consolidation. HFOs are observed in parietal and midline cortices including granular retrosplenial cortex (gRSC). In offline brain states (e.g. quiet wakefulness) gRSC HFOs co-occur with CA1 SWRs, while in online states (e.g. ambulation) HFOs persist with the emergence of theta oscillations. The mechanisms of gRSC HFO oscillations, specifically whether the gRSC can intrinsically generate HFOs, and which layers support HFOs across states, remain unclear. We addressed these issues in behaving mice using optogenetic excitation in individual layers of the gRSC and high density silicon-probe recordings across gRSC layers and hippocampus CA1. Optogenetically induced HFOs (iHFOs) could be elicited by depolarizing excitatory neurons with 100 ms half-sine wave pulses in layer 2/3 (L2/3) or layer 5 (L5) though L5 iHFOs were of lower power than in L2/3. Critically, spontaneous HFOs were only observed in L2/3 and never in L5. Intra-laminar monosynaptic connectivity between excitatory and inhibitory neurons was similar across layers, suggesting other factors restrict HFOs to L2/3. To compare HFOs in online versus offline states we analyzed, separately, HFOs that did or did not co-occur with CA1 SWRs. Using current-source density analysis we found uniform synaptic inputs to L2/3 during all gRSC HFOs, suggesting layer-specific inputs may dictate the localization of HFOs to L2/3. HFOs occurring without SWRs were aligned with the descending phase of both gRSC and CA1 theta oscillations and were coherent with CA1 high frequency gamma oscillations (50-80 Hz). These results demonstrate that gRSC can internally generate HFOs without rhythmic inputs and that HFOs occur exclusively in L2/3, coupled to distinct hippocampal oscillations in online versus offline states.

neuroscience↗

Spontaneous Variations in Arousal Modulate Subsequent Visual Processing and Local Field Potential Dynamics in the Ferret during Quiet Wakefulness

Behavioral states affect neuronal responses throughout the cortex and influence visual processing. Quiet wakefulness (QW) is a behavioral state during which subjects are quiescent, but awake and connected to the environment. Here, we examined the effects of pre-stimulus arousal variability on post-stimulus neural activity in primary visual cortex (V1) and posterior parietal cortex (PPc) in awake ferrets, using the pupil diameter as an indicator of arousal. We observed that during low arousal, low- frequency power increases during visual stimulation, and that the peak alpha frequency shifted depending on the arousal state. High arousal increased gamma power as well as low-frequency inter- and intra-areal coherence. Using a simplified model of laminar circuits, we show that this connectivity pattern is compatible with feedback signals targeting infragranular layers in area PPc and supragranular layers in V1. Neurons in V1 displayed higher firing rates at their preferred orientations on high-arousal trials. Broad-spiking cells in V1 entrained to high-frequency oscillations (>80 Hz), whereas narrow-spiking neurons phase-locked to low (12-18 Hz) and high-frequency (>80 Hz) rhythms. These results indicate that the variability and sensitivity of post-stimulus cortical responses and coherence depend on the pre-stimulus behavioral state and account for the neuronal response variability observed during repeated stimulation.

neuroscience↗