bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kim-Spoon, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Kim-Spoon, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Parent-Child Cortical Similarity Indexes Multiple Dimensions of Sensitivity in the Association Between Family Environment and Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms

Family environment is a robust predictor of adolescent internalizing symptoms, yet its strength varies across adolescents. We tested whether this variation is partly captured by how similar an adolescent's cortical structure is to their parent's and whether different forms of this similarity matter in different cortical systems. In 115 parent-child dyads from two cohorts, structural MRI quantified similarity across 400 cortical parcels in two forms: phenotypic similarity in regional morphometry and architectural similarity in interregional morphometric organization. Parent-child similarity was not directly associated with symptoms, whereas its interactions with family environment were jointly significant (chi-square(4) = 14.92, P = 0.005). Phenotypic similarity in the sensory-limbic system and architectural similarity in the association system each moderated the association between family environment and symptoms (both beta = 0.22). In both cases, the association was strongest among less similar dyads. The phenotypic interaction was distributed across sensory-limbic networks and was not reproduced by similarity to unrelated adults or by the child's cortical atypicality. The architectural interaction was concentrated in the dorsal attention and default mode networks and was distinguishable from unrelated-adult similarity but not from child atypicality. Together, these findings raise the possibility that markers of environmental sensitivity need not reside in the child alone. Parent-child cortical similarity may index a dyadic component of this sensitivity, one not adequately represented by a single similarity score but distributed across forms of similarity and cortical systems.

neuroscience↗

A convergent behavioral-neural profile of parental dysregulation and the link between parent-child brain-state similarity and child negative affect

Parent-child neural similarity is often interpreted as a marker of attunement, but its developmental significance may not be uniformly positive across family environments. We tested whether the parent's own emotional and regulatory profile, measured both behaviorally and neurally, moderates the developmental significance of parent-child neural similarity. Applying a hidden Markov model (HMM-MAR; K = 6 states) to whole-brain fMRI timeseries from 32 parent-youth dyads who separately watched the same emotional film, we derived per-dyad measures of brain-state similarity. Parent-child dyads showed greater brain-state similarity than parent-shuffle null pairs (d = -0.55, p = .004), indicating dyad-specific alignment beyond responses shared across viewers of the same film. Parent self-reported internalizing showed only a weak direct relation to child negative affect (r = .31, p = .085). However, the association between neural similarity and child negative affect depended on parent internalizing (b = 5.62, p = .018; R^2): stronger parent-child similarity predicted higher child negative affect when parents reported higher, but not lower, internalizing. A parallel interaction emerged when parent internalizing was replaced by a neural index of the parent's own state dynamics (parent neural-state unpredictability, Htrans; b = 5.95, p = .004), indicating that the effect reflects the parent's broader regulatory profile rather than a single measurement modality. Both interactions were clearest in the primary model and only partially robust across model orders and parcellations. These findings suggest that dyadic neural similarity should be interpreted in context: resembling a parent with a dysregulated profile may confer risk rather than protection.

neuroscience↗