bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kivlin, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Kivlin, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Niche constraints drive differences between mycorrhizal fungal guilds in future range shifts

Mycorrhizal fungi are a diverse and ubiquitous group of plant symbionts whose distribution strongly influences ecosystem function across the globe. Yet, until now, we do not have quantitative data on the range sizes of different mycorrhizal fungal taxa, limiting our capacity to forecast future shifts in community composition and function. Here, we use 115,924 DNA sequence-derived observations to map the distribution of 651 common mycorrhizal fungal taxa and forecast future changes to their range sizes. We demonstrate that climate, plant cover, and soil factors, particularly mean annual temperature, net primary productivity, and soil organic carbon, exert major control over mycorrhizal fungal distributions. Based on these drivers, the ecological niches of mycorrhizal fungi consistently differ between arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal functional guilds. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal taxa generally occupy a wider niche breadth than ectomycorrhizal fungi, occurring across larger ranges of climate, soil, plant cover, topography, and disturbance conditions. Our models also predict widespread decreases in the suitable range size of mycorrhizal fungal taxa under projected future global climates, with average ranges decreasing by 13.8% or ~2.2 million km2 under high emissions scenarios (ssp5-8.5). This decrease in projected range size will be most pronounced for ectomycorrhizal fungi, strongly linked to constraints from their smaller overall niches. By generating a global atlas of common mycorrhizal fungi and their associated environmental niche, we establish a critical baseline for widely suspected declines in global fungal biodiversity.

ecology↗

Earlier snowmelt reduces the strength of carbon sink in montane meadows

O_LIWarming temperatures are changing winters, leading to earlier snowmelt. This shift can lead to an earlier and potentially longer growing season, which in turn may affect various plant-mediated ecosystem functions. Despite its relevance in the carbon cycle, we still know little about how earlier snowmelt impacts the carbon balance in ecosystems over the growing season, e.g., does it only shift phenology, or does it affect the overall carbon uptake? Most studies rely on interannual variability in snowmelt timing, making it difficult to isolate snowmelt effects from other confounding variables, e.g, temperature and moisture anomalies. To address this uncertainty, we investigated how experimentally advancing snowmelt affects the carbon cycling of montane meadows across the growing season. C_LIO_LIWe experimentally advanced the snowmelt date in a montane meadow by approximately 12 days and collected data every two weeks throughout the growing season, including net ecosystem exchange (NEE), gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (ER), plant composition, and shrub, graminoid, and forb biomass. C_LIO_LIEarly in the growing season, GPP was higher in the early snowmelt plots, though this effect decreased as the growing season progressed. Our modeling of cumulative NEE showed that earlier snowmelt increased the carbon sink strength by 22%, with the strongest effect in the early spring and the effect diminishing as the growing season progressed, with control plots being a greater carbon sink in the later season. Graminoid biomass was 47% higher in plots with earlier snowmelt, but there was no change in total biomass. C_LIO_LISynthesis: As winters warm and snowmelt occurs earlier, plant productivity will shift earlier in the growing season, and montane meadows will become a stronger carbon sink. However, this effect will differ seasonally, altering the carbon balance in montane meadows. C_LI

ecology↗