Kingdon, K. A. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2021

Death comes for us all: an interplay of habitat selection, movement, and social behavior relate to cause specific mortality among grey wolves

Avoiding death infects biological processes, including behavior. Habitat selection, movement, and sociality are highly flexible behaviors that influence the mortality risks and subsequent fitness of individuals. In the Anthropocene, animals are experiencing increased risks from direct human causes and increased spread of infectious diseases. Using integrated step selection analysis, we tested how the habitat selection, movement, and social behaviors of grey wolves vary as an individual dies due to humans or canine distemper virus (CDV) and how those behaviors may vary in the lead up to death. Behaviors that changed prior to death were strongly related to how an animal eventually died. Wolves killed by humans moved slower than wolves that survived and selected to be nearer roads closer in time to their death. Wolves that died due to CDV moved progressively slower as they neared death and reduced their avoidance of wet habitats. All animals, regardless of dying or not maintained strong selection to be near packmates across time, which seemingly contributed to disease dynamics in the packs that became infected with CDV. Habitat selection, movement, and sociality interact to put individuals and groups at greater risks, influencing their cause-specific mortality. Lay SummaryNot much is known about behaviors prior to death in wild animals. Grey wolves killed by humans selected to be in riskier areas increasingly prior to their deaths. Wolves that died due to disease moved slower and changed their habitat selection to be in areas with more water as they became sicker. Sick wolves also continued to select for packmates, increasing the chances that the whole pack would succumb to the disease.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2021

Moving together, foraging apart: effects of the social environment on movement-integrated habitat selection

O_LIMovement links the distribution of habitats with the social environment of animals using those habitats; yet integrating movement, habitat selection, and socioecology remains an opportunity for further study. C_LIO_LIHere, our objective was to disentangle the roles of habitat selection and social association as drivers of collective movement in a gregarious ungulate. To accomplish this objective, we (1) assessed whether socially familiar individuals form discrete social communities and whether social communities have high spatial, but not necessarily temporal, overlap; and (2) we modelled the relationship between collective movement and selection of foraging habitats using socially informed integrated step selection analysis. C_LIO_LIWe used social network analysis to assign individuals to social communities and determine short and long-term social preference among individuals. Using integrated step selection functions (iSSF), we then modelled the effect of social processes, i.e., nearest neighbour distance and social preference, and movement behaviour on patterns of habitat selection. C_LIO_LIBased on assignment of individuals to social communities and home range overlap analyses, individuals assorted into discrete social communities, and these communities had high spatial overlap. By unifying social network analysis with iSSF, we identified movement-dependent social association, where individuals foraged with more familiar individuals, but moved collectively with any between foraging patches. C_LIO_LIOur study demonstrates that social behaviour and space use are inter-related based on spatial overlap of social communities and movement-dependent habitat selection. Movement, habitat selection, and social behaviour are linked in theory. Here, we put these concepts into practice to demonstrate that movement is the glue connecting individual habitat selection to the social environment. C_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗