Kent, J. K. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2024

Presynaptic Rac1 in the hippocampus selectively regulates working memory

One of the most extensively studied members of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases, Rac1 is an intracellular signal transducer that remodels actin and phosphorylation signaling networks. Previous studies have shown that Rac1-mediated signaling is associated with hippocampal-dependent working memory and longer-term forms of learning and memory and that Rac1 can modulate forms of both pre- and postsynaptic plasticity. How these different cognitive functions and forms of plasticity mediated by Rac1 are linked, however, is unclear. Here, we show that spatial working memory is selectively impaired following the expression of a genetically encoded Rac1-inhibitor at presynaptic terminals, while longer-term cognitive processes are affected by Rac1 inhibition at postsynaptic sites. To investigate the regulatory mechanisms of this presynaptic process, we leveraged new advances in mass spectrometry to identify the proteomic and post-translational landscape of presynaptic Rac1 signaling. We identified serine/threonine kinases and phosphorylated cytoskeletal signaling and synaptic vesicle proteins enriched with active Rac1. The phosphorylated sites in these proteins are at positions likely to have regulatory effects on synaptic vesicles. Consistent with this, we also report changes in the distribution and morphology of synaptic vesicles and in postsynaptic ultrastructure following presynaptic Rac1 inhibition. Overall, this study reveals a previously unrecognized presynaptic role of Rac1 signaling in cognitive processes and provides insights into its potential regulatory mechanisms.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2017

A global Brassica pest and a sympatric cryptic ally, Plutella australiana (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), show strong divergence despite the capacity to hybridize

The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, has been intensively studied due to its ability to evolve insecticide resistance and status as the worlds most destructive pest of brassicaceous crops. The surprise discovery of a cryptic ally, Plutella australiana Landry & Hebert, with apparent endemism to Australia, immediately raised questions regarding the extent of ecological and genetic diversity between these two species, whether gene flow could occur, and ultimately if specific management was required. Here, we show that despite sympatric distributions and the capacity to hybridize in controlled laboratory experiments, striking differences in genetic and phenotypic traits exist that are consistent with contrasting colonization histories and reproductive isolation after secondary contact. Almost 1500 Plutella individuals were collected from wild and cultivated brassicaceous plants at 75 locations throughout Australia. Plutella australiana was commonly found on all Brassica host types sampled except commercial vegetables, which are routinely sprayed with insecticide. Bioassays using four commonly-used insecticides found that P. australiana was 19-306 fold more susceptible than P. xylostella. Genome-wide SNPs derived from RADseq revealed substantially higher levels of genetic diversity across P. australiana compared with P. xylostella nuclear genomes, yet both species showed limited variation in mtDNA. Infection with a single Wolbachia subgroup B strain was fixed in P. australiana, suggesting that a selective sweep contributed to low mtDNA diversity, while a subgroup A strain infected just 1.5 % of P. xylostella. Although P. australiana is a potential pest of brassica crops, it is of secondary importance to P. xylostella.

genetics↗